Talk:Opyl

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia Low‑importance Opyl is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

• What I think should be changed (include citations):

Thanks for your help. ShareRoot rebranded as Opyl in 2020 and as such this article is substantially out of date as "ShareRoot" no longer exists as an entity and the current company is Opyl. Opyl is listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) as OPL. Additionally, the business model of the company differs substantially from the content currently in the article. I propose that the page's slug be changed from ShareRoot to Opyl Ltd (with ShareRoot automatically forwarding to the Opyl Ltd article slug) and the existing content on the page moved to a "As ShareRoot" section with the exception of the first sentence which (when updated) can form the introduction of the article, like so:

Opyl Ltd (ASX: OPL) is a Melbourne, Victoria-based company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange that provides a software as a service (SaaS) platform leveraging artificial intelligence to understand and improve healthcare design, development, and delivery.

As ShareRoot

Founded in 2013 in California by Noah Abelson-Gertler and Marc Angelone as ShareRoot, ShareRoot's initial digital mar tech platforms provided the ability to search for and source User-Generated Content (UGC) from Instagram and Twitter by requesting and obtaining a license and release from the content's owner. ShareRoot acquired The Social Science, an Australian STEMM specialist digital marketing agency in April 2018. Co-founded by Michelle Gallaher, Michelle joined the ShareRoot team after the acquisition. In March 2019, Michelle became CEO of ShareRoot recalibrating the strategy to focus predominantly in building digital and AI-enabled tools for the global healthcare sector. Before going public in 2016, ShareRoot had previously participated in 500 Startups batch 8 and raised a round of angel investing.

ShareRoot was rebranded to Opyl Ltd (ASX: OPL) in 2020 to work on technology to support the health and life sciences sector.

Citations can be found on the Opyl Ltd and ASX website including notices of the rebrand.

https://opyl.ai/reports-category/announcements/

Additionally, the information in the sidebar slug needs to be updated (the Opyl logo can be found on the website at http://opyl.ai ) with Noah Abelson-Gertler and Marc Angelone moved into the proposed "As ShareRoot" section and the industry changed to (Artificial intelligence and social media services) and the headquarters changed to Melbourne, Victoria, Australia as the original founders are no longer affiliated with the company and have moved on.

• Why it should be changed:

As mentioned above, the current article contains significantly out of date information about an entity that no longer exists and has been rebranded as a new organisation — rather than losing information about Opyl's history, I propose simply moving most of the existing article into its own section and updating the rest to reflect current details about the company as it exists today.

Unfortunately, the inaccurate information continues to be pulled by sources such as Google and this has been flagged in an information audit about the company. Assistance in getting this updated and corrected is highly appreciated.

119.17.140.12 (talk) 05:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC) Michelle Gallaher, CEO, Opyl LTD[reply]

We need non-primary sources. The company site, announcements and press release cannot be used.However, if you can provide sources from 3rd party news articles, please post. Boredathome101 (talk) 02:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With no reply for the past several months I have marked this request as declined. Following a reply with the requested third party sources, please remove the "|D" in the {{request edit}} to reopen this request. Spencer^T•C 22:48, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do these links suffice?

https://www.startupdaily.net/2019/12/asx-listed-health-data-analytics-startup-shareroot-rebrands-as-opyl/

https://www.proactiveinvestors.com.au/companies/news/908684/opyl-is-new-name-of-digital-health-track-company-shareroot-908684.html

https://opyl.ai/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/radical-rebirth-for-opyl-832e4211f90ad05c80dd04ba521a5a2b.pdf

- Michelle Gallaher, CEO, Opyl LTD

I am not sure about the first 2 ones, but the last is a primary (made by the company itself), and, as such, unreliable source. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources aren't always unreliable, we just have to be careful about using them for potentially biased information. For something as straightforward and neutral as "the company changed its name", they're fine. ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 10:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone appears to have done this at some point, at least in spirit. I'm closing it as  Done . ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 10:07, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]