Search results
Appearance
The page "Talk:NATO/js/include/images/russia.png" does not exist. You can click on "Talk:NATO/js/include/images/russia.png" to create the page directly, or you may create a draft and submit it for review, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Talk:International recognition of Kosovo/Archive 18 (section 'The entry about Tibet has nothing to do with Tibet's reaction; its all about Russia' & Other Problems)OIC membership of a country noted alongside EU, NATO, and UN Security Council membership? Yes, EU, NATO, and UN membership info is important, but as far...107 KB (14,799 words) - 23:37, 29 January 2023
- Talk:European Union/Archive 13 (section Use of images)are NATO countries which means that any NATO deployment is likely to be comprised of a mostly EU force. JRWalko 01:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC) I think NATO forces...149 KB (23,284 words) - 10:33, 21 March 2023
- UN/EU/NATO - nor does it make one of these organizations look like arbiter over who is a state or something like this. Percentage of UN/EU/NATO members...202 KB (27,190 words) - 01:17, 20 February 2023
- Talk:United States Armed Forces/Archive 4 (section Russian Space Forces pre-date the U.S. Space Force)like Britain, Germany and Russia, also terrorists and by whom? Is the U.S. Armed Forces recognized as terrorists by NATO and other countries that adhere...100 KB (14,490 words) - 00:13, 27 December 2022
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology under supervision of Hayward Alker. NATO's interest in the entire question has an obvious background - long cycle theory...53 KB (6,999 words) - 05:42, 9 January 2024
- any person, or groups point of view(be it American, Russian, the EU's, the UK's, the UN's, NATO's, OPEC's, the World's, etc.). --ᎠᏢ462090 10:17, 10 August...123 KB (17,568 words) - 21:06, 7 June 2022
- or the Russian Federation, so quoting those pages is just about as useful (and by that I mean not useful at all) as quoting us the UN, WTO, NATO etc pages...316 KB (53,026 words) - 11:07, 25 June 2022
- com/anasayfa_erdogan-obama-to-meet-at-nato-summit-amid-strained-ties_357610.html to https://www.todayszaman.com/anasayfa_erdogan-obama-to-meet-at-nato-summit-amid-strained-ties_357610...50 KB (7,194 words) - 14:28, 15 April 2023
- in their respective spreadsheets. Some images to illustrate: http://i.imgur.com/pQUH5sS.png -- in this image all four spreadsheets are sorted in descending...301 KB (39,440 words) - 10:34, 14 May 2024
- sig=AHIEtbRJBbG4bDu2FZ6lJsXTT8QRqKLRAA http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:znXbtjrti_sJ:www.genocidescholars.org/images/OpenLetterTurkishPMreArmenia6-13-05...136 KB (19,604 words) - 02:23, 30 January 2023
- Talk:Main Page/Archive 148 (section TFA image)(UTC) The image is public domain in the U.S. The U.S. copyright was not restored by the Uruguay Round Agreement Act (URAA) because Russia only had a...202 KB (28,052 words) - 02:15, 3 March 2023
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic? A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: B. Images are provided where...203 KB (29,790 words) - 21:32, 29 January 2023
- Talk:United States/Archive 29 (section Image caption)positive edits to the anti-communist section. Note that we discuss the role of NATO and select member states elsewhere in the article, as well. MrZaiustalk 17:40...269 KB (40,198 words) - 07:41, 30 May 2022
- because the US is a key partner in NATO. The "war" in Libya is being waged by the rebels with (occasionally) some NATO assistance. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:17...296 KB (33,381 words) - 10:19, 8 March 2023
- Talk:United States diplomatic cables leak/Archive 1 (section Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi did not support Kosovo independence because of ties to russia)Serbia without the Hague condition, and the Partnership for Peace program of NATO, it was written in a message from the U.S. Embassy in Paris, which was published...152 KB (20,888 words) - 20:50, 3 February 2023
- unless the subject is almost exclusively known by its abbreviation (e.g. NATO and Laser)." Second, Y2K is ambiguous, referring to the year, the bugs, the...99 KB (14,725 words) - 13:32, 24 November 2021
- first, it was only US and British forces who invaded, not NATO. At the moment, the ISAF and NATO are working under the peacekeeping mission in agreement