Talk:Bill Blaikie

A news item involving Bill Blaikie was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 26 September 2022.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Canada: Manitoba / Politics Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba. This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Between 1969 and 1972 was Bill Blaikie really working for both the Army and the Railroad? That doesn't seem likely.

Blaikie just started the new parliament as deputy speaker, maybe someone who knows more about the position than I could type something up? Skuzabut 11:55 EST

Honorary Doctorate of Divinity at a special convocation ceremony, Sept. 14, 2007. wawruckhemmett —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wawruckhemmett (talk • contribs) 19:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took Blaikie's 2002 statement: "[The Queen} symbolizes for many the merits of a constitutional monarchy in which the head of state... is separate and apart from the ongoing political struggles of the day."[1] to be a sign of support for the system of constitutional monarchy. --

I take the words "for many" to imply a slightly different meaning. Blaikie's comment reads like a statement of fact regarding the views of monarchists, and not an advocacy of the same. CJCurrie (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I take the words in their proper context, which is a larger spoken tribute to the Queen. It certainly reads to me like someone who supports the monarchical system. --

Miesianiacal (talk) 19:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

That's one possibility, but it's worth noting that Blaikie's comments were made on the 50th anniversary of the Queen's ascension to the throne, at a time when all (federalist) parties represented in the HoC were more-or-less required to make official tributes of some sort. I suspect that Blaikie probably does support the monarchy (or at least doesn't oppose it), but I don't think we can take this largely ceremonial statement as a definitive interpretation of his opinions on the subject. CJCurrie (talk) 02:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm.. Well, the fact is his comments expanded beyond simply personal accolades and touched on the subject of the institution of the Crown, which I don't think was required in any way. But, a search (albeit a brief one via Google) brings up nothinhg further to link Blaikie to support for the monarchy. Alas, I will have to concede that there is still insufficient evidence to drop him in the monarchist category... for now. ;) --

Miesianiacal (talk) 04:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I have just modified one external link on Bill Blaikie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070318011822/http://www.ndp.ca:80/page/5017 to http://www.ndp.ca/page/5017

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]