Talk:.id

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Indonesia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Might this be a "vanity" TLD? (id being i.d.) Also, along with .co.ck, .ac.id seems to be the only "word" inside domain names... are there any others? Tar7arus 15:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A few others, .org.gy, .co.il, .co.at and the like, are in the list of domain hacks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.102.80.239 (talk) 16:37, August 23, 2007 (UTC)

It would be a better vanity TLD if they were willing to allow second-level domain names, ie: http://fake.id - but it looks like they do not. --66.102.80.239 10:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it appropriate when a link that says .id domain registration and hosting points to a commercial company, in article about .id?

Or should there be a separate page that lists companies who provides .id registration service?

Rasajeruk (talk) 23:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.pandi.or.id/ketentuan-umum/
  • In .id on 2011-05-20 21:43:11, 404 Not Found
  • In .id on 2011-05-31 14:57:35, 404 Not Found

--

I have just modified one external link on .id. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130716020745/http://www.pandi.or.id/en/blog/id-tld-domain-name-forum to http://www.pandi.or.id/en/blog/id-tld-domain-name-forum

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]