Talk:Araguaian river dolphin

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brazil Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .CetaceansWikipedia:WikiProject CetaceansTemplate:WikiProject CetaceansCetaceans articles

Mammals Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Animal echolocation#Toothed whales|echolocation]] Anchor Toothed whales. The anchor (#Toothed whales) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

[1] Here ya go! :) Bananasoldier (talk) 03:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a bad article, but essentially all the information in it is taken from the primary source, so we don't gain much by citing it. WolfmanSF (talk) 05:40, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting the impression the population hasn't been recently discovered, we've known about it for ages but only this year found out/declared that it is a new species. So which species did we think it belonged to before? Article says it's an inia, and it says it's most closely related to the Amazon river dolphin. Although it doesn't specifically state it one could presume it was previously thought of as belonging to Amazon river dolphin species, but it should state this if it is the case, so we don't have to guess or presume. Carlwev (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. WolfmanSF (talk) 19:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also wondering who 'announced" this in 2014. Does the publication of an article make this "official"? Isn't there an international taxonomic society that determines these things? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 09:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, the publication of a peer-reviewed article proposing taxonomic changes makes it official, since it will have been reviewed by top experts in the field. However, that does not guarantee that everyone will agree. WolfmanSF (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Araguaian river dolphin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150106152733/https://www.marinemammalscience.org/species-information/list-of-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/ to https://www.marinemammalscience.org/species-information/list-of-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]