Talk:Ambulocetidae

Mammals Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article says that the skeleton found of Ambulocetus was "very complete." This may be an overstatement. "Partially complete" would possibly be a better term. As well, the article says that there is only one other genus in the family, however, Himalayacetus is clearly listed as a species within the family. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.88.67 (talk) 22:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Updated. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]