Talk:Riverbed Technology

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 June 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

I work for Riverbed Technology. We'd like to update this page to include the new product names. We definitely want to be good stewards of Wikipedia and uphold the editorial guidelines. Before we begin, is there anything specifically that we can address to improve the neutral tone? We intend to write in more plain English and use less industry jargon. If there are any specific recommendations, we will adhere to them.

Thank you for your consideration.Maliaga2014 (talk) 14:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I work for Riverbed Technology, and I've done my best to re-write this page using facts and neutral language. I would appreciate any specific recommendations for improvements. Thank you! Skrichbrinton (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I work for Riverbed Technology, I updated the CTO name to Hansang Bae as listed at https://www.riverbed.com/about/leadership.html I know writing about one's own employer is frowned upon but this is just updating a name with a reference so I hope a notice in the talk page is sufficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngufra (talk • contribs) 18:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Riverbed recapitalized in Dec 2021 and its majority shareholder is Apollo. It is listed as such in the info box and in history paragraph but intro paragraph still states acquired by Thoma Bravo which is outdated.
• References supporting change: https://www.riverbed.com/press-releases/riverbed-initiates-next-steps-implement-recapitalization-and-strengthen-financial

https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/18/riverbed_technologies_chapter11/ https://www.riverbed.com/press-releases/riverbed-aternity-successfully-completes-recapitalization-strengthening-financial-position-to-fuel-next-phase-of-growth-and-innovation Ngufra (talk) 17:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ngufra  Done Cheers. Duke Gilmore (talk) 20:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear what exactly the company does. The information contained in the lede is highly generic and insufficient. Besides all the business blah-blah of the article body, there should be a section about what products and services are in fact offerd. What are Alluvio and Aternity good for? ♆ CUSH ♆ 12:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]