Search results
The page "Talk:Acid3/include/css/include/images/js/language-change.js" does not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for review, or you may create the page "Talk:Acid3/include/css/include/images/js/language-change.js" directly, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- This is an archive page for Talk:Acid3 I have changed the article to reflect this sentiment: "Acid3 is primarily concerned with ECMAScript and the DOM...65 KB (9,505 words) - 03:18, 2 March 2023
- anybody can post reliable sources and we can include this in the IE9 article. The BIG problem is that Acid3 is really popular and Opera and WebKit pass...84 KB (11,007 words) - 05:37, 3 June 2023
- section -- surely whether a browser supports CSS is more crucial than whether it scores 100 on the Acid3 test. Alternatively, it might make sense to split...116 KB (15,954 words) - 14:01, 22 June 2024
- Talk:Internet Explorer 10 (section ACID3 score)supporting ACID3 fully. If you want to add information on conformance scores I suggest you look at the Ecmascript testsuite or the W3C CSS testsuite which...54 KB (7,525 words) - 15:24, 15 February 2024
- passing acid3 (nor implementation of major specs tested by it, e.g., css3 and svg) were touted as focus of ie8 development, I think the image should not...37 KB (4,907 words) - 09:30, 1 February 2023
- Talk:Firefox/Archive 14 (section Acid3 and Standards)(therefore) better Acid3 results. However, it is not decided yet.Luiscubal (talk) 17:42, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Maybe we should change it to something like...202 KB (22,435 words) - 20:48, 12 March 2023
- ox-4-will-never-pass-the-acid3-test/ to http://www.conceivablytech.com/5430/products/why-firefox-4-will-never-pass-the-acid3-test/ Added archive https://web...149 KB (14,253 words) - 20:46, 12 March 2023