Talk:CLC bio
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2007 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | |
This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance). |
Companies Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||
|
Denmark Low‑importance | |||||||
|
Untitled
CLCbio was acquired by Qiagen in 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.29.43.1 (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
request for deletion
This article was created by someone in Denmark, probably affiliated with the company. Their claims of "independent" publications mentioning their products consisted of one press release and one commercial convention where they were a paying attendee. This article is commercial spam and should be deleted.
no deletion
This is not spam, and the accusations are false. Both Bio-IT World and GenomeWeb are truly independent media - you can't buy an article and the articles linked we're of no such nature. However you can advertise in these, like you can in Nature or Science, but that doesn't make them less credible, does it? I think someone in New Zealand should sign their claims and back them up with valid arguments! Don G.
Advertising and notability
I agree with the original complainant. The advertising blurb needs to be replaced with a meaningful description of the company. "High-performance computing" in and of itself tells us nothing. "Garnering considerable positive attention" is pure weasel wordage. Apart from the name of the company, where it is and what it does, there's nothing here for wikipedia. and hence, I suggest