Talk:WWE Championship/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

~ Exist 2 Inspire ~ Ingus Jynx ~ The WWE championship really has no contenders and probably won't see any till just before Survivor Series. I don't Kno if I'm the only one that thinks this but could Jeff Hardy be in the next feud 4 the WWE championship. I'm wondering if anyone else has the same view? i could see why you might think and i'll agree with you on that but first i he'd deal with edge. That is if jeff has any personal dislike from what he put his brother through.

I've been checking the title history for the WWE title and noticed you guys never posted "The Nature Boy" as a championship holder, even when he is a legend for most title reigns, and followed closely by triple H, I know the methods for winning his titles are not the best liked by the fans but hey, as Tazz used to say: "If you're not cheating, you're not trying" please update the list also due to John Cena's last tittle defense has been in past weeks against Kenny, regards to all of us fans of a great sport. Fierce Lonewolf May 2006

The reason for this is that Ric Flair only won the WWF/E title twice. The reason he is a 16 time champ is beacuse he won the NWA championship several times. Rhys Thomas, August 2006.

Guys it explains it all here TonyO13 20:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC) TonyO13

Note: Technically speaking, overall, Ric Flair has a total of 20 World Championship reigns as a singles wrestler split between, the now defunct, World Championship Wrestling, World Wrestling Entertainment, and the National Wrestling Alliance. WWE recognizes Flair as a 16-time World Champion for storyline purposes (8 NWA, 6 WCW, and 2 WWF). However, Ric Flair is recognized as a 10 time NWA World Heavyweight Champion by the National Wrestling Alliance and was recognized as a 8 time WCW World Heavyweight Champion. WWE considers his 8th NWA reign and 1st WCW reign to be a single reign so as his 2nd and 3rd WCW reigns. WWE also doesn't recognize Flair's 3rd and 9th NWA reigns. World Wrestling Entertainment, despite their storylines, have no control over the lineage of the NWA World Heavyweight Championship since it is not property under their ownership. When World Championship Wrestling was purchased by World Wrestling Entertainment in 2001, all WCW championships and their lineages came under the control of WWE. As a result of WWE's storylines of Flair being a 16-time World Champion, his two reigns with the WCW International World Heavyweight Championship are not recognized by WWE

I personally know that Andre the Giant was indeed 7 feet 4 inches tall. I met him 25 years ago in Madison Square Garden in NYC. I stand 6 feet 4 inches tall, and I do not see a 6 inch difference between us; just twice as much. [User: Barry Burns]

McPhail

17:44, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't understand this sentence: "The tallest champion is The Big Show, billed as 7'4. He is also the heaviest, billed as being 500 lbs. Big Show is in fact 7'2 and approximately 450 lbs". Now how tall and heavy is he? 7'4/500 or 7'2/450? -- Patrice Neff 17:00, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Big Show is 7'2, 490 lbs. He is the tallest WWE champion ever but not the heaviest, that title belongs to

, who was almost 600 lbs. when he won his championship.

Wrestlers are typically billed as being a little heavier/taller than their actual weight/height. Hence the difference in the numbers.

Andre the Giant was taller than The Big Show. Andre was billed at 7'4, and the Big Show was billed at 7'2. Can someone please correct this obvious error.

andre billed at 7'4 530lbs and bigshow billed at 7'2 500lbs. sumtyms wrestlers add 2 inches to their heights and 10 pounds to their weight. same thing goes to actors around the world. ppl were told brad pitt was 6'2 but hes really 5'10. and corben bleu at 5'11 is really 5'6. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 222.154.47.7 (talk)

Andre the Giant was actually the tallest wrestler ever as measured at 7'2 and around 450lbs to 530lbs. Big Show is standing at a peak of 7'1 and 478lbs.

Paul "Big Show" Wight is taller than Andre - while Andre was billed at various heights during his career (anywhere from 7'2" to 7'5"), he was actually only 6'10". - Chadbryant 21:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

I seem to recall a guy known as El Egante that was mentioned as being 7'6"+. I can't seem to find any decent references to him though. I've just discovered he's also known as Giant Gonzalez: [2] & didn't last too long... Surely, El Egante's the tallest? --Barthax 18:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Gonzales is probably the tallest person ever to have worked for WWE. There was also a member of the

McPhail

19:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Jorge Gonzales was listed, I do believe, as being the tallest pro wrestler at 7'6". I believe that, currently, the tallest wrestler working to day is Dalip Singh, better known as the Great Khali. Odin's Beard 18:19, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

gonzales is the tallest wrestler ever. andre had gigatsm so ofcorse pplw uld exagerate his height becoz it wuld change alot. 6'10 at 15 and then 7'0 at 19 then 7'2 at 25

Andre the Giant had a desiese in which he grew for his entire life, so yes as the beginning of his carear he was signifacantally shorter than at the end, this is why the Big Show is known as the tallest athelete ever because that is his hight without and desiese.

Look at Andre's and TBSs page for answers.{Halbared 21:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC))

NO, big show HAD the same DISEASE as Andre!!! --T00C00L 13:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

TBS did have surgery tho that fixed his pituary gland problem at an early age, and so his body did stop growing.(Halbared 14:39, 21 August 2006 (UTC))

yea bigshow did hav the disease. u can tell if sumone has it. they're bigger than normal and fatter(no offense) khali doesnt hav it

Hi to all concerned, I am a user from the GameFAQS Pro Wrestling Board. Robbienewt was a user on this board from 2004-2005. He was often the target of many jokes and was forced to leave the board due to him being almost universally hated - most of the board, myself included, found him to be a hugely irrtating jumped up little chav. It's no surprise to me that the bitter little ponce has decided to come and vandalise Wikipedia.

Oh, please, tell us why. --Vyran 05:31, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

I believe "forced to leave" equates to being banned. Anyway, 195.93.21.33, please do not resort to personal attacks. --Chrysaor 21:17, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

I edited out "Also it may mean he will not hold the title long" under the Current Champion heading because that's more speculation or rumor (and playing along, if we're going to be posting rumors, let's post rumors that are somewhat credible) than fact.

I added in that the WWE championship is also known as the WWE championship of the World, because WWE often refer to it as one it's two "World's" championships on it's website and on television. Vince McMahon just recently on "Wwe Monday night Raw" stated "I'm not gonna have two World Heavyweight champions beat the....." when referring to Angle's challenge to Edge to unify both World's championship right there and then. I put it as "WWE championship of the World" as to not cause confusion with the SmackDown! Brands World Heavyweight championship.

Thanks.

• note - RAWS Belt is referred to as the 'WWE Heavyweight Championship' and Smackdowns as the 'World Heavyweight Championship'. this is logical as the WWE HW title started on smackdown, and the World belt on RAW; and fits in with the policy of RAWs belts being prefixed with 'World' and smackdowns with 'WWE'

Now that it's switched, why are the Tag Titles not switched, at least by name?? I know no one is going to have an answer for this, but doesn't it just make sense, since the Raw Tag belts are the older of the two with the lineage of the original WWE Tag Titles?? When the Dudley’s unified the WWE and WCW Tag Titles, they basically abandoned the WCW Tag Titles. Logically, shouldn’t the Smackdown Tag Titles take the “World” name and carry the linage of WCW’s Tag Titles. That’s how the US and Cruiserweight Titles are.--Prince Patrick 00:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Has this belt become the official WWE Championship belt now that someone other than John Cena has held it? Web kai2000 1 February 2006

I'd say no. The use of it during Edge's short run as champ is most likely because his run as champ was a last-minute decision, and the company didn't feel the need to switch back to the standard belt, only to have Cena regain the title a few weeks later and change the belt again.

If Cena drops the belt at WrestleMania 22, that will probably be the last you see of the "bling belt". - Chadbryant 20:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that. --sonicKAI 12:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Also, on August 23, 2005 Eric Bischoff was ready to present Kurt Angle with the "Undisputed" style belt before Vince McMahon intervened.

Is it worth noting that there was a plate on Cena's belt that changed from Smack-Down to Mon Nite Raw? It seems trivial but it is a fact of his custom belt, much like the smoking skull of Stone Cold's belt.--Mr Smashnbash 21:56, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

As soon as Cena stops becoming champion for a year like Triple H, the belt will probably go back to normal.

Well, now that

is the champ, he has the same belt, just with a "rated R" spinny thing. I think it will stay the same belt.

One thing, John Cena won the championship back tonight. I think he is going to change it back to the way he had it. When a wrestler does a custom desingn they usually get to keep that belt after they are no longer champion meaning that the belt edge through in the river was probably a cheap duplicate and Cena had the real one hanging up in his house. Cena will probably bring back the WWE spinner belt and claim he had another one made when it is really the same belt. After he looses it for good it will switch back to the traditional design and he will get to keep the belt that has the WWE spinner. However, while John Cena holds the belt the spinner belt is the Official belt. A custom designed belt for a wrestler is the "Official" belt until he looses the title and another champion who decides to go with a different custom design or the traditional design. But typically the custom designed bet is actually owned by the wrestler who it was designed for.

For your information it was Vince McMahon's idea to change the design of the WWE Championship. That is why the "Undisputed" belt design was abandon.

I was looking at the page "Big Gold" and was lead to the page on the WWE Undisputed Championship page. In the discussion section it states that it (being the unified title,the title JBL held until "he" won) was sold at a private auction. So, if this is true, you may be looking at Cena's title as "the" WWE Championship.--Frontiers Of Honour 20:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

hey i think when Cena drops the WWE Title, they're gonna change it back to the Original one when guys like JBL and Eddie Guerrero had it. J.C. 22:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I think this is the permanent design, proof is that they had the belt as the WWE championship for 2 years already and thats not really "temporary", secondly is that WWE has made the spinner stay straight since Cena got the belt back from Edge at Unforgiven 2006 thus making it look like a real and "non spinner" belt, plus Vince Mcmahon wanted to change the belt because he didnt like the "Undisputed" version. It's not really "John Cena's" belt anymore because other superstars have held it and if it was Cena's personal belt it would have a chain lock thing as the spinner and not the WWE logo, and in Cena's us title there wasnt a nameplate as the WWE championship has a removable nameplate for other names. Lakersprototype2448 19:59 4 Jul 2007(PMT)

Personally I think the spinner design sucks. I think its a disgrace to all the past WWF/WWE Champions.

Was the 1992 Royal Rumble really a transitive match considering the title was vacant? Also didnt the Iron Man match at WrestleMania XII last longer than 62 minutes?

I couldn't think of a succinct term meaning "match in which the title changed hands". According to Solie's title histories, the '92 Rumble lasted longer than any of the iron man matches in which the belt was won.

McPhail

19:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Now, according to this page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Rumble_%281992%29 , the 92 royal rumble was under 1 hour 2 minutes, which would put the Wrestlemania XII at the longest transitive match.--Azslande 05:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

The Ironman match was 62:52, the royal rumble was 63:14

I added a note about champs that lost the title 24 hrs after winning it, given the fact that its a common practice for a "rematch clause" to be invoked 24 hrs later. Hogan's 24 hr reign, though, was caused by him being stripped of the title after the finish to the title match at Tuesday in Texas, so Im not sure if that would constitute a 24 hr reign like the other examples.

I think that Cena's version of the title should be picture at the top of the page until he loses it. My reasoning is that it is the current version being used, and thus the one that would be associated with the phrase "WWE Championship" among the general public presently. Additionally, the "bling-bling" version has been in use since Cena debuted it in April 2005, so its been legitimately around for awhile now.

If he drops the strap to Triple H at Wrestlemania 22, I see the "Undisputed style" version coming back, so if and when that happens, it can go back to the top.

Also, we should try to locate a picture of the two "WWF Attitude" versions of this belt, as they are noticably absent from the page. The first was introduced the night after Austin's Wrestlemania XIV win (blue strap, classic WWF logo) and lasted until July 1998 when he introduced the smoking skull belt. The second was in use from November 1998 until April 2002 (black strap, Attitude WWF/E Logo) with breaks in use for Austin's pre-heel turn reigns.Mattbwn

Are their any pics of the belt prior to the 1988 version?Basbalfrk 22:10, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

I am looking, and have found bad quality pictures. The one that is the most easy of the pre 1988 WWF Belt is the one with Hogan posing in a steel cage for a promo of WrestleMania 2. SFrank85 02:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

This might be a minor point, but the image of the Smoking Skull belt currently being used in this article is inaccurate to how the belt actually appeared; the belt shown is actually a replica with the WWF logo replaced with the WWE logo (and the "Attitude" logo removed from the sides). If somebody could find a high-quality picture of the actual WWF Attitude belt, that would be great (though in lieu of that, the current picture will probably suffice). Jeff Silvers 02:26, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

The Attittude era belt is a replica with the new logo on it too. WWE seams to be doing that to all of the replica belts. I've even seen pictures of the Winged Eagle belt with the WWE Legend logo on it. (The one that is the old WWF logo without the 'F' part on it.) I've been looking and it's hard to find pictures with the original WWF logo on it. Even back then when it was the current logo, it was hard to find those pictures. I'm not sure if anybody can find it. SilentRage 23:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

The judgement against WWE gained by the World Wildlife Fund precludes WWE using the Attitude-era "scratch" logo in any fashion for merchandise or promotion. Hence, any pics of belt replicas are going to substitute the later logo (the "scratch" logo sans "F"). The "Word Life" logo from a few years ago is now being used in some cases to replace the "classic" WWF logo. - Chadbryant 05:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

I remember seeing pictures of Hulk Hogan with a round belt that looked like it was green. I believe there is a picture of him kissing it on his WWE HoF page. Can I suggest that somebody add a picture of that belt and any previous belt designs to the Belt Design section of this article? SilentRage 23:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Anyone know when the two names were used? I don't recall the World Heavyweight bit used in the late 90s.

• The WWE Championship, as currently defended on RAW; Is officially recognised as the WWE Heavyweight Championship. From 1963 until the 1997 Wrestlemania, the belt was referred to as the 'WWF World Heavyweight Championship', after which it became the 'World Wrestling Federation Championship'until may 4th 2002, when it was renamed the 'WWE Championship'

• Actually, from 1971 to 1983 the title was only referred to as the WW(W)F Heavyweight Championship as they were members of the NWA during that time and recognized the NWA World title as their World Title. The title had to following names at the following times:

• World Wide Wrestling Federation World Heavyweight Title (April 1963-1971)
• World Wide Wrestling Federation Heavyweight Title (1971-March 1979)
• World Wrestling Federation Heavyweight Title (March 1979-1983)
• World Wrestling Federation World Heavyweight Title (1983-December 2001)
• World Wrestling Federation "Undisputed" World Heavyweight Title (December 2001-May 2002)
• World Wrestling Entertainment "Undisputed" World Heavyweight Title (May 2002-August 2002)
• World Wrestling Entertainment Title (August 2002-Present)

Theophilus75 15:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Why does it say he is on this page, and multiple other pages? They say he won it at ONS2, but that hasn't even happened yet!

Cause people see some supposed "spoiler" on a dirt sheet site and want to accept it as how it will actually turn out. Basbalfrk 22:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

OK the WWE title is still the WWE title not ECW title people

rvd isnt yet officialy the WWE champion, its still indispute and you cant ignore the fact that it hasnt been officialy given to RVD yet. if this is a live encyolpedia i think these facts should be put in, WWE doesnt show RVD or Cena the champion.

If RVD wasn't the champion, then why wouldn't Vince McMahon have said something on RAW about it? wwe.com also lists RVD as the current WWE Champion: http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/wwechampionship/ TJ Spyke 22:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

I added this article to "Category:Extreme Championship Wrestling championships" due to the title's current exclusivity (is that a word?) to the ECW brand. If (and when) the title is returned to RAW, this category should not be reverted, as de facto Wikipedia policy places titles in categories according to not only their current host promotion, but also former ones (see WWE United States Championship, which is in the categories for WWE, WCW, NWA, and Jim Crockett titles). Jeff Silvers 03:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

WWE continues to use the customized belt, as when Edge won the belt it fit into his character of the Rated R Superstar, when Cena won the strap back it obviously didn't change, however when RVD won the title, he said he'd keep it because "it spins". When Edge won the title back again it fits into his character, so I'd say until a more "traditional" wrestler such as Triple H, Shawn Michaels, Randy Orton, Ric Flair etc. win the title it will remain the custom "bling-bling" championship.

Jackez Wednesday 12 Huly 2006 (By the way feel free the edit the comment, I'm still getting used to this)

Actually, I'm guessing the reason Edge and Van Dam both kept the spinner belt was because management knew they would both probably be dropping the title back to Cena again soon. Or it could just be that WWE intends on keeping the spinner belt. While that doesn't seem too plausible, keep in mind that this belt has been used for over a year now—much longer than any recent champion-specific "novelty" belt. Jeff Silvers 13:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

--Matthew f 04:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Matthew±dsd

Once again Vince McMahon wanted to change the design of the WWE Championship to distinguish it from the WWE Undisputed Championship. Big Boss 0 14:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I have to agree that the WWE wanting to change the image of the title is plausible. Peace,

22:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

just a question about the title belt !!! ( IMPORTANT )

I saw all the pictures of the WWE title, but, the very second championship belt existed from 1970-1980 and the Third belt existed from 1986-1987, so, does that mean that between 1981-1985 the title was NOT represented by a belt? cuz i know that there definately WAS a BELT, so, where is it? --T00C00L 01:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I think the belt Hogan is holding here might be the 1980s title.

McPhail

14:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Hogan actually used at least four different belt designs during his first run as WWF Champion:

• The belt he initially won from the Iron Sheik (the hideous green belt)
• The belt seen in the pic provided by McPhail (he uses this style at the Wrestling Challenge PPV & WrestleMania 2)
• Another redesign, which he carried to the ring at WrestleMania III
• The belt design unveiled in early 1988, which was later presented to Randy Savage at WrestleMania IV and used for over 10 years, through the beginning of Steve Austin's reign as champion)

Hogan has noted in his book and elsewhere that he went through several title belts during 1984-87, because his sweat mixed with how many appearances he as doing literally caused the

leather in the belts to fall apart. - Chadbryant 15:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

I Guess They Are Still Useing the title as it is now the New WWE Championship Dicks

hey who the hell is doing this^!!! Do NOT make statements especially if it has nothing to do to improve wikipedia's articles!!! T00C00L 03:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

There's at least one other belt design that I know that was used for the WWF(or WWE whichever you prefer to call it)Championship. It was used briefly by Hulk Hogan and I'm pretty sure he was wearing it during the first Wrestlemania. I don't know if any recalls this but the belt design I'm referring to looked idential to the NWA World Television Championship that Tully Blanchard was defending during the mid-80's. I don't know how long the design was used, not long I don't believe, but I remember it clearly.

i see that, in the belt pics there is a belt from 1982-1984 and the next belt was from 1986-1987, so what does that mean that there was NO title belt during 1985!!! T00C00L 13:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

No it just means that the pics that were there before have been deleted. --

16

16:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

NO, pic has been deleted!!! its never been there, we MUST search, obtain and post on the main page!!! T00C00L 13:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The pre-88 Hogan belt was smashed to pieces and stored at Stamford before being used as the first Hardcroe belt. Darrenhusted 15:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

The belt used between the Green Strap belt, and the Hogan 86' is this one I hope somehow it can be added to the gallery of the belts.

Is currently listed as John Cena at c. 2 minutes but that hardly can be counted because he was Champion going into the Elimination Chamber match. The

03:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

THe addition was wrong; Cena did not win the title in the Chamber. The match itself was very short, but still considerably longer than Backlund / Diesel.

McPhail

09:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Ta, just wanted to post here before changing it myself. Mattlore 09:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

heyJAY HARPER 16:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, so last night on RAW, Edge revealed his new belt. But the only thing that changed was the "spinner" part of the belt, and it changed to an Edge-specific detail. So why is it considered a whole new title belt? Shouldn't it be only noted with Billy Graham and Ultimate Warrior's redisigned title belts, as it's just a redisign of the spinner belt? Just curious. --72.74.19.240 23:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

It is a new belt because it was chucked in the water and edge revieled a new one, he didnt pull off the spinner and stick on a new one. I know in reality it probabally is the same belt but it cant be proved. SKRIBUL 20:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Quick question...is the photo of Edge's belt a photoshopped image? It's just that apart from the spinner detail, it is the exact same pic. Can we have no pic until we get an ACTUAL photo of the belt? --Andyroo316 20:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Well it's not Photoshopped but an ACTUAL authentic quality image probably won't be available until replicas are made available on WWEshop.com and that could take weeks. I say stick with this for now since it's of similar quality to the rest of the modern belt images on the article. Oh and No it's not the exact same image apart from the rest of the Gold Plates, by the way. The Plates and Strap are slightly lighter in tone. --

16

20:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I knew someone was going to make that point, and I agree. However, I still don't feel comfortable recognizing it as a whole new championship belt when everything but the spinning logo is the same. Plus, I'm fairly certain that unlike Cena's spinner, other champions aren't going to use Edge's belt if they win the title, since Edge's is really specific to him and him alone. Whatever, though. It's your guys' call. --72.74.19.240 23:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, because HHH would have really used Cena's Spinner belt? No way he woulda - it's too 'Cena' and HHH has heavy rock music as his entrance, so it wouldn't suit him at all. We can't be sure lots of champs would have used Cena's spinner title, because the only other person to use it was Edge...for a whole three weeks *sarcastic smiley* --Andyroo316 23:52, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

You forget, RVD had it too. As for HHH (and probably others), you're correct. The point I was trying to make is that other wrestlers would be much more likely to use Cena's spinner than Edge's, since Edge's is specific to him and him alone, while Cena's had just the WWE Logo instead. --71.162.82.170 17:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

I guess...but Stone Cold's smoking skull belt was REALLY specific to him as well. Edge's is only the same as Austin's, so if Austin's counts, so should Edge's. --Andyroo316 19:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Is there not a picture of the custom Rock Brahma Bull belt anywhere? Even though it wasn't on TV it would be a nifty little link to put on the page, wouldn't it? Bdve 03:48, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

I think Jakks Pacific released a toy replica of it. I'd check on eBay. --

3:16

04:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah. I found one. [3] Go check it out. --

3:16

04:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

According to WWE.com, they're the same title. The Undisputed Championship is part of the WWE Championship lineage, so what's the purpose of having two seperate articles for the same championship? http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/wwechampionship/ Odin's Beard 02:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm guessing it's just to separate them - the Undisputed Title was a massive deal at the time as it unified the two most famous/prestigious ever North American World championships. It's kinda like having separate articles for each

Wrestlemania as well as the main page - just to separate it up, so (1) there isn't a massive long page and (2) because they are each important on their own. --Andyroo316

19:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

I still don't see a reason why it needs it's own article. A section devoted to it in the WWE Championship article would be sufficient considering the title was in circulation for less than a year and was only held by six wrestlers. It's merely a brief footnote in the WWE Championship's history and lineage. Odin's Beard 23:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree.(Halbared 01:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC))

Yes, but then why not put all of the Wrestlemania's into the same article? This isn't a "it's the same championship" issue, it's simply to cut down each article's size so a reader doesn't have to trawl through so much. And actually, it wasn't a brief footnote anyway. If we were to include it in this page, we'd also have to stick it into the

WWE Undisputed Championship page. It is actually a major point in wrestling championship history and should be noted. Plus the size of articles issue. --Andyroo316

00:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. If the title's lineage is directly (and officially) linked to the WWE Championship, then it should be contained within that article regardless of whether we consider it important or not. Comparing it to the WCW World Heavyweight Championship is comparing apples to oranges: the WCW title existed in a seperate promotion and had a lengthier and much more detailed history than the WWE Undisputed Championship, which didn't even last nine months. It was perceived as notable at the time, but didn't pan out that way in the long-run. And, taken into current context, I think it's best suited as a sub-section for the WWE Championship entry. Deputy Marshall 23:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

The Undisputed championship is the same as belt as the origanal WWE championship yet the World Heavyweight championship is different than the WCW Heavyweight championship because the WWE version has the WWE logo therefore the Undisputed championship artcle should be merged into the WWE championship article. Sept.23 2006 21:04 BY: A WWE Fan

The Undisputed title is unique because a lot of title histories recognise the champion as carrying two belts at once, so not only was Hogan the last WWE champion but his Undisputed reign also counts as a WCW title reign, this page can help clarify that. Not only that but the list of champions is short and this page will help anyone who wants to know what happened once Jericho unified the titles, and how the World title was created, it will have to be duplicated on both the WWE championship and World championship pages, whereas as a seperate page it is more clear what happened. Darrenhusted 15:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

After Chris Jericho won both titles to merge them into the WWE Championship, the WCW World Title ceased to exist. After Brock Lesnar started wrestling exclusively for Smackdown, the Undisputed Championship reverted to being called the WWE Championship while the World Heavyweight Title was created and presented to Triple H. While it's design is virtually identical to that of the WCW Title, it's not. They don't have the same lineage. The whole lineage thing can be a bit confusing but I fail to see how Hulk Hogan's reign with the title counts as a WCW World Title reign. Odin's Beard 23:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

The WWE Undisputed Championship is both the WWE and WCW Championships combined. When Triple H defeated Chris Jericho at WM18, he became the WWE and WCW Champion. Therefore when Hulk Hogan, The Undertaker, The Rock, and Brock Lesnar won the WWE Undisputed Championship, they were the WWE and WCW Champion combined with one belt. When Brock decided to exclusively defend the WWE Undisputed Championship only on Smackdown, the Title then became disputed. Brock was then only the WWE Champion, ½ of the Undisputed “Title”. In my opinion, that is when the WCW Championship either became defunct or “transformed” into the “World” Title exclusive to Raw. If you recall, the WCW Championship, after the Survivor Series in 2001, became known as the “World” Championship. Even though the WWE doesn’t say it, I think that the Championship you see today on Smackdown should have the linage of the WCW World Championship. Seriously, it looks the same with the exception of the WWE logo on top to show who is number 1.--Prince Patrick 18:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Nobody is denying that the designs of the World Title and WCW World Titles are virtually identical. But, unless the WWE states that the titles have the same lineage, and the WWE hasn't, then it's just personal opinion on your part. Odin's Beard 23:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

So who is the last WCW Champion??--Prince Patrick 00:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

As far as I know, I might be wrong, it was Chris Jericho. Jericho won both the WCW and WWE Championships when they were unified into the WWE Undisputed Championship. If I'm not mistaken, Jericho was annouced as the new WCW World Heavyweight Champion after winning that title from The Rock. If, for whatever reason, the actual last WCW Champion wasn't Jericho, then it'd have to have been The Rock. Odin's Beard 01:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I thought it would either be Booker T or Triple H. I might have said Booker T, because he was the last Champion for Turner's WCW. I might have said Triple H because, he was the last to hold the actual "WCW" version of the belt at WM18, and Eric Bischoff mentioned that he was the last person to hold the "Big Gold Belt" (This being, of course, if the World Championship Title on Smackdown today doesn't, in fact, have anything to do with WCW's version). I see why you would say Chris Jericho, but I don't see why you would say the Rock, unless the WCW Title was abandoned after Jericho unified both Titles. I still think, without any real reasoning except for logic, that the Smackdown World Title is apart of the WCW lineage. I guess it doesn’t really matter as long as the WWE “revision” with no consistency. I don’t care. I still love WWE and hate TNA.--Prince Patrick 02:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

The WCW World Title has been abandoned. When the WWE purchased WCW, they kept the WCW World Heavyweight Title around, possibly in the hopes of relaunching the franchise in some way. I'm not sure about that, but I do remember that they kept it around due to the fact that several WWE wrestlers won the title and it was still referred to as the WCW World Heavyweight Championship. While The Rock held it, and Jericho won it from him the night it was merged with the WWE Championship, it was still referred to as the WCW World Heavyweight Championship. After Brock Lesnar won the WWE Undisputed Championship, the "Undisputed" was dropped and it was simply referred to as the WWE Championship again. Now, during this time, the WWE stopped using the WCW World Title and created the World Heavyweight Title. It looks virtually identical, but it's recognized by the WWE as a completley seperate championship. On WWE.com, you can view the championship history and lineage of a number of different titles, some of which aren't used any longer. The WCW World Heavyweight Championship isn't listed. If you look under the history for the World Heavyweight Championship, you'll see that it's lineage began in 2002 when it was given to Triple H. It's the WWE's position that the they're not the same championship. Anything else is pure speculation or just personal opinion. Odin's Beard 23:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I’m still confused, but that was a great explanation. So, I guess Jericho was the last WCW Champion, being that the WCW Title was absorbed into the WWE Title. Thanks for the insight.--Prince Patrick 16:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh trust me, a lot of it still confuses me. The WWE just simply stopped using the WCW World Heavyweight Championship and created the World Championship. I know that they did it, but I don't exactly know why they did it. As far as I know, they've never made a statement about it. They have been known to just drop storylines, and occassionally titles, without really an explanation. Odin's Beard 23:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

That is true. I’m still waiting for the WWE’s explanation as to what happened to the Light Heavyweight Title after X-Pac left and what happened to the Hardcore Title. Did Edge give it back to Mick Foley?? I guess we, as fans (Smart, Mark, or Smark) will never know.--Prince Patrick 16:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

The Rock and Chris Jericho were both recognised as WCW champions prior to the merging of the titles and from what I understand Booker T's fifth reign was under WWF's ownership. It should be noted that the Undisputed title represented both belts and before they removed it WWEtitlehistories.com added a WCW reign to all who held the Undisputed title and I think they even listed Undertaker and Brock Lesnar as being one time WCW champions in their 2004 preview magazine. However I think the article is important and should be kept as a seperate article. Darrenhusted 16:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Kurt Angle also won the WCW Title under WWE ownership. So by what you’re saying, as far as the Undisputed Title is concerned, in connection to the WCW Title, is Brock Lesner the last WCW Champion since the Title was then disputed, or is John Cena or Booker T technically the “current” WCW Champion?? In theory the WCW Championship lineage could have: 1) continued with the WWE ½ of the Undisputed Title, because the World Title today is supposed to be a newly created Title, or 2) became the World Title and took the WCW ½ of the Undisputed Title, and they just didn’t want to mention it. If nobody can explain this, it’s okay. We are all in agreement that WWE (Raw, Smackdown, and ECW) is better than TNA. HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--Prince Patrick 21:00, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I think this has been made a lot more complicated than it had to be I think. WWE redoes a storyline involving a title, or a title in and of itself, whenever the need arises for them to do so. I doubt that all of the facts surrounding some of the lineage controversies will be known to us. We're pretty much just going to have to go with the facts we have. Since the "Undisputed" was dropped from the WWE Championship, the WCW World Title doesn't exist anymore. I can only speculate that since WCW wasn't around any longer, and it wouldn't make much sense for them to keep using a world title of a different organization that no longer exists for one of their brands, they just figured to create a different title. Why they kept the same design, minus a logo change, I can only guess it's because of recognition. I'd say that it's the most recognized title design in pro wrestling history. As far as Brock Lesnar or the Undertaker being declared former WCW World Champions due to winning the WWE Undisputed Championship, I've never read or heard anything about that. If that were the case, then it would apply to the other wrestlers that won the championship and I've never heard any of them referred to as a former WCW World Champion, other than Hulk Hogan because he won it 6 times while working for WCW and The Rock because he held it after the WWE purchased WCW but before the creation of the WWE Undisputed Championship. Odin's Beard 23:42, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I'll agree with that answer.--Prince Patrick 07:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

I think we all can still agree that the WCW title is still part of the WWE title. Vermon CaTaffy 8 00:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Not really. The WCW Championship has its own lineage history in the title history section on WWE.com. According to it, Chris Jericho was the last WCW Champion, winning it the night it was unified with the WWF Championship in order to make the "Undisputed" Championship. They're considered to be two seperate championships. Maybe the plan was for the WCW Championship's lineage to be unified with the WWE's at one time, but that's not the case any longer.Odin's Beard 22:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I added Macho Man Randy Savage's name to the list of WWF/E Champions who have held the title for more than a year. He won it for the first time at WrestleMania IV on March 27, 1988 and lost it to Hulk Hogan on April 2, 1989. I also removed the (twice) statement from Bruno Sammartino's name. Didn't really seem relavant and since he's the only wrestler in WWE history to have two world title reigns to last more than a year, it should have it's own mention.Odin's Beard 00:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

It say's calendar tho, and Savage's wasn't a calendar year.(Halbared 08:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC))

Could you clarify? I don't see how March 27th, 1988 to April 2nd, 1989 (371 days) isn't considered a calendar year. Deputy Marshall 21:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Last time I heard, 12 months equaled a year. From March 27, 1988 to March 27, 1989 is approximately 1 year. I really don't want to turn this into some sort of debate where we start splitting hairs. Odin's Beard 23:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. Deputy Marshall 01:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

ok this is just an idea, so Smackdown holds the old WCW title with minor change in design, ECW has the ECW championship belt. SO the Belt on Raw should be the old Adittude edition belt, to reflect the old rivaly that they had in the past?

Good thinking there. But I think the WWE looks at the Monday Night Wars way too much. --Raderick 11:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

the current WWE championship title belt design has chamged a lot over the days, i think someone should update the title belt picture and replace the old picture on the main page with the picture of the current pic.

OK this page lists Randy Orton as the youngest person to hold the title, but Orton was never WWE Champion. Rather he was the WWE

05:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Some editors do confuse Randy Orton's World Heavyweight Championship reign with the WWE Championship. A week or so ago on Raw, Jim Ross himself misspoke and called Orton the youngest WWE Champion ever, although he did correct himself a few moments later. Odin's Beard 01:52, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

This may be confusion with generic terms of WWE champion and World Champion, Randy Orton now holds the record for youngest World Champion in WWE history, while he did hold the World Heavyweight Championship, it still makes him youngest World Champion in the WWE's history, younger then Brock Lesnar when he first won the WWE Championship. Triple H also referred to him as the youngest WWE champion, but as I typed before, it's in reference to both WWE World titles as being on the same level with each other. TonyFreakinAlmeida 01:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Either way, he never held this specific belt, and this page is for the belt designated the WWE Championship. Make a page called WWE World Champion and then you can call him the youngest. -- Scorpion 01:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I read that McMahon is rovoking the history books so that RVD is never considered the WWE Champion. get ready for some editing.

• Where? And who are you? This comment just seems a bit random. And learn to spell, revoking. Darrenhusted 18:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

As much as I would like to believe you (I hate RVD so much!) show us some proof to your statement. Big Boss 0 14:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

If it were true that would be interesting Vermon CaTaffy 8 00:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

i believe that the parrallel belts should be merged with the consistant belts because it is harder to read and understand and there is reallt NO POINT in having it there!!!!!!!!!!!!

• What parallel belts? What are you talking about?1978