Talk:1Point3Acres

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconWebsites: Computing Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the Chinese-language forum 1Point3Acres created a COVID-19 tracker that the CDC used? Source: Chen, Pingying 陈娉莹; Shen, Kai 沈开 (2020-06-09). "华人团队构建全球疫情实时追踪系统 已被CDC、JHU使用" [The Chinese team built a real-time global epidemic tracking system, which has been used by CDC and JHU]. Chinese edition of Scientific American (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2023-02-24. Retrieved 2023-02-24.

    The article notes: "在新冠肺炎肆虐全球之际,一群在美留学生、华人为主的志愿者团队在北美华人网站“一亩三分地”的组织下,于 2020 年 1 月底开始汇总搜集北美实时疫情信息,整合全球数据,搭建了目前全世界最实时、广泛、地理区分度最细的新冠疫情追踪平台——“一亩三分地”新型冠状病毒世界疫情动态追踪平台 CovidNet(网址:https://coronavirus.1point3acres.com/ ),受到国际用户一致好评。如今,CovidNet 已成为约翰霍普金斯大学(JHU)疫情追踪平台和维基百科新冠全球大流行页面的北美数据主要引用来源,并成为美国疾控中心(CDC)使用参考数据来源之一。目前该数据库已有超过 2.25 亿访问量,并且被 522 个组织或机构使用。相关预印本已在 arXiv 发布。一亩三分地(1point3acres)”是汇集留学、就业、移民信息的北美华人论坛。..."

    From Google Translate: "When COVID-19 is raging around the world, a group of Chinese-dominated volunteer teams studying in the United States, under the organization of the North American Chinese website 1Point3Acres, began to collect real-time pandemic information in North America at the end of January 2020, and integrated the global The data has built the world's most real-time, extensive, and geographically differentiated new crown epidemic tracking platform - "one acre and three points of land" new coronavirus world epidemic dynamic tracking platform CovidNet (website: https://coronavirus.1point3acres .com/ ), well received by international users. Today, CovidNet is the primary cited source for North American data on the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) outbreak tracking platform and Wikipedia's new crown global pandemic page, and one of the reference data sources used by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The database currently has more than 225 million visits and is used by 522 organizations or institutions. Related preprints have been posted on arXiv. ..."1point3acres" is a North American Chinese forum that gathers information on studying abroad, employment, and immigration."

Created by Cunard (talk). Self-nominated at 09:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/1Point3Acres; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Interesting article. Nominated on the same day it was created, more than long enough at 4607 characters. Appears well sourced with good cross-section of sources, though I would flag to Cunard that the very first source cited appears to link to the wrong article. AGF on non-English sources. FWIW, Earwig says "Violation Unlikely"; there is just one rather high match at 35.1% which is the NIH website, but that is due to a direct quote that is cited appropriately. Neutrally worded; includes both positive and critical reception of CovidNet. QPQ is done. This leaves the hook, which has been reworded as ALT1. I would propose a slight tweak to that below:
ALT1a is essentially the same as ALT1, so I will go ahead and approve this. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Very nice job on the article.

Onel5969 TT me 13:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]