Talk:Lady Like (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleLady Like (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starLady Like (song) is part of the Lady Like series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 5, 2022Good article nomineeListed
October 28, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 8, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ingrid Andress came up with "Lady Like" after being rejected by a man when she brought politics up?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Lady Like (song)/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 21:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Infobox

  • Initially release date as a single, not the re-release date
    • If I do this, then the year below the singles chronology section changes to 2019, which makes it look weird since the previous single was released in 2020. Sebbirrrr (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Then change that too. Its always the initial date of release and not the re-release. Ofc mention the re-release but not on the infobox MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace hlist with bullet points per Template:Infobox song

 Done

Lead

  • in October 2020 → in October 2020 by the aforementioned label
  • about politics and also → about politics. She also
  • as inspirations → as inspiration
  • forty on Billboard's Country Airplay chart and on the Hot Country Songs chart → forty on both Billboard's Country Airplay and Hot Country Songs chart
  • and was certified gold by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) → It was also certified gold by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA).

 Done

Background and release

  • songwriter Kara DioGuardi → American songwriter Kara DioGuardi
  • company Arthouse Entertainment → company, Arthouse Entertainment,
  • and she began → and began
  • Andress' contribution to two songs, namely Charli XCX's "Boys" → Andress' contribution to Charli XCX's "Boys"
  • Dates of the release of the aforementioned songs between brackets
  • It was initially released → It was released
  • and streaming → and streaming by Warner Music Nashville
  • More Hearts Than Mine → add release date between brackets
  • country radio stations → country radio stations by Warner Music Nashville

 Done

Composition and lyrics

  • lasting for 3 minutes and 14 seconds → you don't need this, it can be removed
  • not acting feminine and that the → not acting feminine. The

 Done

Reception and commercial performance

  • praised Andress' lyricism and vocal delivery and described the song as → praised Andress' lyricism and vocal delivery. She described the song as
  • the lyrics and stated that "Lady Like" → the lyrics. Stephens stated that "Lady Like"
  • of the Week" and regarded → of the Week". He regarded
  • in his review of Andress' debut album → remove

 Done

Music videos

  • and she wanted her fans of being capable of seeing where she's "now as a human". → She wanted her fans of being capable of seeing where she's "now as a human."

 Done

Reception

  • and that she performed in the music video "all with [a] big dose of 'ladylike' poise" →. Parton added that she performed in the music video "all with [a] big dose of 'ladylike' poise"
  • Writing for ABC News Online, Houghton described Andress making way through gender stereotypes in "eclectic, yet subtle ways" in the second video and called the video "elegant" → Regarding the second video, writing for ABC News Online, Houghton described Andress making way through gender stereotypes in "eclectic, yet subtle ways". Houghton found it to be "elegant".
  • BroadwayWorld's Sarah Jae Leiber stated that Andress is "encouraging men and women everywhere" to be themselves "through stunning visuals". → see below

 Done

Live performances

  • In the same year she performed the song → In the same year she sang the track
  • The singer performed the song → The singer also performed "Lady Like"
  • Can you replace the Youtube and Vevo sources? They might not be quite stable.
    • I couldn't find any sources to replace them with unfortunately. Sebbirrrr (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't worry then. Just be sure they are archived. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

Credits and personnel

  • Re-title to personnel per personnel
  • Usually the credits taken from the album liner notes have more personnel, incluing instruments, enginneers, mixing, mastering
    • That's all the liner notes offer regarding the credits. Sebbirrrr (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    On the album article they refer more people that contributed to this song with instrumentation MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fixed, found the song's page on AllMusic. Sebbirrrr (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

Track listing

  • Use spaced en dash,  –

 Done

Charts

  • Fine

Certifications

  • Fine

Release history

  • Fine

References

  • Overlink of Billboard and Rolling Stone
  • Not sure if Sounds Like Nashville is a reliable source, but Chris Parton has written for Rolling Stone and Taste of Country, so good enough
  • BroadwayWorld is not regarded as a reliable source since some of their news are taken from label press releases, please replace the information or remove it
  • Spotcheck: 4, 7, 9, 15, 21, 22 and 23 all fine

 Done

Overall

  • Some sentences have to be smaller.
    • Are you referring to sentences in any particular section? Sebbirrrr (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I fixed that, when reviewing the article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have seven days to address the issues. Let me know once you are done. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • @MarioSoulTruthFan: thanks a lot reviewing the article. I've addressed your comments. Sebbirrrr (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      I will see the changes you conducted and reply to your questions. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Sebbirrrr Just fix the infobox and reply on the personnel section. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • @MarioSoulTruthFan: I've changed the personnel section, could you see if I linked everything properly? The thing with the infobox is that the year in the singles chronology of the song is dependent on the date I put in. I can't change the year myself. I think adding a note would be better than seeing that a single released in 2019 was released after a single released in 2020, which looks weird. Sebbirrrr (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        Some stuff is obvious like the guitar and vocals so no need for wikilink. You can change anything in the article, per Template:Infobox album#released, "Only the earliest known date that the album was released should be specified; later release dates (incl. re-issues) can be mentioned in a Release history section." Works for songs as well. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Sebbirrrr (talk). Self-nominated at 20:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.
Overall: Interesting article and hook overall that satisfies all criteria for DYK. Good to go. JJonahJackalope (talk) 01:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]