Talk:Agostino Agazzari

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Music theory Start‑class

	project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Composer project review

I've reviewed this article as part of the

comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 17:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Stub or not

I'll refrain from inserting the music theory stub, but there is enough material out there that a reasonable amount could be added to amplify Agazzari's connection to music theory. If not stub, then it's certainly no better than start class. See Damschroder, Music Theory from Zarlino to Schenker."-- kosboot (talk) 03:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Agostino Agazzari/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years
, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s) Press [show] to view →
;Composers Project Assessment of Agostino Agazzari: 2024-04-24
This is an assessment of article Agostino Agazzari by a member of the Composers project, according to its assessment criteria. This review was done by Magicpiano.
If an article is well-cited, the reviewer is assuming that the article reflects reasonably current scholarship, and deficiencies in the historical record that are documented in a particular area will be appropriately scored. If insufficient inline citations are present, the reviewer will assume that deficiencies in that area may be cured, and that area may be scored down.
Adherence to overall Wikipedia standards (
Featured Article
status.

Origins/family background/studies

Does the article reflect what is known about the composer's background and childhood? If s/he received musical training as a child, who from, is the experience and nature of the early teachers' influences described?

ok

Early career

Does the article indicate when s/he started composing, discuss early style, success/failure? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed?

ok

Mature career

Does the article discuss his/her adult life and composition history? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed?

ok

List(s) of works

Are lists of the composer's works in WP, linked from this article? If there are special catalogs (e.g. Köchel for Mozart, Hoboken for Haydn), are they used? If the composer has written more than 20-30 works, any exhaustive listing should be placed in a separate article.

No works list.

Critical appreciation

Does the article discuss his/her style, reception by critics and the public (both during his/her life, and over time)?

ok

Illustrations and sound clips

Does the article contain images of its subject, birthplace, gravesite or other memorials, important residences, manuscript pages, museums, etc? Does it contain samples of the composer's work (as composer and/or performer, if appropriate)? (Note that since many 20th-century works are copyrighted, it may not be possible to acquire more than brief
non-free content policy
? (Adherence to these is needed for Good Article or Featured Article consideration, and is apparently a common reason for nominations being quick-failed.)

pass on images for brevity; no sound. If a manuscript page from his treatise could be found...

References, sources and bibliography

Does the article contain a suitable number of references? Does it contain sufficient inline citations? (For an article to pass
Good Article
nomination, every paragraph possibly excepting those in the lead, and every direct quotation, should have at least one footnote.) If appropriate, does it include Further Reading or Bibliography beyond the cited references?

Article has references; no inline citations.

Structure and compliance with WP:MOS

Does the article comply with Wikipedia style and layout guidelines, especially
WP:SIZE
? (Article length is not generally significant, although Featured Articles Candidates may be questioned for excessive length.)

ok, but lead might have another sentence or two.

Things that may be necessary to pass a
Good Article
review

Article requires more inline citations (
WP:CITE
)

Article lead needs work (
WP:LEAD
)

Article needs (more) images and/or other media (
MOS:IMAGE
)

Summary
Not bad for an article that has not =Agostino_Agazzari&diff=269968466&oldid=30887819 changed much in more than 3 years. Article feels brief, as if the bio of a high-born composer ought to have more info in it. A works list would be good, as would an image, and inline citations. Article is B-class. Magic♪piano 17:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 06:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)