Talk:.au

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Page move

(from

WP:RM
)

.au (domain name) → .au

The domain name is primary usage, and aligns page naming with the 200+ other

ccTLDs. .au is currently a redirect to this page. File format usage is very much secondary, and is disambiguated. -- kjd
14:13, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

.oz

what about .oz in future? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.81.170 (talk) 03:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear that .oz continues to exist as an OpenNIC TLD. See also http://wiki.opennicproject.org/OpenNICNamespaces . They document it as:

dot OZ is the TLD (Top Level Domain) custom made for Australians, but still available to everyone. dot OZ is targeted to those who may want a domain with the cultural association with Australia, but without the requirements of .com.au, net.au or org.au registrations.

What would be an appropriate way to include this information in Wikipedia? It's not part of the .au TLD, but it is a current TLD for Australians designed to take the place of the one that was migrated to .oz.au. Shamino (talk) 02:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 13:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 13:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 13:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Assessment comment The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:.au/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

B class -- appears to cover the topic. needs to improve sourcing and a lead Gnangarra 00:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 00:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Remove 3 names of businesses that were the first to get certification

There is no need for those 3 business to be named in the article. It add nothing to the quality of the content and the link seems to be doe to get higher SEO. (who cares if they were the first to be certified, as all business must now be certified). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.47.158.38 (talk) 06:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]