Talk:15 equal temperament

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Improvement?

How is emphasizing septimal minor third in the interval size table an improvement? Hyacinth (talk) 23:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know? It is the interval that is most poorly matched by this system? I don't see a really good reason to emphasize it. Change it back? I wouldn't object; I have no opinion, really. Cazort (talk) 22:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 15 equal temperament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blackwood's notation

There is a discrepancy between the text and the score. The score showing Blackwood's notation of 15edo suggests that the letters are notated in 5edo (with #/b equal to a whole step, and diatonic semitones equaling unison), and then arrows are used to indicate step change. In contrast, the text is some combination of 12edo or something. I think the score is correct, but I'm not sure, and I don't know how to add the microtonal accidentals to the text anyways. Awelotta (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]