Talk:6WIND

Contested deletion

We realize that we have yet to add the references to the 6WIND page - there are several of us working on it and the only way we could see to allow multiple editors was to move it from the sandbox.

Other editors are adding references and links at this time.

If we made a mistake by moving the page before we added the references, we appologize.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... we are editing the page to comply with Wikipedia guidelines. Also, as a subpage of my Sandbox, would this still be deleted? --RLG_Editor 22:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlgeditor (talk • contribs)

Yes, if it's an unambiguous copyright violation it can not remain on any Wikipedia page. 76.248.145.23 (talk) 23:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because we can not find any copyrighted material on the page and we feel that we have responded to previous comments concerning promotional orientation. We feel that this page follows the guidelines as set forth by Wikipedia. The standard 'speedy deletion' text does not provide any pointers or examples of the text that is considered non-encyclopedic in nature. We would be happy to rework the page if some examples were provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlgeditor (talk • contribs) 21:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we"?--Bbb23 (talk) 23:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps "we" is Rlgeditor and Special:Contributions/Charlie6WIND? If so, then I would ask both editors to read WP:Conflict of interest, and refrain from writing about their company. Thanks, Captain Conundrum (talk) 09:10, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]