Talk:Şehzade Mustafa

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Turkey Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm not an expert on this, but at current it seems a little bit biased? Furius 10:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is some good information here. Since it is an article in the English version of Wikipedia, though, it definitely needs copy editing for usage and syntax if nothing else. It's obvious that it was written by a non-native speaker who hasn't quite mastered written English.

I tried but I can't find a photo. I think it is because he couldn't be the emperor. He was forgotten in a sense but I'm expanding the article thesedays. We will see what can we do. Deliogul 19:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What does Mukhlisi mean?--Jandkay (talk) 02:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An username (poetry) Trapaemin (talk) 13:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Although there are 7 sources, The section After the execution needs to be sourced. It reads; Mustafa's army found the execution unfair because they were thinking that the reason of the execution was the political maneuvers of Hurrem Sultan and Rüstem Pasha, neither of whom were Anatolian or Turkish. The first part of the sentence is correct but in Ottoman Empire ethnical origin had never been a matter of debate. Besides even Mustafa' s mother Gülbahar was also a non Anatolian. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:51, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Şehzade Mehmed: Amasya 1546- Bursa 10.9.1553.. 7 yaşında boğduruldu.

Şehzade Ahmed: Ölümü, Konya 1552..

Şah sultan (1550- 2.10.1577): Zevci Damad Abdülkerim ağa, yeniçeri ağası..İzdivacı 1.8.1562 (İsmihan ve Gevherhan sultanlarla aynı düğünde).

Nergisşah sultan (Doğumu 1536): Zevci Damad Cenabi Ahmet Paşa, şair, tarihçi, Enderuni ve çeşnigirbaşı, 20 yıl kadar Anadolu beylerbeyi).

I suggest we remove this section as it appears to be pure original research and no one has been able to provide a reliable source for it since a year ago. Keivan.f^Talk 19:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. Currently there are no concubines indicated, which is correct (even if they continue to be indicated on wikipedia slave, even with personal pages full of invented information, and you cannot get them removed). However, the children indicated are real, because I remember having found them in historiographical works, and it is very likely that there were indeed others. As soon as I recover the source I will insert it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.149.133.188 (talk) 09:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's the issue with the spouses???Are they real??I just wanted to know!! Khondoker Jobair (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1. No concubine of Mustafa is known. However, some Slavic wikipedias report lists of them and even has pages about them (such as Rumeysa), but the information is invented or transposed from fiction, obviously without source and moreover in contrast with historiography (for example, to many of they are given the title of Haseki Sultan, which is impossible). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.149.133.188 (talk) 09:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]