Talk:LabVantage
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LabVantage article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
 | An email has been received at VRTS concerning some or all of the text on this page, and can be read by users with a VRTS account.
However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for the text. This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license, or the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published. For an update on the issue, please contact the user who added this template to the page, someone else with a VRTS account, or the VRT noticeboard. If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT volunteer, the text will be deleted. |
 | The WP:COIRESPONSE .
|
Contesting speedy deletion
I need help. I am trying to create an information page like ones made for LabVantage, Kleenex, and etc...
How do I know what is considered neutral or promotional? Can someone point me out to guidelines? Thanks.
I do have permission from LabVantage to post this up. I will have them send you an email to confirm. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Limsmaster (talk • contribs) 21:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, Limsmaster. I removed the information you posted in the article because in addition to being a ]
The article sounds like coming straight out of the LabVantage prospectus. Business rhetoric such as 'most advanced technology' or 'thrusts company to become number one', 'opened market to all continents except Antarctica' should not be used in the Wikipedia. I vote for total rewrite or deletion.38.122.126.58 (talk) 15:26, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Move? (2011)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Page moved to
- This is a LIMS provider that has changed its product and company name. Limsmaster (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per our guidelines on trademarks, we should follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, regardless of the preference of trademark owners. If anything, it should be "Labvantage" (only the "L" is capitalized). Zzyzx11 (talk) 16:40, 12 March 2011 (UTC)]
- Oppose a move to ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Updates for 2022
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi editors: I'm new to Wikipedia and created a user page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fuhrsd. I'm wondering if I can start to submit updated suggested edits to the current LabVantage page that brings it up to speed? They've had a lot of developments in recent years and I think we can offer some further definitions that can really help visitors and researchers understand and connect with the laboratory management area even more. Specifically, I'm wondering if I can start submitting sections one at a time here in my personal Sandbox section for you to review to restructure the current page into a series of scannable sections for the reader/researcher, starting with an Introduction section? And then moving on to additional sections, such as Company, Platform, LIMS/LIS, ELN, LES, SDMS, Services, and History? Our goal is not to be promotional - just factual - and we've tried to mirror the language and structure after similar software company listings we see on Wikipedia. I've published a first take at that first new section for the page, called Intro, at my personal sandbox (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fuhrsd/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1&preload=Template%3AUser+sandbox%2Fpreload?) for review prior to me submitting it to the actual LabVantage page, to make sure I'm on the right track. Thank you! Fuhrsd (talk) 14:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fuhrsd
- @WP:SOLUTION. This is an essay, not a Wikipedia policy, but it contains useful advice to avoid terms that really provide little meaning and serve only as promotional tools. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)]
- @Fuhrsd: You are more than welcome to submit proposals using the request edit template. After looking at your proposal in your sandbox, I have declined to add it in because it is uncited. Usually, an article's body is written first, then the lede can be written as a summary of the information included in the body of the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Wikipedia:SOLUTION. I edited my sandbox ((https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fuhrsd/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1&preload=Template%3AUser+sandbox%2Fpreload?) update for the Intro section and resubmitted it again for consideration after removing all instances of "solution" and replacing them with "software" as perhaps a better description. Also, my proposed copy does have references built-in as hyperlinks - the following terms are hyperlinked directly to Wikipedia's own definition pages for those terms: Electronic lab notebook (Electronic lab notebook); Laboratory information management system (Laboratory information management system); Laboratory informatics (Laboratory informatics); Artificial intelligence (Artificial intelligence); Machine learning (Machine learning); and Predictive analytics (Predictive analytics). Please advise if these edits would qualify the proposed Intro update if copied from the sandbox and submitted to the LabVantage Wikipedia page. Thank you! Fuhrsd (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)]
- Hi
- @Fuhrsd: You are more than welcome to submit proposals using the request edit template. After looking at your proposal in your sandbox, I have declined to add it in because it is uncited. Usually, an article's body is written first, then the lede can be written as a summary of the information included in the body of the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)