Talk:2021 Indian Air Force Mil Mi-17 crash

A news item involving 2021 Indian Air Force Mil Mi-17 crash was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 December 2021.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

India: Tamil Nadu / History / Transport High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup. This article is supported by the Transport in India workgroup (assessed as High-importance). Aviation: Accidents This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. This article is supported by the Aviation accident project. project's importance scale .

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia / Post-Cold War B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles B This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Indian military history task force South Asian military history task force Post-Cold War task force

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• 2021 IAF Mi 17V5 crash.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

mainpage. Venkat TL (talk) 04:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@Venkat TL Unable to do so as edits are restricted due to edit filter Rahilmohd0220 (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it after your agreement above. Venkat TL (talk) 06:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this tag has now become redundant. As the event is over and there are no longer any speculations. I have removed it. --Venkat TL (talk) 03:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, "Reactions" sections, and especially their list format and flags, are despised by many editors as unencyclopedic quotefarms sourced to primary sources such as Twitter. This "Reactions" sections should be trimmed. Abductive (reasoning) 03:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove As elaborated above by @Abductive. Every major Office holder and politician have mourned the death. This section has no encyclopedic value. I had already removed it yesterday and I have removed it again. This section should not be added without making consensus about its significance. Venkat TL (talk) 03:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove: I am the one who placed that section there. While I do get it has some purpose I realize that it could fit better into a separate article, Reactions to the 2021 Indian Air Force Mil Mi-17 crash. Dunutubble (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove. I disagree with the reasoning that all "reactions" sections are useless, oftentimes it's necessary to include major countries official positions on major international events. In this case though, the section as such is just blasé thoughts and prayers. That being said there may be substantive reactions in the near-future to this event once more details are known, and it may be necessary to include a reactions section of a different format once those are reflected in reliable sources. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 20:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is written in incident section that aircraft crashed at 12:10 and reports of crash emerged at 12:20. But contact was lost at 12:22! How is it possible that it was in contact after 12:10 if it crashed? -- Parnaval (talk) 09:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The one reference that mentions 12:10 says "around 12:10" so I would have thought that the contact lost time is probably more accurate indication of the time of the accident. We may just have to wait for more detailed reports to come out. MilborneOne (talk) 09:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Parnaval Wikipedia article does not say that crashed at 12:10. The word used in the Wiki article is Around 12:10, it crashed. TNIE Which is not a very good source, is used to source this and it also says crash around 12:10. As @MilborneOne, said better to wait for more reliable sources and official report. Did Def minister Rajnath Singh make a statement yet? I believe he will quote the exact time of the crash. We could then use the same. Venkat TL (talk) 10:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Parnaval, MilborneOne this official statement clears the confusion on time discrepancy. The initial reports may be unreliable. Venkat TL (talk) 10:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree we can use the official statement to correct the timeline. MilborneOne (talk) 10:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There were two crashes this year. There was another crash landing of another mi-17 on Nov 18 2021 in Arunachal Pradesh where all 5 passengers and crew survived but the incident was not widely reported. I propose renaming of the article and inclusion of a section detailing that Arunachal incident. --User:Netizenwa 11:05 AM, December 9 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose The Arunachal crash seems to be not notable enough to have its own article, or a section of its own. If there is only one article, then there is no need to rename. --Venkat TL (talk) 11:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose As already mentioned this is a notable accident because of those involved the other is not and would not have an article of its own. MilborneOne (talk) 11:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose WIth all due respect, I think that would be best deserving of a separate article instead of part of this one. Sincerely,Dunutubble (talk) 14:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - This is not a list article. Unrelated accidents which happen to take place within the same year and country should not be grouped. - ZLEA _T\^C 22:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Name of the sole survivor Varun Singh has been removed Special:Diff/1059589971. I suggest we revert it back and include this name as a special case. Venkat TL (talk) 10:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not normal practice as User:WilliamJE mention in the edit summary, why would this be a special case ? MilborneOne (talk) 12:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could some please point me to this norm. Thanks Arunram (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think it is a practice. This is because:

1. Similar articles, such as the
   Canberra air disaster
   , have their victims named.
2. Bree O'Mara's page was created after she was killed in Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771. She would never have had an article if this rule existed.
3. When it comes to survivors, Bahia Bakari's sole claim to survive a plane accident- but she still has an article, which not only won an AFD battle but was also created after the accident occurred.
4. The
   YAK-Service Flight 9633, 1983 Negev mid-air collision
   name their sole survivors.
5. Even about other accidents non-aviation related, 1997 Thredbo landslide still names their own (page-given) survivor, Stuart Diver. More loosely there would be Marcus Luttrell for Operation Red Wings.
6. See Category:Sole survivors and List of sole survivors of aviation accidents and incidents - This stuff is notable enough to have entire pages.

That's why I think there is no evidence whatsoever Varun Singh is unnotable. Dunutubble (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

Varun Singh (Indian Air Force officer). Dunutubble (talk) 19:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Varun Singh (Indian Air Force Officer). He is notable enough. Dunutubble (talk) 14:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• The location is as described already in the sources. Abductive (reasoning) 15:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Which one? I am sorry, I seem to have missed. I was looking for it in past though. Venkat TL (talk) 15:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  There's transliteration problem when one delves into it. Nanjappachatiram, Nanchappanchathram, are rendered differently but are in fact the same village that the coordinates point to. Abductive (reasoning) 16:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]