Talk:Macedonian denar
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the disclaimer
The disclaimer is a legitimate Wikipedia convention and was agreed by consensus in
- That discussion is about the Republic of Macedonia article only. bogdan ʤjuʃkə | Talk 06:09, 27 July 2005 (UTC)]
- This article didn't even have a discussion page until four days ago, so the convention has been imported from the main article.--Theathenae 06:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- If you two can't resolve the dispute normally, we can simply lock the article and let others decide. Might be the best call, actually. Either way, could you stop this lame edit war? It's cluttering up my watchlist needlessly. ;p Nightstallion 07:27, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- OK. In the section below are the opinions of the two editors (me and Naive cynic) that are against the disclaimer.
- This article didn't even have a discussion page until four days ago, so the convention has been imported from the main article.--Theathenae 06:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Calling the currency the Macedonian denar and the country the Republic of Macedonia without a disclaimer is tantamount to endorsing a particular POV in the naming dispute.--Theathenae 09:41, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- What POV? Everyone calls this currency Macedonian denar!
Against the disclaimer
There are many controversial terms, but a discussion about a controversy should be discussed only in the article dedicated to this, not in every article where the term appears.
Also, Wikipedia by default does not endorse any part in any conflict, so there is no point in putting a disclaimer about an "official position". bogdan ʤjuʃkə | Talk 07:49, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Names you mention appear in thousands of articles in Wikipedia. It is utterly pointless to add such disclaimer in every context they appear, especially considering the fact, that other similar naming controversies exist.
As a minor point, the naming dispute is not between Athens and Skopje, but between countries, i.e. Greece and Macedonia. -- Naive cynic 14:46, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- The dispute is between two states; using the name of a country's capital city to denote its government is commonplace. There is nothing wrong with the disclaimer, unless you're promoting the notion that the name of the southernmost former Yugoslav republic is not a matter of international dispute.--Theathenae 15:33, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
I don't see the need for the disclaimer. The dispute can be read about by anyone who clicks on the link to
- Yes. It's simply off-topic here. This article is not about the naming dispute. bogdan | Talk 20:43, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
I think the disclaimer should be scrapped - it's just not appropriate to have it in every article mentioning the country. Put the reader first. If people want to read about the political status of the country then they will go to the relevant page. If they want to read about things like lakes or coinage of the country then the page shouldn't be going on about political status. And if some kind of footnote of this kind has to stay in (perhaps in articles closely related to political status) then it should be shorter (with just one link) and better worded. An encyclopedia merely describes, it doesn't "endorse" things. --Cjnm 09:18, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Using the terms Republic of Macedonia and Macedonian(s) without a disclaimer is by definition endorsing a particular point of view in the dispute, because the use of these terms is precisely what the dispute is about. The sole purpose of the disclaimer is to make clear that despite the use of these terms, Wikipedia remains neutral in the dispute. At the moment, the removal of the disclaimer means that one point of view is being favoured over another.--Theathenae 10:53, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Protected
The amount of reverts here is ridiculous. Everyone is in danger violating, and probably has at some time or another, the
Since no progress was achieved since the article was locked, I created a poll page, so we get to a final result valid for all articles in Wikipedia that mention the
The poll is at Talk:Macedonian denar/Vote. bogdan | Talk 19:03, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Rather than jump into another rather meaningless nationalistic vote contest, I'd suggest it would be much better for both sides to try to attract some editors who are neutral to this whole topic and see what they think. Hopefully your listing on Wikipedia:Current surveys will achieve that. I'll give my point of view for what it's worth. --Cjnm 08:52, 17 August 2005 (UTC)]
NPOV - Against the disclaimer
The poll is only making a obvious absurd request legitimate, as it is obvious that the current For the disclaimer vote is composed exclusively by Greeks. It will only prove (again, as it did in the Macedonians/Macedonian Slavs poll) that:
- Greeks on Wikipedia are far more numerous than Macedonians and
- The neutral admins don't give a damn about this issue, generally speaking
Should I address it to the Turkish, Serbian, Bosnian, Croatian, Slovenian or Russian Wikipedia to vote Against the disclaimer just to "prove" "whose tribe is bigger"? A poll would be a good method to resolve technical issues, or even more sensitive issues, if we assume that all participants in the poll are zealous protectors the NPOV policy and its values. However, I am a firm believer, that polling does not apply to Balkan related sensitive issues (when it comes to nationalistic debates people here are actually not respecting basic human rights, let alone NPOV policy)
As I am already listening Theathenae's voice yelling "Greeks are people, too!" I will try to explain my standpoint as much as possible these days. (I'm in a middle of an exam session):
The content of the disclaimer
Wikipedia hasn't got an official position on anything, except on its policies. There is no need for further stressing that Wikipedia hasn't got official position on everything that is a matter of dispute. That is absurd. If Wikipedia accepts this disclaimer, then there would be a need to put a simillar disclaimer on every article mentioning the
Moreover, the use of Macedonian(s) in
Also, I think that is somewhat hypocritical from the users that wish to add this "no official position" disclaimer to every article , and at the same time using, IMHO, cheap tricks such as Former Yugoslav
NPOV issues
Citing
- "Bear in mind that Wikipedia is descriptive, not prescriptive. We cannot declare what a name should be, only what it is. Suppose that the people of Maputa oppose the use of the term "Cabindan" as a self-identification by another ethnic group. In this instance, the Cabindans use the term in a descriptive sense: that is what they call themselves. The Maputans oppose this because they believe that the Cabindans have no moral or historical right to use the term. They take a prescriptive approach to the term, arguing that it should not be used.
- Wikipedia should not attempt to say which side is right or wrong. However, the fact that the Cabindans call themselves Cabindans is objectively true – both sides can agree that this does in fact happen – whereas the claim that the Cabindans have no moral right to that name is purely subjective and is not a question that Wikipedia can, or should, decide."
Now, that example is perhaps better to use in the
According to the same article the proposed mechanism to deal with this "naming dispute" would be:
Criterion Option 1
Macedonian DenarOption 2
Fyromian Denar/Slav Macedonian Denar
1. Most commonly used name in English 1 0 2. Current official name of entity † 1 0 3. Current self-identifying name of entity † 0 0 1 point = yes, 0 points = no. Add totals to get final scores.
† Use English translation of name, where available
Any comments? I won't be able to answer all the replies, because of the above stated reasons. (Neutrals, please involve in this debate) --FlavrSavr 03:36, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- The currency of the country whose provisional name, according to the Ceylon, until its name was changed to Sri Lanka. Then everyone switched. Wikipedia should stand for clarity of information, and should not take a stand, implicit or explicit, on unresolved issues. We Greeks resent your country's attempt to monopolize the name Macedonia and its derivatives. We feel it is a thinly disguised attempt to appropriate a history and a culture which does not belong to you. Look at the Culture of Macedonia article as an example: is this what has happened to Macedonia culturally in all its millennia-long history? Your country had to change its flag (!) and change its constitution (!), and by doing so it admitted that both of these issues (hugely important for any country) were offensive to its international relations. Does this mean that your country has learnt its lesson? I don't think so. Just a few days ago it threw the Archbishop of the Serbian Orthodox Church in prison for ... performing a baptism! The aging prelate is not even allowed to have a Bible in his prison cell. This is not the behavior of a modern, Western-style republic that respects the rule of law. This smacks of Stalinist-style suppression. Witness the constant whining of your fellow countrymen, about how evil Greeks, Bulgarians, Serbs and Albanians hate your country. Bulgarians consider your language the same as their own, Albanians want a chunk of your land, Serbs resent your throwing Archbishop Jovan in jail, and Greeks, well you know .... I am not trying to offend you by saying this, so do not take it personally: there is an American saying that goes "if you meet three a**holes every day, maybe it's you who's the a**hole". Think about it. Chronographos 11:17, 21 August 2005 (UTC)]
- The currency of the country whose provisional name, according to the
Nationalist issues...
Perhaps you should check the article named
- Strawman arguments. Chronographos 23:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)]
- Yeah, as if you offered real arguments to refute. You think that the article itself shouldn't be named Macedonian Denar, but Denar instead: fine. Besides what the hell are you talking about: the opening line of the article is (quote): "The United States dollar, or American dollar". And since we are are there, why does this Wikipedia refer to the Republic of China as such? (with no disclaimer) --FlavrSavr 02:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)]
- Yeah, as if you offered real arguments to refute. You think that the article itself shouldn't be named Macedonian Denar, but Denar instead: fine. Besides what the hell are you talking about: the opening line of the article is (quote): "The United States dollar, or American dollar". And since we are are there, why does this Wikipedia refer to the
"This name may eventually change." Every naming of a country, or anything may eventually change. Should that mean that we should stick a disclaimer to everything? Besides, it clear that only the name of the republic is officially disputed. Your argument that every international institution, (including the UN), government, most major news outlets, and as well encyclopedias refer to Macedonians and the Macedonian language as "Macedonians" and "Macedonian language" because they have to refer to them somehow until the naming dispute (which again, formally inflicts only the name of the republic) is resolved, doesn't give an answer why Wikipedia should refer to them somehow different. (actually, the only argument is, "we Greeks, resent that") IF the changes that you were talking about do occur, THEN we might consider using other terms than those.
- Your argumentation hinges on the claim that somehow your people's self-acknowledged right to name themselves however they wish is superior to the Macedonian Greeks' self-acknowledged right that they are true Macedonians as well as the rightful cultural and linguistic heirs of the long Macedonian history before Paionia, the original ancient name of the area. It is what a beautiful flower was named after. I know you have no connection to the Ancient Paionians, but their descendants are not around anymore, therefore they will not be bothered. Whereas the descendants of the Ancient Macedonians are. Chronographos 23:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)]
- Again, what are you talking about? We trying to monopolize the name? Did RoM somehow objected to the naming of the three Greek provinces as Macedonia? Feel free to build thousand Alexander statues. Feel free to issue your own Macedonian Euro. Did I ever mentioned that I object that Macedonians of Greece shouldn't be referred to as Macedonians, as well? Did I ever claimed that we are same as the Ancient Macedonians? No, Chronographos. I didn't. Our people's self-acknowledged right to name themselves however they wish is guaranteed by the Universal Charter of Human rights [[5]], quote - Everyone has the right to a nationality. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality. Our nationality is called "Macedonian". Greek Macedonians are not a separate nationality from the Greeks, and that is a fact. If they actually were, then we would have had a real problem. Their self-acknowledged right that they are true Macedonians as well as the rightful cultural and linguistic heirs of the long Macedonian history before Republic of China as such. --FlavrSavr 02:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)]
- Again, what are you talking about? We trying to monopolize the name? Did RoM somehow objected to the naming of the three Greek provinces as Macedonia? Feel free to build thousand Alexander statues. Feel free to issue your own Macedonian Euro. Did I ever mentioned that I object that Macedonians of Greece shouldn't be referred to as Macedonians, as well? Did I ever claimed that we are same as the Ancient Macedonians? No, Chronographos. I didn't. Our people's self-acknowledged right to name themselves however they wish is guaranteed by the Universal Charter of Human rights [[5]], quote - Everyone has the right to a nationality. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality. Our nationality is called "Macedonian". Greek Macedonians are not a separate nationality from the Greeks, and that is a fact. If they actually were, then we would have had a real problem. Their self-acknowledged right that they are true Macedonians as well as the rightful cultural and linguistic heirs of the long Macedonian history before
- Your argumentation hinges on the claim that somehow your people's self-acknowledged right to name themselves however they wish is superior to the Macedonian Greeks' self-acknowledged right that they are true Macedonians as well as the rightful cultural and linguistic heirs of the long Macedonian history before
Your argument that every international institution, (including the UN), government, most major news outlets, and as well encyclopedias refer to Macedonians and the Macedonian language as "Macedonians" and "Macedonian language" because they have to refer to them somehow until the naming dispute (which again, formally inflicts only the name of the republic) is resolved, doesn't give an answer why Wikipedia should refer to them somehow different. (actually, the only argument is, "we Greeks, resent that")
"What you Greeks resent" and the situation of human rights (that are indeed not rosy, but the situation is Greece, the "birthplace of democracy", is far from rosy, as well) I mentioned above is not an argument against the NPOV arguments considering the disclaimer I mentioned above. "We Macedonians resent many aspects of Greek foreign and internal policy" but that is not an argument to put a Wikipedia disclaimer on every god damn term or aspect that we dislike. Those are arguments that are discussed/disputed in another articles. Various aspects of the dispute between Greece and Macedonia are not subject of this debate, and you are only trying to draw the attention away from the subject of this discussion - that being the disclaimer.
- See above Chronographos 23:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
To summarize, your arguments against the NPOV aspects I mentioned above can be put in only only sentence - "Those people are a**holes, don't name them Macedonians." Here's what the author of this poll thinks about how "a**hole" we are:
- See Strawman Chronographos 23:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)]
- Saw Strawman --FlavrSavr 02:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)]
- Saw
- See
- You are right that the poll was not a good idea, since the NPOV is not subject to negotiations, but I have no way to remove those disclaimers: the Greeks keep reverting them and the rest of world avoids entering in the negotiations of Balkan issues like the plague. I was hoping that the poll would attract some people, but instead it attracted the same old Greeks vs. non-Greeks. bogdan | Talk 19:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Every non-Greek so far, has either voted against, or neutral concerning this issue. Perhaps you should think about it, as well.
- That's simply because just about everyone doesn't care, except you and us. Allow me to consider your "neutral" vote as a rather disingenuous trick. You are far from neutral. You know it and I know it. This is just a touchy-feely game about plucky poor "Macedonians" bullied around by loud-mouthed Greeks. It may work, you know. Chronographos 23:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Chronographos, I never claimed I was neutral. That is precisely why I am asking neutrals to engage in this debate. So far, they tend to disagree with the disclaimer idea. --FlavrSavr 02:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- Before personal attacks, read the rest of the section title. There are "abstain" votes there as well as "neutral" votes. Tomer TALK23:39, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
- "Bad faith"? I just call it "survival tactics". I may not endorse it, but I understand why it happens. It's not for me to pass judgement, but I like to call a spade a spade. By profession, I know passive-aggressive behavior when I see it. I can deal with it, treat it (for a fee), but this does not mean I have to like it. Chronographos 23:59, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- That's simply because just about everyone doesn't care, except you and us. Allow me to consider your "neutral" vote as a rather disingenuous trick. You are far from neutral. You know it and I know it. This is just a touchy-feely game about plucky poor "Macedonians" bullied around by loud-mouthed Greeks. It may work, you know. Chronographos 23:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
BTW, isn't you who said that "Obvious as it is that Wikipedia cannot dictate international policy, it is equally obvious that polling does not define truth, regardless of the outcome"? --FlavrSavr 22:24, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- I stand by every word. Chronographos 23:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
I believe it's plain and simple. Let's suppose that your country reaches an agreement with Greece about the naming dispute, and your country decides to be called with a name different than Macedonia, for example NewName. Then, your currency will be renamed to NewNamian Denar and the disclaimer will have no place. The reasons for the existance of the disclaimer on the Denar wiki or elsewhere, are the same reasons that support the disclaimer in
- Please read What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball. --FlavrSavr 02:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- I've also read that wikipedia is not a propaganda machine. I thought my above comment on the term Macedonia and the related terms was crystal clear. MATIA 15:56, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, but what if we suppose that the Republic of Macedonia doesn't change its name and reaches a billateral solution of the problem? As for the propaganda machine, you'll be surprised that no one of the people that actually defended the Republic of Macedonia naming of the article is of Macedonian nationality. --FlavrSavr 19:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- First of all about the propaganda: I've never implied nor imagined that all those people (i'm not sure about which one article) were all from the same nationality. Let me clarify the propaganda a little bit - WP is not for propaganda, but WP is for history and facts, let's say that facts and propaganda as the two opposite things. So, if that denar is called macedonian, the term macedonian is part of the political naming dispute or part of the negotiations and I said before that if the country name change then the currency name (and anything else related) will change too. What if, one way or the other, the name stays? In that case the terms will be officially recognized, yet some historical facts will not change. If the naming dispute is over, shall we erase from WP all the sections about it? Or will we have some paragraphs statings the facts? I 'm guessing that the second will happen: there was a dispute between the two countries for 17 years, it ended that way etc etc. One other fact, that we already have is the pre-modern (ancient, byzantine, whatever) usage of the name. These are facts too so they should have their place in the encyclopedia. That's what I said about propaganda and I hope I've clarified it by now. MATIA 20:29, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- I've also read that wikipedia is not a propaganda machine. I thought my above comment on the term Macedonia and the related terms was crystal clear. MATIA 15:56, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- FYROM faces are different. That they are not willing to confront them explains why this country is in the desperate financial situation it is. Chronographos 19:32, 22 August 2005 (UTC)]
- I do know exactly what I am doing, that is, giving factual arguments (Wikipedia:Naming dispute) that are relevant to the subject/discussion, not inventing (like you do), arguments, that are completely irrelevant to the dispute - that is Macedonians being poor brainwashed totalitarian red scum, human rights issues... What else you have in stock? --FlavrSavr 02:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)]
- Nothing is irrelevant, my dear FlavrSavr, and nothing of what I said is untrue. The issues discussed did not appear out of the blue: they are the results of human actions, and they have motives and backgrounds that need to be analyzed if such patterns are to be understood correctly. I know this makes you feel uncomfortable, but life is tough sometimes. Chronographos 09:52, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- See appeal to motive (you have given an excellent example!). I don't want to go the Greek motives behind this, they are irrelevant really (yet evident on the poll). --FlavrSavr 11:57, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, "this type of argument may be a logical fallacy". The operative word is "may". Chronographos 12:28, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- See appeal to motive (you have given an excellent example!). I don't want to go the Greek motives behind this, they are irrelevant really (yet evident on the poll). --FlavrSavr 11:57, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- Nothing is irrelevant, my dear FlavrSavr, and nothing of what I said is untrue. The issues discussed did not appear out of the blue: they are the results of human actions, and they have motives and backgrounds that need to be analyzed if such patterns are to be understood correctly. I know this makes you feel uncomfortable, but life is tough sometimes. Chronographos 09:52, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- I do know exactly what I am doing, that is, giving factual arguments (
- Please read What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball. --FlavrSavr 02:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
my humble "neutral" position on all this would be that "'Macedonian denar' is the official currency of the Republic of Macedonia." is perfectly permissible; there are no Greek Macedonian denars that could be confused with it, the Greek Macedonians paying their bus fare in Drachmes Euros. Also seeing the currency symbol is MKD, "Macedonian denar" is simply the name the Skopje government saw fit to give their money. Hey, I use
- You are inverting the issue here, UN intervenes and sponsors negotiations to resolve the unresolved disputes. The "Republic of Tirol" launches a PR campaign portraying itself as a plucky little country harrassed by big bullying Austria, and a "Tyrolean" user named "FlavoreSavore" gets extremely worried because "The English Wikipedia, and its mirror sites are the most important generators of the Macedonian Slavs term on the net, which is much unfortunate, because it makes the term more "common" than it actually is.". In other words, it's ok for Wikipedia to reflect Google, but Google reflecting Wikipedia???? Noooo, perish the thought! Chronographos 12:28, 29 August 2005 (UTC)]
- "What's wrong with you, imagining hypothetical situations? Are you turning into FlavrSavr or something?" --FlavoreSavore 19:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- I am illustrating with an example. I know it makes you uncomfortable. Chronographos 19:46, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- That macedonian-slavs-wikipedia-and-google thing. I've tried on google "macedonian slavs -wikipedia" and I got about 30% less results. Yet it seems that other sites, unrelated with WP mention that term and some of them have a .mk domain. MATIA 20:33, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- I am illustrating with an example. I know it makes you uncomfortable. Chronographos 19:46, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- "What's wrong with you, imagining hypothetical situations? Are you turning into FlavrSavr or something?" --FlavoreSavore 19:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- You are inverting the issue here,
Indeed, but most of them use the term in a clearly medieval and ancient context, namely, Slavs that inhabited the region of Macedonia. Some of term were assimilated into what will become the Greek nation, some of them were assimilated into what will become the Bulgarian nation, while some of them were assimilated into what will become the Macedonian nation. --FlavrSavr 13:57, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Also, because some of the participants of this discussion seem to believe that I am somehow IMAGINING that Macedonians (out of vanity, or whatever) find the "Macedonian Slavs" label insulting, I would like to provide with you with this link - [6] - to cite: Macedonian citizens have sent more than 210,000 postcards to the Council of Europe supporting the use of that country's constitutional name Republic of Macedonia, "Utrinski vesnik" reported on 8 April. The postcards reading "Say Macedonia," "Call me by my name!" and "Don't you FYROM me!" were printed by a group of NGOs after the Council of Europe recently decided to refer to the Macedonian language as "Macedonian (Slavic)" and to Macedonian nationals as "persons from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" in official documents. --FlavrSavr 13:57, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
about names
The thing is that there are about 2.000.000 Macedonian Slavs (to use the name of that wiki) and a few more than that, about 2 and a half Macedonian Greeks. The first guys live in your country, and the second guys live in my country. And since those two have the same name but are not the same thing, we wouldn't want anyone to be confused, right? Shouldn't we have that in our mind when, regardless our positions or anything, we try to find a working way? MATIA 20:41, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
I understand that, but with all due respect, I don't see how come referring to Macedonians (nation, ethnicity, nationality, people) can make a significant confusion between them and the wider region. Similarly, I can't understand how Macedonian Slavs, Slav Macedonians or whatever, doesn't create confusion between them and the other Slavic speaking people in the region, namely, the Bulgarians. Also, is it by accident or what, that all relevant encyclopaedias (except MSN Encarta), all relevant international institutions, all governments (except Greece and Cyprus), most media outlets don't use the term "Macedonian Slavs"? How come only Wikipedia needs that term? --FlavrSavr 13:31, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Vote for deletion
See:
Unprotected
This article seems to have been protected from editing since August 3--nearly six weeks! I cannot believe that a Wiki can consider editors so dangerous that they must not be permitted to edit an article for so long, so I've unprotected it. --Tony SidawayTalk 08:41, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
Article location
As can plainly be ascertained by anybody,
Not really, we have
- The fact remains that Wikipedia does not call this country (simply) American dollar is that there are other countries that can and do call themselves American. The same disambiguation should apply here.--Theathenae 12:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)]
- The World Bank would appear to disagree with you Theathenae. Macedonian denar is this currency's name. Why don't we move Wikipedia:Naming conflict, where you will see that Macedonian denar is the appropriate name. REX 13:02, 29 October 2005 (UTC)]
- Well, I guess we could always use Denar on its own, considering no other country uses that name.--Theathenae 13:02, 29 October 2005 (UTC)]
- Sounds acceptable. REX 13:03, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- With appropriate references to the other historical uses of the name, as per the current content of Denar.--Theathenae 13:06, 29 October 2005 (UTC)]
- Yes. You do realise that a consensus must be formed though. REX 13:08, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- If you can agree with me, denar as a Roman currency needs to be changed, as the Latin name was in fact denarius - which has a separate article - not denar. I know nothing of the Croatian or Hungarian denar of the Middle Ages, nor whether they weren't perhaps written or pronounced somewhat differently.--Theathenae 13:12, 29 October 2005 (UTC)]
- If you can agree with me,
- Yes. You do realise that a consensus must be formed though. REX 13:08, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- With appropriate references to the other historical uses of the name, as per the current content of
- Sounds acceptable. REX 13:03, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, I guess we could always use
You know that if this page is moved to
Page move reversions
I've locked the article against moves and given REX and Theathenae 24 hours for 3RR, the content being reverted being the title itself. (And if 3RR doesn't explicitly mention moves, it should. You both knew exactly what you were doing.) I don't care in the slightest what the article title ends up as, you can thrash that out yourselves - David Gerard 13:26, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- It does mention moves: Reverting doesn't only mean taking a previous version from history and editing that. It means undoing the actions of another editor, and may include edits that mostly undo a previous edit and also add something new, page moving, admin actions such as protection, etc. bogdan | Talk 13:34, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Requested move
Reason: FYROM denar is a made-up name with little or no usage in the outside world, where this currency is almost universally referred to as the Macedonian denar.
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
- Support as the proposer of this move. --Tony SidawayTalk 13:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support bogdan | Talk 13:56, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support GrandfatherJoe (talk • contribs) 14:27, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support NSR (talk) 15:09, 29 October 2005 (UTC)]
- Support Izehar 15:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Actually the article was at FYROM denar. --FlavrSavr 16:41, 29 October 2005 (UTC)]
- Support There are no current "former money" in the world, as we all know. This is senseless. Bomac 17:52, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. That is its name. Nationalism does not override naming conventions. —Charles P. (Mirv) 19:15, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support It is quite senceless to tal about money does not exist. Any international stock market will tell you that they do not have any information about "FYROM denar". Macedonian 20:53, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Alexander 007 22:10, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Call my country by its name, as over 110 other countries do. Via Egnatia
- Support. sounds like Greek unilateralism again. 132.205.46.167 00:34, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. It's what the thing is currently called. If someone doesn't like that, this is not the place to fight that battle. --BluePlatypus 01:40, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. No Account 23:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Support. redirect from FYROM, baddi bing, baddi boom Joe I 00:15, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
Discussion
Given that the CIA World Factbook, the [7]
And, besides that, let us not forget the currency's official name - Macedonian denar (МКД)
For those who don't know I like to remind you that Theathenae was the author of the infamous Disclaimer template [8]. Expect the same people who voted for it, to vote Oppose here. --FlavrSavr 16:51, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
The current title appears to be unique to Wikipedia: compare the Google results for "Macedonian denar", which is what every English source calls it, and "FYROM denar", which generates 75 unique hits, none of which actually call it the "FYROM denar" and most of which are just search engine spam. —Charles P. (Mirv) 19:15, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
On Wikipedia, there are often conflicts between 'official' names and 'common' names. In this case, no such conflict is apparent—it's a Macedonian denar, pure and simple. Whether the country itself has a naming dispute is immaterial; the currency markets have made their decision on what to call this currency. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:41, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
I have moved this page to Macedonian denar, as per the near-consensus above. --
]Most common name
- 109,000 for "macedonian denar" -wikipedia. http://www.google.com/search?hs=srV&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=opera&rls=en&q=%22macedonian+denar%22+-wikipedia&btnG=Search
- 901 for "FYROM denar" -wikipedia. http://www.google.com/search?hs=qCB&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=opera&rls=en&q=%22FYROM+denar%22+-wikipedia&btnG=Search
bogdan | Talk 13:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
An image on this page may be deleted
This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:10 denari 2008.png, found on Macedonian denar, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact ST47. STBotI (talk) 01:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Macedonian denar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006135748/http://www.novamakedonija.com.mk/DetalNewsInstant.asp?vestInstant=3400 to http://www.novamakedonija.com.mk/DetalNewsInstant.asp?vestInstant=3400
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Name change: Denar of North Macedonia
Under Prespa Treaty, every organisation or entity that is linked to the State, has to abolish the terms "Macedonia" and "Macedonian" and instead replace it with "of North Macedonia". The Government of North Macedonia has already announced that banknotes will start to be reprinted from next year referring to North Macedonia. The central bank in capital Skopje will begin issuing new banknotes by the start of 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.86.136.118 (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Either that, although I believe "North Macedonian Denar" would be a good alternative. StevenHal (talk) 16:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- I agree – the name is currency is only "denar" and the adjective from the country name is only added commonly. As the country name has been changed the adjective in the name of this article also should be changed. Aotearoa (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- There'll be a comprehensive RfC deciding on new naming guidelines at WP:NCMAC; this decision should be taken in light of it – and of course of the practice of reliable sources. As long as external sources haven't begun changing the name, there's no reason we should. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)]
- I prefer "North Macedonia Denar" as mentioned in UNTERM[9]--218.102.153.56 (talk) 09:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Currency names and their abbreviations are internationally standardized by ISO 4217. I don't know whether the Macedonian government has any plans to have the international name for their currency updated, but as long as ISO isn't changed, "Macedonian denar (MKD)" will remain the universally used name in practice, and as such obviously also the name we will use here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Actually "Macedonian denar" is not the name appeared in ISO 4217. You should see this[10].--218.102.153.56 (talk) 08:38, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Not North Macedonian denar, the adjective North Macedonian is not correct. I recommend that we follow this naming and the Prespa agreement to the word, to avoid endless edit wars , vandalisms etc. -- Stevepeterson (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
REQUEST FOR MOVE: NORTH MACEDONIA DENAR
I propose moving the article to North Macedonia denar in accordance to Prespa Agreement and the following UN guidelines: "Currency Designation: North Macedonia denar" I recommend that we follow this naming and the Prespa agreement to the word, to avoid endless edit wars , vandalisms etc. -- Stevepeterson (talk) 10:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Page title is out-of-date
The title of this page looks out-of-date and North Macedonia has already released coins with the new name of the country. Currency names and their abbreviations are internationally standarized by ISO 4217 as discussed above, and by looking at the up-to-date currency code reported by iso.org in different formats [here], e.g., [XLS] and [XML]. For the currency of North Macedonia, the new official name is denar, and the code remains MKD.
This is not the only case where the name of the country is not part of the official name of the currency. For example, "Kwanza" of Angola, "Lek" of Albania, "Taka" of Bangladesh, and so on. In all these cases, wikipedia uses the adjective derived from the name of the country in front of the currency name for disambiguation, i.e.,
A similar policy is followed by United Nations that report the currency as North Macedonia denar (as pointed out by Stevepeterson).
I don't have a strong preference between North Macedonian denar (consistent with all other currencies in wikipedia) and North Macedonia denar (used by United Nations), as none of them is official, the official is simply denar. I may slightly prefer North Macedonian denar as I don't see any drawback of it. Another proposal may be to change the title to Denar (MKD) but this is inconsistent to all other wikipedia pages too.
Some examples of recent links (after Prespa Agreement) from the National Bank of North Macedonia confirm that "Macedonian denar" is not used at all. The currency is called denar. Please look at: link 1, link 2, link 3, link 4, link 5
I am looking forward for your proposals. Thanks. Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας 17:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support for North Macedonian denar which is used by a large list of reliable sources. Korpalo (talk) 08:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 6 August 2022
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 1 September 2022. The result of the move review was Overturned to no consensus. |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. There is a clear consensus, with evidence presented, that the proposed name is the
]Macedonian denar → North Macedonian denar – The title of this page looks out-of-date and North Macedonia has already released coins with the new name of the country. Currency names and their abbreviations are internationally standarized by ISO 4217 as discussed above, and by looking at the up-to-date currency code reported by iso.org in different formats [here], e.g., [XLS] and [XML]. For the currency of North Macedonia, the new official name is denar, and the code remains MKD.
This is not the only case where the name of the country is not part of the official name of the currency. For example, "Kwanza" of Angola, "Lek" of Albania, "Taka" of Bangladesh, and so on. In all these cases, wikipedia uses the adjective derived from the name of the country in front of the currency name for disambiguation, i.e.,
A similar policy is followed by United Nations that report the currency as North Macedonia denar (as pointed out by Stevepeterson).
I don't have a strong preference between North Macedonian denar (consistent with all other currencies in wikipedia) and North Macedonia denar (used by United Nations), as none of them is official, the official is simply denar. I may slightly prefer North Macedonian denar as I don't see any drawback of it. Another proposal may be to change the title to Denar (MKD) but this is inconsistent to all other wikipedia pages too.
Some examples of recent links (after Prespa Agreement) from the National Bank of North Macedonia confirm that "Macedonian denar" is not used at all. The currency is called denar. Please look at: link 1, link 2, link 3, link 4, link 5 Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας(talk) 14:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. I get far more hits for "Macedonian denar" than "North Macedonian denar" on Google books (47 pages of hits vs. 2 pages). Further, the Macedonian government does not refer to the currency as "North Macedonian denar" because it does not use the adjective "North Macedonian" in any context whatsoever. Thus, per WP:OFFICIALNAME, the current title is appropriate. In addition seemingly every wiki except with the Greek one continue to use "Macedonian denar". The UN link uses "North Macedonia denar" (no "n" at the end of "Macedonia"). --Local hero talk 16:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)]
- You reported 47+2 results but these are not confirmed by the links you provided. I went step-by-step through all the books in the links, and most of them were published before 2019, when the country was Macedonia or FYROM. We should look only on those that were published starting from 2019, and there are only 16 books in Google books. From those 16 books, there are actually 4 main categories
- - 2 books report "Macedonian denar" only once and both in historical context:"The Macedonian denar (MKD) has been pegged to the euro since 1998, ..." and In 2008, the collapse of foreign investments, ... Macedonian denar, ...".
- - 1 book reports "Skopje Republic Macedonian Denar".
- Category 2: Vague usage of Macedonian denar / North Macedonian currency
- - 1 book reports "Macedonian denar" on page 22, as an answer to a question but I cannot confirm that by looking on the same page and book on this preview
- - 1 book reports "Macedonian denar" but it also reports "... you have some cash in North Macedonian currency, because there are places that only accept mkd...".
- Category 2: Vague usage of Macedonian denar / North Macedonian currency
- Support. The list of reliable sources (see below) compiled by all users participating in this request, and using the same methodology with the RfC 2019, shows that the current name is not the most common anymore. The total number of references to "North Macedonian denar" or "North Macedonia denar" is 192=(135+57), which is much higher than the only 84 references to Macedonian denar. The 135 total references to North Macedonian denar indicate that a change is necessary in the title of this page (either to North Macedonian denar or to North Macedonia denar) per WP:COMMONNAME. Between these two names, North Macedonian denar is used by more reliable sources than North Macedonia denar, namely 135 vs 57. North Macedonian denar is used by the vast majority of reliable sources while the National Bank of North Macedonia calls it with its official name "denar". Korpalo (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)]
- I'm not aware of any policy that states common names are determined by excluding sources from more than 3 years ago. Nonetheless, by performing a date range search on Google books from February 2019 to present, I get 4 pages of hits for "Macedonian denar" and just two total hits for "North Macedonian denar".
- The government does not use "North Macedonian denar". See here for the National Bank which identifies "Macedonian money" (Македонски пари) as the denar. You will not find "severnomakedonski denar" (северномакедонски денар) used in any government publication. For instance, this recent article from the National Bank calls it "makedonskiot denar" (македонскиот денар; "the Macedonian denar").
- Foreign entities also call it the "Macedonian denar" such as the World Bank, the UK, the European Banking Federation, Bank of Moldova, Bank of Albania, etc. The current title is the appropriate title. --Local hero talk 05:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing sources for "Macedonian denar". "Macedonian money/currency" is not the same as "Macedonian denar". One of the Google books that I report above use "North Macedonian currency" and is not included in favour of "North Macedonian denar". The National Bank of North Macedonia refers to the currency as "denar" which is the official name (except one case referring as Macedonian denar). I added your links for "Macedonian denar" under my comment above to have all the references collected together. One of the links you provided, European Banking Federation has a contributor based in North Macedonia and is excluded from the list per RfC 2019 methodology. Korpalo (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: List of Reliable Sources (North Macedonian denar: 135 findings, North Macedonia denar: 57 findings, Macedonian denar: 89 findings)
- We use the same methodology with the RfC 2019. We only include links published after February 12, 2019. This is in compliance with the name changes policy which instructs us to give extra weight to reliable sources written after the name change is announced, and we don't include sources based in North Macedonia or Greece or their respective diaspora communities.
- This list includes all the sources reported by all editors participated in this move request when they fulfil four criteria:
- It should be clear that the source has been updated after February 12, 2019. For example, there is an explicit publication date or the name of the country is North Macedonia. One excellent example of what cannot be considered updated source is the VISA reported by the user Local hero. There is no publication date, and the country is reported as "MACEDONIA, THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF".
- Sources that include only references to historical context (before February 12, 2019) are not included in this list. A great example that confirms this distinction that may happen by a published text is the Deutsche Bundesbank reported by the user MOS:MAC makes the same distinction for the name of the country, namely Macedonia when referring to historical context (before February 12, 2019), and North Macedonia when talking about the present. Consequently, any source that uses "Macedonian denar" only in historical context is evidence that "Macedonian denar" was the common name for the currency of the Republic of Macedonia (which is not the question of this Move Request), but it doesn't indicate anything about the name of the currency of North Macedonia (after February 12, 2019). For example, in the wikipedia page of Zoran Zaev, it says "he was a Member of the Parliament of Macedonia". This sentence is not evidence that the name of the country used by wikipedia is Republic of Macedonia. Therefore, the source of Deutsche Bundesbankis not included in the sources list of "Macedonian denar" which is used only in historical references, however, the source is included in the list of "North Macedonia denar".
- A drop-down menu of currencies in online payments is not a reliable source, because the author/editor of a source doesn't choose case by case the name of each currency that shows up in the currency menu. The name of the currency reported in the list is determined by an external software provider. For example, Local hero reported Emptoris sourcing, which shows the default names used by applications/webpages etc. This Emptoris sourcing source is included in the list of findings for "Macedonian denar", and this is a sufficient reliable source to cover all those cases. Nevertheless, the following list doesn't include the currency name shown in an arbitrary number of applications that may rely on the same default currency names provided by the same external company.
- The same source in different languages is not considered a different source. One excellent example is the European Union Commission that publishes the same document that reports "North Macedonian denar" in 24 languages. Therefore, the two sources of the EU are reported once each (not 24 times each, namely 48 times for both documents Official Journal of the EU (28.11.2019) Official Journal of the EU (17.02.2021)).
- A finding is defined as any kind of reliable source, e.g., webpage or document, that includes one term (e.g., North Macedonian denar or Macedonian denar) at least once. Two findings are one or multiple results found in two different sources. Not two results of the same term in the same source. The number of results in each source is not reported.
- North Macedonian denar: 135 findings
- International Monetary Fund (2 finding) book1 book2
- United Nations (1 reference) UNIDO
- European Union (5 findings) EU1 EU2 EUR3 EU4 EU5
- Eurostat (9 findings) EST1 EST2 EST3 EST4 EST5 EST6 EST7 EST8 EST9
- European Banking Authority (2 findings) EBA1 EBA2
- European Training Foundation (1 finding) ETF1
- UNICEF (1 finding) Research report
- USA Government (7 findings) USG1 USG2 USG3 USG4 USG5 USG6 USG7
- UK Government (2 findings) UKG1 UKG2
- Government of Montenegro (1 finding) source
- JuroSystem (1 finding) source
- World Bank (2 findings) WB1 WB2
- Public Debt Management Network (1 finding) PDM
- Central Bank of the Republic of Kosovo (34 findings) BQK1 BQK2 BQK3 BQK4 BQK5 BQK6 BQK7 BQK8 BQK9 BQK10 BQK11 BQK12 BQK13 BQK14 BQK15 BQK16 BQK17 BQK18 BQK19 BQK20 BQK21 BQK22 BQK23 BQK24 BQK25 BQK26 BQK27 BQK28 BQK29 BQK30 BQK31 BQK32 BQK33 BQK34
- Erste Bank, Austria (2 findings) MO1 MO2
- Worlds Economic Database (9 findings) WED1 WED2 WED3 WED4 WED5 WED6 WED7 WED8 WED9
- S&P Global (2 findings) S&P1 S&P2
- NASDAQ documents (2 findings) link1 link2
- BTI Transformation Index (1 finding) BTI 2020 Country Report North Macedonia
- The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (6 findings) WIIW1 WIIW2 WIIW3 WIIW4 WIIW5 WII6
- European Haemophilia Consortium (2 findings) EHC1 EHC2
- Institute for Field Research (1 finding) irfglobal.org
- Wageningen University & Research (1 finding) article
- Tourism Planning & Development (1 finding) article/book
- NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH (1 finding) NBER
- Hungarian Telekom (1 finding) HT
- EVN, Austria (4 findings) EVN1 EVN2 EVN3 EVN4
- Central Asia Metals PLC (3 findings) CAMPLC1 CAMPLC2 CAMPLC3
- Assicurazioni Generali (1 reference) Annual Report
- EastEuroCo (1 finding) Labour Market Review
- Avaron Emerging Europe Fund (2 findings) EVN1 EVN2
- Liberty Adriatic (1 finding) link
- Mogo, Latvia (1 finding) source
- NBER (1 finding) source
- Krka Group (3 findings) KG1 KG2 KG3
- Invest in See (1 finding) link
- TITAN Global (1 finding) link
- Additional (11 findings in) media: Financial Times Currencies results, Company Announcements, Diplomacy & Trade Modest Revenue Increase at Magyar Telekom, Shearman & Sterling LLP source, Focus Economics (Head title on the tab of the page), PhiPost PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5, Nioga NG1
- Google books (3 findings): book1, book2, book3
- North Macedonia denar: 57 findings
- United Nations (1 finding) UN
- U.S. Embassy in North Macedonia (1 finding) USENM
- Embassy of Sweden in North Macedonia (1 finding) ESNM
- Národná banka Slovenska (2 finding) NBS1 NBS2
- WorldBank (3 findings) WB1 WB2 WB3
- Worlds Economic Database (1 finding) WED1
- Microsoft (1 finding) source
- TCXFund (1 finding) source
- Deutsche Bundesbank (46 findings) DB1 DB2 DB3 DB4 DB5 DB6 DB7 DB8 DB9 DB10 DB11 DB12 DB13 DB14 DB15 DB16 DB17 DB18 DB19 DB20 DB21 DB22 DB23 DB24 DB25 DB26 DB27 DB28 DB29 DB30 DB31 DB32 DB33 DB34 DB35 DB36 DB37 DB38 DB39 DB40 DB41 DB42 DB43 DB44 DB45 DB46
- denar of North Macedonia: 1 finding
- European Union Commission (1 finding) EUC
- Macedonian denar: 89 findings
- World Bank (11 findings) WB1 WB2 WB3 WB4 WB5 WB6 WB7 WB8 WB9 WB10 WB11
- International Monetary Fund (20 findings) IMF1 IMF2 IMF3 IMF4 IMF5 IMF6 IMF7 IMF8 IMF9 IMF10 IMF11 IMF12 IMF13 IMF14 IMF15 IMF16 IMF17 IMF18 IMF19 IMF20
- European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (1 finding) EBDRD
- European Training Foundation (3 finding) ETF1 ETF2 ETF3
- Eurostat (1 finding) EST1
- Taxation and Customs Union (3 findings) TCU1 TCU2 TCU3
- OECD Library (1 finding) OECD
- US Government (3 findings) USG1 USG2 USG3
- US Embassy in North Macedonia (6 findings) USENM1 USENM2 USENM3 USENM4 USENM5 USENM6
- Canadian Government (1 finding) Canada.gov
- UK Government (3 findings) UKG1 UKG2 UKG3
- Deutsche Bank (1 finding) DB1
- Bank of Moldova (1 finding) Official exchange rates
- Bank of Albania (1 finding) Official exchange rate
- Bank of Slovenia (1 finding) foreign exchange rates
- Bank of Lithuania (1 finding) Foreign exchange rates
- BTI Transformation Index (1 finding) Report
- IBM (1 finding) Emptoris sourcing
- NASDAQ (3 findings) NASDAQ1 NASDAQ2 NASDAQ3
- S&P Global (7 findings) S&P1 S&P2 S&P3 S&P4 S&P5 S&P6 S&P7
- Global Economy (1 finding) Money supply
- Coinbase (1 finding) currency converter
- Belt and road (1 finding) source
- Additional (3 findings in) media: IPN, World Atlas, rekvizitai
- Google Books (13 findings, 5 of them are written by the same author): book1, book2,book3, book4, book5, book6 book7 book8 book9 book10 book11 book12 book13
- Macedonia denar: 2 findings
- denar: 3 findings
- mixed North Macedonian denar and Macedonian denar: 2 findings
- Central Asia Metals PLC (1 findings) londonstockexchange
- Lute Credit (2 findings) LC1 LC2
- Summary: North Macedonian denar: 135 findings, North Macedonia denar: 57 findings, denar of North Macedonia: 1 finding, Macedonian denar: 89 findings, Macedonia denar: 2 findings, denar: 3 findings Korpalo (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
detailed discussion for the list of reliable sources
|
---|
|
- Support . As per the Methodology section of RfC and Korpalo provided links . Weatherextremes (talk) 16:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a vote, so please provide rationale rather than an empty statement supporting the move because "Korpalo provided links"... I also provided links. --Local hero talk 16:18, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- I did. I think those links have more merit than yours. Weatherextremes (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a vote, so please provide rationale rather than an empty statement supporting the move because "Korpalo provided links"... I also provided links. --Local hero talk 16:18, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I view that Local hero's links have more merit. The article could be modified to state that 'North Macedonian denar' is also used in some cases. Quite frankly. in the RfC the term "Macedonian denar" is more frequently used. Or the name could change to 'Denar (MKD)' or simply 'Denar' despite it being against the precedent, since it's after all both the official and most commonly used name. Kluche (talk) 17:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
outdated "Macedonian denar" list; please see User:Local hero/sandbox for up-to-date "Macedonian denar" list
|
---|
This seems to be turning into a who-has-more-time-to-scour-the-web discussion. So, here we go for "Macedonian denar", all post-Prespa agreement:
Can we now agree that there has been *no definitive switch* to "North Macedonian denar", but still adjust the lead sentence to provide "North Macedonian denar" as an alternative name? --Local hero talk 04:52, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
detailed discussion for the list of reliable sources
|
---|
North Macedonia Travel Guide 2020 will help you plan your trip to this beautiful country in the Balkans. The guide book contains up to the date information about local cuisine, transportation, interesting places to visit, accomodation options, security and the history of North Macedonia. Written by a native who has tons of useful knowledge, North Macedonia Travel Guide 2020 is a handy and useful passport to the best in North Macedonia!
|
- Support for North Macedonian denar is obvious since I created the Move Request. It's important though to explain the reasons for my support. There is significant and indisputable evidence that North Macedonian denar has become a WP:COMMONNAME confirmed by the list of reliable sources created by two equally motivated users (thanks both of you), the one of which supports and the other opposes this move request, and by using the same methodology used in RfC. Whether North Macedonian denar is more common than Macedonian denar may still be debated. As a mathematician, in the end of the day we cannot prove which of the two is the most common one. We will have only indications. For this reason, I will not stick to the numbers of the reliable sources, I look at the trend of them. Within only the short period of three years after the name change, the new name North Macedonian denar is already used equally (or more often) than Macedonian denar. Aditional reliable sources use North Macedonia denar or denar of North Macedonia. All these facts show that the qualifier used for denar is in line with the new name of the country (North is included), and in most of these cases they use the adjectival reference North Macedonian. This is in line with the policy followed in wikipedia for the currency names of other countries. I don't see any reason to avoid North Macedonian denar given that the term is already well-established based on reliable sources. North Macedonian denar satisfies more requirements than Macedonian denar:
- none of them satisfies the WP:OFFICIALNAME, since the official name is denar
- both of them satisfy the WP:COMMONNAME, and we cannot prove what is the most common name (currently 100 results for North Macedonian denar and 65 results for Macedonian denar)
- WP:MOSMACindicates that Macedonian denar should be preferred
- North Macedonian denar is in line with the country's new name used in wikipedia, Macedonian denar is not
- North Macedonian denar is in line with the policy followed for the currency names of other countries in wikipedia, Macedonian denar is not
- none of them satisfies the
- Overall, North Macedonian denar has no drawback compared to Macedonian denar, and Macedonian denar has no advantage over North Macedonian denar. Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας(talk) 07:48, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support. I base my support on the main findings of the present discussion for the requested move:
- The most important argument for updating the title of this article is uniformity at the level of countries for titles of articles about currencies. For countries other than that at hand, the adjectival reference that precedes the name of their currency directly corresponds to the full name of the country. For instance, the name “South Sudanese pound” is used to refer to the currency of South Sudan. Since the name of the country at hand has recently changed, the title of the article of its currency should also change to reflect the former change.
- Moreover, based on the list of reliable sources that has been jointly compiled both by contributors for and against the requested move, terms including the adjective “North” are already significantly more common than those without, and this despite the ever present inertia in the usage of past terms (as the one used in the present title) over newly introduced terms (as the one proposed in the requested move) when the context is unofficial. Wikipedia should therefore reflect this change now and not take sides by persisting on the current title.
- Due to the lengthy character of the present discussion, I would also like to draw again the attention of readers to the fact that an objective list of sources, containing reviewed sources from both sides and adhering to the relevant Wikipedia policies, is only included in the comment above titled “Comment: List of Reliable Sources”. The above facts are not true for the other lists cited above. Pratishthana (talk) 16:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- CONSENSUS COMMENT. 6 out of 6 users unanimously agree that North Macedonian denar must be included as a common name for the currency. 2 users have expressed concerns about North Macedonian denar being the title of the page but their reasoning is not supported by facts/arguments or/and wikipedia policies. The reasoning of Kluche is "Or the name could change to 'Denar (MKD)' or simply 'Denar' despite it being against the precedent, since it's after all both the official and most commonly used name". Local hero claims "per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:OFFICIALNAME, the current title is appropriate". However, none of the claims made by these two users is supported by the reality or/and the reliable sources. The official name is denar. The most common name is North Macedonian denar based on the reliable sources prepared by Korpalo (who supports) and Local hero (who opposes).
Options | Official Name | Most Common Name | Unambiguous | Recommended by WP:MOSMAC |
In line with the new country's name | Consistent with the page titles for currencies of other countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Macedonian denar | NO | used in 47% of the reliable source | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Macedonian denar | NO | used in 31% of the reliable sources | maybe | NO | NO | NO |
denar | YES | NO | NO | Neutral | Neutral | NO |
Winner | denar | North Macedonian denar | North Macedonian denar | North Macedonian denar | North Macedonian denar | North Macedonian denar |
The table shows that North Macedonian denar satisfies all criteria and wins the other two options in all categories. The only exception is the official name, in which denar wins.
The current Macedonian denar does not win in any category.
Given that there is no advantage of the current Macedonian denar versus the proposed North Macedonian denar, if some user still opposes to North Macedonian denar, would s/he like to tell us what are the arguments to support the current title that is not the most common name, may be ambiguous, is not recommended by
- There is an argument to be made if "North Macedonian denar" is recommended by WP:MOSMAC - Article names, categories, and templates should avoid adjectival use altogether. The use of neutral formulations such as "of North Macedonia", "in North Macedonia," etc. is preferred and According to the official prescriptions of the Prespa agreement, the adjectival form "North Macedonian" is generally to be avoided. Instead, it suggests the plain "Macedonian" is to be used in some contexts; while in other contexts, both adjectives are to be avoided altogether in favor of the alternative of possessive constructions like "of North Macedonia". Kluche (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- You focus on two sentences of WP:MOSMACthat are misleading:
- Article names, categories, and templates was not a separate question in RfC 2019. The only meaningful reason for the existence of this sentence is to recommend that neutral formulations should be preferred due to lack of reliable sources. For instance, if we cannot find reliable sources about XYZ, we should use a neutral formulation instead of Macedonian XYZ or North Macedonian XYZ. For XYZ=denar we have a significantly large number of reliable sources that confirm North Macedonian denar is the most common name.
- There is no case that the WP:MOSMACincludes a subjective interpretation of the Prespa Agreement. Otherwise, we would like to know in which line of which page of the Prespa Agreement you found this sentence.
- On the other hand, I hope you don't intentionally ignore the whole text of WP:MOSMACbetween the two sentences you reported that recommends North Macedonian. For your convenience, the two sentences are:
- However, in line with the reliable sources, adjectives may still be used when referring to such institutions in generic terms (e.g. the Greek and North Macedonian prime ministers), especially where the possessive form would be grammatically cumbersome or unnatural. While reliable sources continue to use both plain "Macedonian" and "North Macedonian" in such contexts, the majority opinion in the RfC favored the fuller form, "North Macedonian".
- In all other contexts, both "North Macedonian" and "Macedonian" may be used on Wikipedia in reference to the country (e.g. a North Macedonian company, or the Macedonian economy). In the absence of a clearer consensus on which of the two to prefer, it is recommended to use the longer form where ambiguity might be an issue (especially on first introducing the topic).
- You focus on two sentences of
- Given that you agree to rename this page, and after this clarification about WP:NAMECHANGES in contrast to the current title that fulfils none and is out-of-date. Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας(talk) 17:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)]
- Given that you agree to rename this page, and after this clarification about
- Relisting comment: I am relisting this discussion in the hope of getting some input from experienced editors from outside this topic area, particularly regarding the common name and the application of walls of text. Thanks. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)]
- Thanks, I'm returning to this discussion after a few days and I see yet another single-purpose account has popped up on the support side. I'm going to keep working on my list, perhaps at a sandbox, as the above is becoming difficult to sift through. --Local hero talk 03:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment: The "Macedonian denar" references list now resides at User:Local hero/sandbox. There are well over 200 listed, more than half of which are from international organizations, nearly three dozen are from foreign governments, another nearly three dozen from businesses/business news/business entities, just over a dozen books and journals, almost two dozen miscellaneous news articles and company websites. This is not counting others I've compiled that others may find to be "borderline".
Now, I'll finally turn to the "North Macedonian" list. The following should be excluded:
- One of the two IMF sources is from 2018 and must be excluded, as has been requested of my "Macedonian" sources.
- The UNICEF source is written only by Macedonians and must be excluded
- The second UK gov source is duplicated information from the first (same "part 9" for the DKK)
- What is "db.nomics"? It may call itself the "World's Economic Database" but that is certainly not its name; it is not an international organization. These should all be removed, otherwise I can find a several more comparable sites to "db.nomics" that use "Macedonian denar".
- Same as above for "PhiPost"
- The "Tourism Planning & Development" source must be excluded as it is clearly referring to data as recent as 2014
- There are two links for EVN's 2018/19 reports (one is "Full" and one is "Annual" but the denar page is the exact same and from the same period)
- Liberty Adriatic is some minor Balkan tourist company, not suitable for this discussion; otherwise, I can find many more that use "Macedonian denar" like this company
- Your #35 NBER source is duplicated to the NBER source #25
- One FT source is reproducing the same Central Asia Metals 2018 report
Other notes:
- By far the largest group of findings is from the Kosovo Central Bank, the central bank of a partially-recognized non-UN member.
- I find it interesting that you took issue when some of my sources were covering pre-2019 data in addition to post-2019 data, yet it's not an issue when yours do. Of course, these should not be excluded.
- Three of the US gov sources are actually public filings by one company; still valid just improperly labelled.
- The USAID source has a Macedonian author among other non-Macedonian authors, same with the IFR source (fine by me).
- The Juro source is a currency drop-down list, something you took major issue with in my list.
- One PCC group audit report and one Central Asia Metals report are for 2018, but published in 2019.
Conclusion:
Thus, I conservatively get 207 for "Macedonian denar" and 113 for "North Macedonian denar" (nearly one-third from Kosovo Central Bank) at this point. I essentially rest my case here. "Macedonian denar" remains by far preferred by international organizations, by foreign governments (particularly from English-speaking countries), currency exchange websites, business news sites, online remittance providers, cryptocurrency exchanges, business data sites, Google books results (in quantity and quality), foreign companies, etc. Truly the only edge "North Macedonian denar" seems to have is at the Kosovo Central Bank. We can also see that Google trends indicate "Macedonian denar" is much more popular. I believe it is clear that "North Macedonian denar" has not overtaken "Macedonian denar" as the common name and we can all stop scouring the web now. --Local hero talk 21:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- From day 1 you say Macedonian denar is the apropriate title, and since then you report a long list of spam by looking at out-of-date pages that still call the country FYROM and use the old Macedonian denar. Your list for sources of Macedonian denar includes: Deutsche Bundesbank “legal currency: Macedonian denar”; 22 July 2022 [also uses "North Macedonia denar" (no -n)], although the document clarifies that the term Macedonian denar was used only until February 11, 2019. In the beginning I thought you really didn't understand but after weeks playing the same game now I am sure you have different goals. This is one of the many examples that you include to make your spamlist longer, and you keep saying that Macedonian denar is the most common name although you cannot show that with scientific data. North is included in about 200 reliable sources (those of North Macedonian denar or North Macedonia denar) and Macedonian denar can be found in about 100 links of your list. 200 is 2 times more than 100. Even if you find 200 VALID links of Macedonian denar, wou will only show that Macedonian denar is used as often as the new name of the country. You are too far away from that.
- I will remind you what you wrote recently here: I do not use "North Macedonian", as MOSMAC generally prefers "Macedonian" or other formulations. In cases of ambiguity, I use neutral formulations. Your answer makes clear that you would fight against the implementation of WP:MOSMAC. It's sad that after three years, this community cannot implement its own decisions because of some editors like you who make arbitrary decisions. Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας(talk) 08:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)]
- Strong oppose. There is nothing to be gained by forgoing ]
- Support - easy. Consistency reigns here; common name, natural, concise etc. all concur. was your comment for the move request to "North Macedonian passport" last year. How would you explain this contradiction after a year? FYI the country has changed its name from Macedonia to North Macedonia, affecting the common name for passports, denars, etc. Korpalo (talk) 20:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Denar
The name of the currency is denar, and "Macedonian" doesn't come before it officially, and no other currency today is called denar. I believe that
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)