Talk:Fortinet

Fortinet has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 27, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fortinet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Top-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with: AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information... Answer question about Same-origin_policy Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here. California: San Francisco Bay Area Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. CorporateM (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

Archives (index)

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present.

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article.

Please add the following sentence to “Recent History”.

• Specific text to be added or removed: In December 2022, telecoms
  Telefonica adopted Fortinet’s SD-WAN into their MSSP
  platforms.

Chervek, Emma (December 14, 2022). "Telefónica, ngena, Cirion Add Fortinet SD-WAN". SDxCentral. SDxCentral. Retrieved December 22, 2022. Fortinet's SD-WAN capabilities have been tapped by a slew of new managed security service providers (MSSPs) in an effort to provide secure connectivity services.

• Reason for the change: The telecoms are the most significant of a group of 5 companies to integrate the Fortinet SD-WAN technology into their offerings.

• References supporting change: https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/news/telefonica-ngena-cirion-add-fortinet-sd-wan/2022/12/

Johnwikiwelton (talk) 20:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Declined Per

WP:PROMO. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:09, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm Dylan Crutchfield and I will be COI requests on behalf of Fortinet from now on. DylanWikiCrutchfield (talk) 19:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This tag was bestowed on 27 October 2016, and with at least some merit at the time, but since then the article has descended back to the corporate marketing mess it was until a year before. Most glaringly, the "Legal disputes" section was removed and its content toned down and scattered throughout the article; instead was added an "Accomplishments in cybersecurity" section hailing achievements such as creating a research team, founding a trade group and "helping" to identify malware and apprehend 419'ers, whatever that means.

Short of a complete overhaul, I suggest that at least the Good article tag be revoked. 2001:8A0:5E59:9801:789C:1C84:8904:EE58 (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, will raise at GAR. Couruu (talk) 09:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

> In 2005, Fortinet created the FortiGuard Labs internal security research team.

While everything that is done is an accomplishment of some form I think creating a team in a company is hardly an achievement. Similar creating an "alliance" with another company is certainly an accomplishment, however more on the business than on the cyber security side.

In general that whole paragraph very much reads like an ad similar to what you would find in "About Us" sections. I think it should be rewritten or removed. Or at least be added to History. Then creating a team might make sense. Athaba (talk) 20:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For context, do you feel the Palo Alto Networks article should also be edited to remove any mention of the Unit 42 team? They do pretty much the same thing as Fortiguard Labs. In fact, both teams issue worldwide alerts for cybersecurity breaches and risks that are carried by multiple media outlets. With respect to a paragraph describing what a company does in conjunction with industry partners, that is of interest to the general public. After all, why have articles about all these companies if the articles don't describe what the companies are doing? Moving some of these points to History might make sense but I think first you should scan the other cybersecurity company articles and see if there is any consistency between your suggestion and how their information is presented. Michael Martinez (talk) 22:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]