Talk:2023 Odisha train collision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconIndia: Odisha / Railways Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Odisha (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways (assessed as High-importance).
Note icon
This article was last assessed in June 2023.
WikiProject iconTrains Mid‑importance
WikiProject icon
 Trains Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 5 June 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Strong community opposition to this request. (non-admin closure) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 23:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Odisha train collision → ? – Still does not need year, and perhaps "collision" isn't consistent, as Tempi train crash uses "crash". 90.255.15.152 (talk) 18:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 20:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Premature close

  • @User:Nythar: I do not think this is an appropriate close. Editors are allowed to start RMs without any alternate title specified. Such RMs are expected to find a proper title by considering all possible cases without being pointed to any specific direction. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 18:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This IP has taken to starting move discussions without a good understanding of relevant policies (see their contrib history) (even once denying that they had started a failed move discussion, which is technically incorrect). In their move request above, they stated "2023 Odisha train collision → Odisha rail disaster – Consistency", even though
    WP:DISASTER specifically states "Try to avoid the words disaster, tragedy and crisis because this characterization is too subjective." (You can also see their other move discussions if you're interested.) It does not appear that this user is constructively starting move discussions, which, in addition to the fact that they didn't specify an alternate article title, led me to close the above discussion. If you believe this discussion has potential, you're of course more than welcome to re-open it. Nythar (💬-🍀) 19:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
I think this page title needs discussing. Closing two RMs on the same day they were opened is premature. Jim Michael 2 (talk) 19:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They withdrew their first RM. Nythar (💬-🍀) 19:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In an attempt to try to bring some common ground to the naming discussions, I have now put a "Consensus" template at the top of this talk page. Hopefully those requesting moves can first catch up on existing best practices and consensus before repeating some of the same issues. - Fuzheado | Talk 20:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I've reopened the thing as you're allowed "?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.255.15.152 (talk • contribs)

The problem with that is it's not Odisha's only notable train collision. The Jajpur derailment also took place there. Hence if Odisha rather than Balasore is in the title, we need to include the year. I'd say that there isn't a common name for this crash & that Balasore train crash would be a better title for reasons of accuracy & concision. Collision doesn't specify multiple trains being involved. A train crashing into a vehicle or a collapsed bridge could accurately be described as a collision or a crash. Jim Michael 2 (talk) 12:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If that was the case
Odisha train collision should have been at a disambiguation page or included as a hatnote, so that this was clear. However, a derailment isn't the same as a collision, so a hatnote on this article stating For the derailment in Jajpur, see Jajpur derailment would do. I maintain my support to a move. --woodensuperman 12:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Interesting. Thanks for pointing that out. It caused me to look down the rabbit hole and I found out in 2015 a line in that section advising that using the year was OK for disambiguation was taken out without explanation. I have restored that guidance and documented it here: Special:Diff/1147157764/1158830242. It also better reflects the reality of our current practices, which is a mix of undated and dated titles, depending on the situation and the need for disambiguation. - Fuzheado | Talk 14:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, keep current title. If we consider the when, where, and what:
    • What - Probably the easiest determination – we should avoid "disaster" as per
      WP:DISASTER
      so collision is fine.
    • Where - As established earlier (see Consensus note), the news outlets inside and outside India use "Odisha" in headlines in the vast majority of cases and not "Balasore."
    • When - Because Odisha is the preferred "where," we see it is a very big state of more than 40 million people. That's bigger than most
      WP:NCE#Road and rail
      , this disambiguation function is a valid reason to add the year.
It may be that in the future the accident is recognizable with a different label. Until then, this is the best one prescribed by our policies and guidelines. – Fuzheado | Talk 17:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Point of information: Originally, the
2009 Orissa train derailment and stayed for its first 2 years before being renamed. [1] One could argue that the current name is non-ideal especially since it removed "train." However, a quick perusal of these articles in Wikipedia show we are all over the place in terms of consistency with "derailment" or "train derailment." Category:Derailments by country – Fuzheado | Talk 18:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
That new title is better because it's much shorter & more precise. Derailments are usually of trains. There's a great deal of inconsistency in our titles of train incidents. Words used in titles include accident, crash, collision, derailment, disaster & tragedy. Jim Michael 2 (talk) 10:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Information error

In the 'Investigation' section, after mentioning that the Coromandel Express left Papuna station and was about to approach Bahanaga Bazar Station, the speed of the train is mentioned to be 128km/hr and the distance between the two stations is touted to be 5 km. At that rate, the train should take 141 seconds to travel that distance and not 141 minutes as currently mentioned. Requesting to correct the information provided. Lawdeer (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Lawdeer Thanks for the note. I've corrected it! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 16:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

left and continued?

Two unreserved coaches and the brake van of the Bengaluru–Howrah Express were derailed. The remainder of the train, which included the engine and 20 coaches, left with its passengers and continued to Balasore, where a further damaged coach was detached.

This causes more question than it answers. Please rewrite this to clarify: did the remainder really just keep going, as if nothing happened, or are you talking about stopping and then starting again? Did the train crew not even realize they had lost the end of their train? Who made the decision to leave?

CapnZapp (talk) 23:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

According to latest eyewitness reports, and you can corroborate this from other valid articles from reputed publications, the Yashwantpur-Howrah express driver and passangers felt a massive thud and a shake when the accident happened, however since only the last few bogies of the train were affected, they didn't realize what had happened. The train did stop further away from the accident spot, about 100 meters or so, and people got out and saw that the accident had happened. Some stranded and not very injured passengers from the Coromandel express also boarded the other train and reached Howrah where they were provided first-aid and transport was arranged to take them to their homes/destinations. Now exactly when did the Yaswantpur-Howrah express leave after stopping is not very clear, but I agree, the information currently mentioned is a bit misleading and should be reworded.
Lawdeer (talk) 04:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2023_Odisha_train_collision&oldid=1215414562"