Talk:Henry Ford Hospital

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

National Register of Historic Places C‑class Mid‑importance

	project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Most

Most of this appears to be direct plagiarism from the Henry Ford website.--Compcons 19:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the stuff certainly appears to have come from the official website, but is not a direct copy. As a physician who works in the Henry Ford Health System I am aware of some of the history and corrected the founding date and the reference to John's Hopkins being the model. Srueckert 22:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject NRHP assessment

I've rated this article as C-class by the WikiProject NRHP guidelines. There's some good coverage of the history and the physical plant here. However, the guidelines include "No major issues with prose or references, and the article could be improved to GA-quality without too much additional work." This doesn't seem to be the case. There's a long unsourced section that reads like a press release for the hospital; the "History" section reads as though an editor was trying to cram in every accomplishment, however minor (lots of first-in-Michigan and even first-in-Detroit procedures); there are lots of very weak citations, taking us to a main hospital-history page but not linking to the URLs where the information can actually be found; and there needs to be a bit more on the NRHP nomination, explaining why it was selected for the Register. To my eye, fixing these would take more than "without too much additional work"; and if the article's being watched by an SPA with a connection to the hospital, correcting the excessive self-promotion might lead to disagreement that would have to be resolved before the stability necessary for a GA was achieved. There's GA potential here, but it would require some fairly ruthless cutting, possibly in the face of opposition. That being the case, I can't rate it above a C. Ammodramus (talk) 17:11, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Ford Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100922120318/http://henryford.com/body.cfm?id=41144 to http://www.henryford.com/body.cfm?id=41144

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]