Talk:Active Channel

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). Microsoft Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Seeing that both Active Channel and Channel Definition Format are both stubs, and that the latter has only ever seen use for the former, I'd like to suggest that the CDF article be merged into the Active Channel article. // coldacid (talk|contrib) 17:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• support per nom. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• oppose. In the literature on the history of web syndication technology, CDF is widely discussed not because of its implementation in Active Channel, but as a predecessor to alternative formats, notably ScriptingNews and RSS. If the two articles are to be merged, I'd propose a merge of Active Channel into CDF. ARK (talk) 01:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Incidentally: CDF was also implemented in Microsoft's Active Desktop. ARK (talk) 01:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• I never got to play much with Active Desktop except to stick my own local pages on my desktop. I knew there was some sync/syndication from literature, but never really drew the connection to CDF since I was too busy manually making/updating CDF files for my website of the time. With the expanded scope of CDF in mind, a merger may be better in the opposite direction as you suggested, or it might even be better to leave them unmerged. // coldacid (talk|contrib) 02:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• CDF was prior art for web syndication technologies such as
  semantic web. The specification probably deserves its own article for the inspiration it provided to those more recent developments. Active Channel and Active Desktop, by contrast, are two separate ways of looking at pretty much the same thing, so I'd suggest that those two be merged. ARK (talk) 09:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa768137(v=vs.85).aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified one external link on Active Channel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101226233037/http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa768137(v=vs.85).aspx to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa768137(v=vs.85).aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]