Talk:CLC bio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconCompanies Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconDenmark Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Untitled

CLCbio was acquired by Qiagen in 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.29.43.1 (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


request for deletion

This article was created by someone in Denmark, probably affiliated with the company. Their claims of "independent" publications mentioning their products consisted of one press release and one commercial convention where they were a paying attendee. This article is commercial spam and should be deleted.

no deletion

This is not spam, and the accusations are false. Both Bio-IT World and GenomeWeb are truly independent media - you can't buy an article and the articles linked we're of no such nature. However you can advertise in these, like you can in Nature or Science, but that doesn't make them less credible, does it? I think someone in New Zealand should sign their claims and back them up with valid arguments! Don G.

Advertising and notability

I agree with the original complainant. The advertising blurb needs to be replaced with a meaningful description of the company. "High-performance computing" in and of itself tells us nothing. "Garnering considerable positive attention" is pure weasel wordage. Apart from the name of the company, where it is and what it does, there's nothing here for wikipedia. and hence, I suggest

LEO Pharma, Bavarian Nordic, Santaris and Symphogen (to name a few) than this pointlessness. Daen (talk) 12:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]