Talk:2012 (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article2012 (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 18, 2011Good article nomineeListed
October 4, 2012Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2012 (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2012 (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most scientifically flawed and absurd science fiction film ever made

I think there should be at least some mention of how bad the science is in this movie. NASA experts voted it the most scientifically flawed and absurd science fiction film ever made in a conference held at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, in 2011 [1]. Robert Walker (talk) 08:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page isn't protected, so why not
go ahead and add it? DonIago (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

2012 film and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22#2012 film until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

2012 film and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 20#2012 film until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]