Search results
Appearance
The page "Talk:Religious views on masturbation/js/language-change.js" does not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for review, or you may create the page "Talk:Religious views on masturbation/js/language-change.js" directly, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- comments comparing breastfeeding to masturbation, as follows: Compared breastfeeding to masturbation In September 2007 on his show HBO Real Time, he introduced...76 KB (11,252 words) - 02:20, 2 March 2023
- relevant to the question of his racial views about the Chinese. I also wanted to add more about his views on India. The article says he thought Britain...130 KB (20,669 words) - 10:08, 22 April 2022
- 17 October 2006 (UTC) Masturbation can occur *in addition to* frot. However, frot has absolutely nothing to do with masturbation. "Docking", which is a...72 KB (11,720 words) - 14:49, 16 September 2021
- beneficial." Cite needed. Masturbation "Circumcision was introduced in the English-speaking world as a measure to prevent masturbation" Nonsense. Circumcision...101 KB (15,996 words) - 06:26, 31 January 2023
- the skeptical view, where the views of those that believe in the existence of SRA are either minimized, diluted or deleted and the views of those skeptical...251 KB (38,962 words) - 09:23, 7 January 2022
- of his strong religious beliefs felt that masturbation was a sin. He believed that circumcision would reduce the incidence of masturbation in boys. So while...273 KB (37,680 words) - 21:22, 29 January 2023
- part. "large audiences" is fairly subjective. How about we change "large" to "his"? ---J.S (t|c) 17:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC) Why even have the phrase at...148 KB (24,762 words) - 21:29, 1 September 2019
- focuses on gay men and MSM, there are not a lot of quality tertiary and secondary sources on the practice and views of anal sex, unless it's the religious views...87 KB (11,339 words) - 06:37, 2 October 2023
- Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints/Archive 11 (section Latest changes on Ordanances)prohibits masturbation (which I understand most Protestant (not Catholic) theologians consider healthy), and that it has equivocal teachings on contraceptives...205 KB (32,138 words) - 16:36, 21 March 2023
- should masturbation be mentioned in the lead? See WP:Lead. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC) If I were to propose a change to the WP:Lead...100 KB (13,402 words) - 02:08, 27 March 2023
- range of size, shape and techniques is completely available as in a masturbation scenario. But yes, length, girth and turgency all play a role. Maybe...102 KB (16,688 words) - 23:23, 19 February 2023
- Talk:Circumcision/Archive 74 (section RfC: Should non-positive views on the sexual effects of circumcision be included?)sexual acts, such as penetrative intercourse and masturbation’."[3]. The fact is that there is debate on this topic and you are suppressing it by having...308 KB (31,915 words) - 06:25, 31 January 2023
- different than respecting others feelings. Should we delete the article on Masturbation or anal sex because the subject matter is often considered offensive...82 KB (11,510 words) - 21:02, 1 March 2023
- it. The article already mentions masturbation, you would like to omit the relevant and cited fact that masturbation is harmless and NOT prevented by circumcision...88 KB (13,096 words) - 18:38, 29 January 2023
- 2007 (UTC) All this seems pretty odd, based on reading Leviathan, where Hobbes very clearly has religious views, even if they were unorthodox. He can't possibly...188 KB (27,866 words) - 16:46, 3 February 2023
- 24.141.218.124 has dumped extremely POV diatribes on the Wikipedia articles for several religious figures. Auric, you made a good attempt to drag it...81 KB (12,280 words) - 01:18, 11 May 2024
- early getting addicted to masturbation. Historically speaking, it is the equivalent of an urban legend, and its presence on this page tends to discredit...140 KB (22,399 words) - 15:54, 30 January 2023
- to shed additional light on the issue. It has rather shed additional confusion. The debate we are having can be seen in the JS Mill-methane example in...68 KB (11,319 words) - 00:00, 7 July 2017
- Talk:Vitalism/Archive 1 (section Clarity on Mesmer)doesn't change anything here Dematt. The fact remains, according to majority view, vitalism is largely dismissed as a discredited quasi-religious notion...205 KB (31,984 words) - 12:24, 2 March 2023
- significant-minority views are welcome in Wikipedia, the views of tiny minorities need not be reported. (See Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View.) Make readers...362 KB (55,652 words) - 13:38, 2 December 2017