Talk:22 equal temperament

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's defunct .Tunings, Temperaments, and ScalesWikipedia:WikiProject Tunings, Temperaments, and ScalesTemplate:WikiProject Tunings, Temperaments, and ScalesTunings, Temperaments, and Scales articles

Music theory

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tunings, Temperaments, and Scales#External links to music. —Keenan Pepper 19:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following examples need to be replaced with links to HTML files describing them, or migrated to the wikipedia Commons. - Rainwarrior 04:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tibia by Paul Erlich mp3

Glassic by Paul Erlich mp3

Decatonic Swing by Paul Erlich and Ara Sarkissian mp3

Glass Onion MIDI-file, the Beatles song retuned by Joe Monzo

Revenge of the Inorganic Compounds by Igliashon Jones metal rock mp3

Clash by Night Hangover Transition by Aaron Krister Johnson, ogg

Clash by Night Woogie by Aaron Krister Johnson ogg

Night on Porcupine Mountain by Modest Mussorgsky as mutated by Gene Ward Smith ogg

Some of the text here strikes me as just bogus. For example, "three minor whole tones (10/9 tones) give a fourth, and five give a minor sixth.". There is nothing in 22-ET that resembles a minor whole tone!!! This discussion doesn't make sense. Cazort (talk) 03:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty of "original research" here, from virtual and self-appointed "music theorists", which has no place on Wikipedia. Clean it all up, please. Frank Zamjatin (talk) 13:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are random intervals in the Interval size table shaded or darker than other intervals in the table? Hyacinth (talk) 18:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those are the intervals that are more than 1/4 of a step (in this case, more than ~13.5 cents) out of tune. The same convention is used elsewhere on Wikipedia, too; poor matches are shaded, good matches are not. For instance, look at the article on 31 equal temperament. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 22:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just edited the introductory text to

• explain the shading convention used here;
• correct the approximate error to 13.6 cents; and
• change the column label "error" to "error (cents)".

yoyo (talk) 03:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]