Talk:SITE Intelligence Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconTerrorism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

SITE Institute vs SITE Intelligence Group

These are two different entities, involving Katz. The name recently came up in the news again when they discovered the Sotloff beheading video. I wanted to make sure that there was a clear differentiation between the two. This page was originally redirected to SITE Institute.MeropeRiddle (talk) 00:31, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do any sources differentiate them? See Talk:SITE Institute#To be confused with. —Michael Z. 16:42, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


On the disambiguation page, SITE is called a non-profit organization, while it is called a for-profit organization in the article itself. Can somebody please clarify this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.134.88.50 (talk) 03:04, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Web hosting

SITE arranged the hosting of the GIMF propaganda pages. [1] So with one hand, they're hosting a propaganda page, and with other hand, they're selling information about these pages. Great business model! --THausherr (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And with the other six hands, it does the really good business. Basically driving the terror news market this year, after only steering for a while. Somehow, the exposure hasn't made the center of this web less shady. Maybe by 2020, we'll have enough for a thorough article here. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
2023, and still more questions than answers... by design, im sure... 2601:5CF:8000:6B60:1C9D:1E06:2504:2695 (talk) 17:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]