Talk:Cisco Catalyst 6500
Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance). | ||
This article is supported by Computer hardware task force. |
Telecommunications | |||||||
|
comments
You should take the 'We' stuff out. Otherwise it is simply a cisco marketing slide.this is an encyclopedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.20.221.71 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
^^ It's an encyclopedia anyone's free to edit, so feel free to do so if you're upset by it. --Mattsday 01:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
What're peoples thoughts about the 'power supply inefficiencies'? Seems a bit of competitive FUD to me - the documents read more like sales pitches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.103.25.233 (talk) 18:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Page title
Why is the title 'Catalyst 6500' and not 'Cisco Catalyst 6500'. The page for Cisco Catalyst 1900 uses 'Cisco'. There should be consistency. FordneyPachelbel (talk) 20:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 18 August 2022
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved, as there has been no opposition since the proposed move. It adheres to the common name of the product and better aligns with other Cisco page names. (non-admin closure) Hey man im josh (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- There was also a discussion in 2011 to move Catalyst (switch) → Cisco Catalyst. As a result, it was moved.[2] 84.250.14.116 (talk) 10:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Banks, Ethan. "Cisco Catalyst 6800: Same Game, New Name". Network Computing. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
- ^ Special:Permalink/425538443#Requested move