Talk:Crypturellus
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Layout
This page is a mess. Can I strike a motion to consolidate all subspecies information in the species pages? Crypturellus is a highly diverse genus with many subspecies citations. Including all of them on a single page, especially with distribution information, makes the page too cluttered and extremely painful to read. The constant distribution referencing is breaking tables at the bottom too.--Famedalupi (talk) 08:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think the page looks unreadable, it could however use more substance. I will try to add. speednat (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Crypturellus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160111195520/http://paleofile.com/ to http://www.paleofile.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160111195520/http://paleofile.com/ to http://www.paleofile.com/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.taxonomy.nl/Main/Classification/51327.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crypturellus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303222030/http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/TaxonTree.aspx?id=51327&tree=0.1 to http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/TaxonTree.aspx?id=51327&tree=0.1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)