Talk:Belgaum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

May 2022

@

WP:BRD. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Those are not just unreliable source but if come and ask any old age members of the city they would reply you the same . I myself born and brought up in the city , so I know much better about it than any one. Look like you are against the marathi voice!? More eminence (talk) 13:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And about the MES article, whats the problem with you about the ideology they follow? They can follow any ideology who are u to stop them ? . Listen my dear friend you might be an expert in Wikipedia but I am an resident of the city so please I know what am I editing. You people just don't want marathi to be recognised by people and spread hatret More eminence (talk) 13:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@
WP:CIVILITY
when conversing, comments like "Look like you are against the marathi voice", "You people just don't want marathi to be recognised by people and spread hatret", will get you into trouble.
Third as for the
WP:NOINDICSCRIPT, Indian scripts are not allowed in article leads and infoboxes, This specific article is not a special case. It is done in every India-related article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
@More eminence: This falsification of source data is exactly the thing that can get you blocked. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok about the script of MES why are you editing the ideology? They can follow any ideology they want Why are you editing it ? 

More eminence (talk) 14:46, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@More eminence: If the 'Karnataka occupied Maharashtra' part you added here can be sourced then re add that with a citation. I removed it since it was unsourced and looked very much POV. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this an sufficient source to do so ?? More eminence (talk) 17:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/will-incorporate-karnataka-occupied-areas-into-maharashtra-uddhav/article33592882.ece More eminence (talk) 17:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@More eminence: Yeah you can use the above source to add the 'Karnataka occupied Maharashtra' part in Maharashtra Ekikaran Samiti I believe. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks brother! Can you please tell my why was image of Sambaji Maharaj removed from belgaum post ? More eminence (talk) 01:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Sambhaji statue located in Belgaum? The image description didn't say anything like that. Previously, I removed a similar image of a statue of Sambhaji located in another city. Only images of locations, buildings, statues, institutions from the city of Belgaum should be added. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ! Dharmaveer Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj chowk is the most important circle in the city . It's located at the centre of city and its a pride of city , I had uploaded an other photo just because it was clear You can check on Google maps (Dharmaveer Sambhaji Maharaj Chowk VG55+P6F, Kirloskar Rd, Raviwar Peth, Belagavi, Karnataka 590001) And one photo need to be uploaded is about the most famous garden in Belgaum which is an important landmark of the city ! With your all permission can I add that photo to ? Please verify on maps (Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaja Garden RGX8+2W3, Kapileswar Colony, Shahapur, Belagavi, Karnataka 590003,) Please guide me sir More eminence (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@More eminence: The image you posted before is a statue of Sambhaji in Pune. The full image is this. We need an image of Statue in the Dharamveer Chowk in Belgaum with proper licensing / free licensing.
As for the garden, please link it here in the discussion. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dharmaveer Chatrapati Sambaji Maharaj Chowk , Belagav.jpg Will this be the required image?

And about garden you said I really didn't get what you meant, so please can u tell me once more! More eminence (talk) 16:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is [1] More eminence (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@More eminence: I have added the Dharamveer Chowk image you provided in the infobox with proper formatting. As for the garden, I was asking whether you have that uploaded in commons? IF yes link it here like you did with above image. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First I really thank you brother for uploading that image and would like to say sorry also for being rude to you ! You have helped me understand Wikipedia in a better way and would always remember it

So about the Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj garden The images are [2] And [3] Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). More eminence (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image <ref>File:Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj garden belgaum 4.jpg<\ref> More eminence (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@More eminence:I've added this one, since the venue is a garden and should a bit of the surroundings per my opinion. Are these pictures clicked by you? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir ! Sir can this article of Deccan Herald be suitable for the edit of cuisine of belgaum . Like in Belgaum north karnataka food is not common,it's a mixture of Maharashtra,goa and karnataka. Also puran poli , vad pav etc which I had edited but you reversed it , please guide me whether those edits can be remade using this source? <red>https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.deccanherald.com/amp/melange-cuisines-717547.html<\ref> More eminence (talk) 02:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sry this one <ref>https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.deccanherald.com/amp/melange-cuisines-717547.html<\ref> More eminence (talk) 02:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

//www.google.com/amp/s/www.deccanherald.com/amp/melange-cuisines-717547.html More eminence (talk) 02:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the Cuisine section as per the content in the source you provided. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend What's the reason for the removal of karnataka occupied Maharashtra post? Is not a part of city or its same fake news to you ? Can you please tell me what's wrong with it ? More eminence (talk) 18:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk:Hello friend What's the reason for the removal of karnataka occupied Maharashtra post? Is not a part of city or its same fake news to you ? Can you please tell me what's wrong with it ? 

More eminence (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: Hello friend What's the reason for the removal of karnataka occupied Maharashtra post? Is not a part of city or its same fake news to you ? Can you please tell me what's wrong with it ? More eminence (talk) 18:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@More eminence: Check my revision [1] and the accompanying edit summary. The term was said by Thackeray in the source, so I've added it in the paragraph and did not remove it. It should not be part of the section header. Belgaum border dispute is enough, also we do not put sources in the headers per guidelines. Secondly, it should be part of the Government and politics main section since the dispute is a political one. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First thing let me tell you it's not just a political one , it's a dispute which even common people of the city aslo participate with any political intentions. It's a part of city since independence and city has got national recognition for this dispute which is between two States.Secondary when uddhav Thackeray says it he was a chief minister of a state which means it was a voice of 12 crore population of Maharashtra whom he represents and not a single person.Even this issue is acknowledged in the Maharashtra assembly also so it's not a small topic as you think . And yes link in header is wrong and I accept it but it should be a seperate header. Hope you got my point brother More eminence (talk) 18:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has its own rules which are different from the politics and other things of the region the Wikipedia article is dealing with. Secondly, this is an article on Belgaum city not an article on the border dispute, thus only major changes relating to it should be added. You have added unsourced content, it should be removed, or better expand it in the
Belgaum border dispute article with sources. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Sure I totally respect to the rules of Wikipedia.But just wanted that the dispute is an important aspect of belgaum city , it's not a simple political agenda for sure . Thanks for your all time support. But just wanted the header to be mentioned as "karnataka occupied Maharashtra" as well because this is the name by which local people reffer it to and even entire Maharashtra as reffer it as same , so I request you to kindly permit me to mention "karnataka occupied Maharashtra" in the header as well . And always you support and suggestions. More eminence (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, Karnataka-occupied Maharashtra or Karnataka-occupied areas is most likely used by Marathi speakers only, and not by Kannadigas or anyone else in the world most likely. So it is a POV term used by certain people, thus should not be allowed per our
WP:COMMONNAME), there is no reason why we should modify the subsection name into certain POV when the article's name itself doesn't use the phrase Karnataka-occupied Maharashtra. Karnataka-occupied Maharashtra as a phrase is only suitable in the prose of the section, which I have sourced and copy edited per Uddhav Thackeray' comment. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Ok I accept it sorry More eminence (talk) 23:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ File:Dharmaveer Chatrapati Sambaji Maharaj Chowk , Belagav.jpg
  2. ^ File:Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj garden belgaum 2.jpg
  3. ^ File:Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj garden 3.jpg

Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2022

Kindly request to add Veera Rani Kittur Chennamma and Veer Sangolli Rayanna photo along with Chatrapaji Shivaji Maharaj Amey400 (talk) 07:39, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. 💜  melecie  talk - 10:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2023

1. Wiki header should be changed to " Belagavi" and article informatio. should contain the unofficial name or old name Belagaum inside the article . It seems to be the other way round. 2. More edit requests will follow once the first one is rectified. 2601:40B:8402:4920:992A:7765:5EFB:E6BE (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: see
WP:ON small jars tc 16:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Requested move 12 March 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus is that Belgaum is still the

WP:COMMONNAME at this time. (non-admin closure) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 19:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Free Press Journal etc ... . ಹುಲಿ🐯 talk 20:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Oppose Wikipedia is a world-wide encyclopedia, and the
WP:Commonname is determined by what English speakers, the world over, most readily recognise. Local media do not reflect this world-wide situation, as most of their readership readily knows both names, Although only a very crude measure a Google search for Belguam gives 66.3 million hits, whereas Belgavi gives just 12 million - Arjayay (talk) 20:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
comment another reason to support move as per
Britannica :- https://www.britannica.com/place/Belagavi ಹುಲಿ🐯 talk 21:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Needs change of city name to Belagavi

The name of the city has been officially changed as Belagavi[2] on 1st November 2014 by Government of Karnataka, with approval of Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the section immediately above this one - there was a requested move discussion about this, which failed.
MrOllie (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
If not, change the name of this page Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No. It was decided not to do that in the RM discussion above.
MrOllie (talk) 17:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Change of title from Belgaum to Belagavi.

Majority of the English speakers use the name Belagavi in their conversations. It is now time to change the title of this page from Belgaum to Belagavi. 2409:40F2:1007:3A71:98F:9C80:3DA4:EA2B (talk) 08:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide the evidence for your claim - Arjayay (talk) 12:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Belgaum&oldid=1211971555"