Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Talk:godwin's_law js language change.jpg
The page "Talk:Godwin's law/js/language-change.js" does not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for review, or you may create the page "Talk:Godwin's law/js/language-change.js" directly, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- changed. The article needs to change to reflect that. --John (talk) 22:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC) I don't want to re-open Godwin's law territory - but actually...99 KB (14,809 words) - 02:03, 9 April 2019
- history. Freshacconci 20:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Firstly, congrats on failing Godwin's Law! Secondly the negative connotations of the parallel you draw is known...101 KB (14,867 words) - 02:17, 18 January 2023
- "hardly be called anti-Semites"? No. - Oh, boy. Aside from invoking Godwin's Law, this is serious hyperbole. Comparing Nazi tooth extraction to Crowley's...148 KB (24,762 words) - 21:29, 1 September 2019
- never brought before the Nuremberg Trials? (This might be an example of Godwin's law but is the most obvious example). JJARichardson (talk) 15:55, 6 August...98 KB (12,975 words) - 12:53, 1 February 2023
- or how many countries are so compared. Godwin's Law illustrates this clearly. As the WP article tells us, the law is invoked when someone makes "use of...133 KB (19,700 words) - 15:54, 29 January 2023
- css or js file (as suggested by Geni) but I'm not sure. Nil Einne (talk) 23:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Technicaly you can do it through changes to User:Tripledot/monobook...201 KB (27,217 words) - 20:58, 7 June 2022
- "Nazi-card" has been used. The article on Godwins Law for which you provided a link states that Godwin's Law is: "As an online discussion grows longer...217 KB (35,802 words) - 14:41, 3 October 2018
- Talk:Jill Stein/Archive 3 (section SashiRolls deletes Stein's response to NATO Baltic question, changes Brexit text (for the 3rd or 4th time AFTER having had his/her RFC rejected). Please revert.)and is meant to make JS appear "fringe". It is indeed interesting that there is still nothing on the page about climate change in the section called...199 KB (28,313 words) - 00:12, 4 September 2022
- Talk:Thomas Hobbes/Archive 1 (section Pending changes)that and see whether you can get a consensus on it. As to Hitler, see Godwin's law. Wikiain (talk) 02:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC) I don’t know who wrote...188 KB (27,866 words) - 16:46, 3 February 2023
- virtually universally to describe Stalin. We're not going the way of Godwin's law and reducing the term 'dictator' to a contentious label: it is what decades...190 KB (30,979 words) - 20:21, 7 June 2022
- readers or editors. --Storm Rider (talk) 07:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC) Godwin's law ;) --Descartes1979 (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC) Strongly Oppose...47 KB (7,344 words) - 19:01, 30 January 2023
- adoption of Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells positions and references to Godwin's Law in various guises. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC) I suggest...195 KB (29,191 words) - 16:25, 17 June 2022
- membership to distinguish, and they did for Bush and Pinochet. I won"t use Godwin's law (I condamn your ways to insult me with "Dutroux" allusions (as I have...104 KB (16,250 words) - 15:54, 28 September 2021
- Talk:Evolution/Archive 13 (section Changes)something that brings it to light. That settles the discussion. See Godwin's law :) Wyss 22:13, 21 February 2006 (UTC) "lib mods"? You make us sound like...118 KB (17,735 words) - 21:54, 29 January 2023
- Talk:Joseph Stalin/Archive 19 (section Lead changes)the use of prominent descriptors. We're not discussing neologisms or Godwin's law, but what sources actually say. Please don't confuse NPOV with rewriting...271 KB (40,228 words) - 15:42, 8 May 2020
- wants, but endorsing it is POV and using it as a basis to change the commonly accepted language that is used just about everywhere to describe the civil...140 KB (22,399 words) - 15:54, 30 January 2023
- out what you said. Regards, OTAVIO1981 (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC) JS Ayer, you know the rules of Wikipedia. You need to refute the claim that references...156 KB (23,301 words) - 10:28, 8 February 2024
- that. John Smith's 08:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Has anyone invoked Godwin's Law yet? --Sumple (Talk) 11:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Mib has already talked...210 KB (35,378 words) - 00:35, 30 January 2023
- Talk:Ethereum/Archive 1 (section SW Languages)Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Declaring_an_interest and I now see the on Talk:Godwin's law. This has clarified my question relating to precedent of having users's...192 KB (29,905 words) - 12:13, 8 May 2020
- not use a bot, I am just a very fast person who uses addons to his monobook.js, and User:Notinasnaid has clareified what i meant. SF could mean anything...103 KB (16,484 words) - 17:39, 15 March 2023