Search results
Appearance
The page "Talk:Congressional Apportionment Amendment/include/images/usa.png" does not exist. You can click on "Talk:Congressional Apportionment Amendment/include/images/usa.png" to create the page directly, or you may create a draft and submit it for review, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- capita Senate apportionment, but an ability to rise above parochial interests and do what is right for the country as a whole. The 17th Amendment may be partly...103 KB (15,737 words) - 02:08, 22 March 2023
- mechanics Apportionment of electors Etc. (Note that although the structure here is sound, the content needs work. For example, the section of apportionment doesn't...152 KB (20,980 words) - 17:37, 14 May 2023
- majority of gerrymandered Congressional Districts -- rather than by the statewide popular vote. The Congressional District apportionment reform proposed by the...100 KB (13,664 words) - 17:36, 14 May 2023
- January 2006 (UTC) It is up to the states, absent congressional intervention. The 1842 Apportionment Bill, an Act of Congress, mandated the single-member...132 KB (18,396 words) - 13:29, 10 July 2024
- behind the March 3 date: While the 20th Amendment specifically gives noon as the start of the Congressional and Presidential terms, the ordinance of...110 KB (16,774 words) - 20:02, 2 February 2023
- Talk:United States Electoral College/Archive 12 (section What are the Electors Mentioned in the 17th Amendment?)included because the apportionment for 2022–2032 has not yet been made. When expected reallocation becomes established (codified) congressional reapportionment...138 KB (20,345 words) - 17:35, 14 May 2023
- Talk:National Popular Vote Interstate Compact/Archive 2 (section Is Congressional consent required?)(UTC) No, congressional approval is not required, because states can apportion electoral votes however they chose, even if this would include some of them...128 KB (19,691 words) - 15:57, 14 March 2024
- Talk:United States/Archive 62 (section Name of USA)states by the Seventeenth Amendment. This study is a useful wakeup call to expand the electorate and reform Congressional districting among corrupt state...187 KB (27,563 words) - 07:41, 30 May 2022
- understanding from the source that it was meant as Congressional voting hurdle equivalent to a constitutional amendment, with two-thirds of both houses required...133 KB (19,082 words) - 01:18, 17 November 2023
- decisions have anything to do with the aforementioned assertion, but with apportionment (or reapportionment), which in summary means that all voting districts...53 KB (8,049 words) - 05:59, 12 June 2022
- Talk:Income tax in the United States/Archive 1 (section Shouldn't the 2009 tax computation example include the "making work pay" tax credit?)(1916), the amendment did not expand the federal government's existing taxing power but rather removed any requirement for apportionment of income taxes...250 KB (38,700 words) - 05:29, 28 March 2022
- (corrected).png - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC) In the table it says Winner Takes All for California. I've read that each congressional district...200 KB (29,360 words) - 09:39, 22 August 2021
- as 3/5 of a person for voting representation of the South in Congressional apportionment.) After the Civil War, freedmen did tend to join the Republicans...125 KB (18,085 words) - 07:14, 4 March 2023