Talk:Java Portlet Specification

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Needed introduction

This page *really* needs an introduction to explain the context and what the things are. contract is very vague and one of the two terms in the description is redlinked! 83.217.109.164 (talk) 16:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History of the different JSRs is needed too. Syced (talk) 06:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that

JSR 168 Portlet Catalog be merged into Java Portlet Specification. There is not enough content right now for two separate articles. Even if there was, catalogs of portlets are not something that are notable enough to require more than a section. Syced (talk) 06:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Agreed and  Done Klbrain (talk) 16:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Java Portlet Specification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portlet

The concept of

Java Applet, portlet should be distinct from the concept of Java's implementation. If they are discussed on the same page, the page title should be portlet and the Java Specification should be a subtopic. Ost (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]