Talk:Winmark

Winmark has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 22, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Winmark appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 October 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that a report around 2013 on American used goods outlets put Goodwill first with a 21% market share, Winmark second with nearly 6%, and The Salvation Army third with nearly 4%? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Winmark.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Minnesota Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Winmark/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 21:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one. Sagecandor (talk) 21:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for

1. Well written?: Good size introduction. Good writings style here, nice and concise and succinct wording presentation. Good sentence structure and size per sentence. Going forwards, I would suggest breaking up the "History" section into two smaller subsections and keeping the larger "history" section as the parent section for those. "Franchises" section: be careful about tense changes here, but overall pretty good.

2. Verifiable?: Cited for all statements asserted in the article to in-line citations. Good format of citations and good presentation for references section. Great job with making sure to avoid Wikipedia:Link rot for the future, nice work.

3. Broad in coverage?: Article is very thorough, covering all major aspects of the topic including history, franchises, subsidiaries, good infobox, good introduction section.

4. Neutral point of view?: Though the article topic is indeed a publicly-listed company, it does not have any promotional tone that comes across. Appears to present history and francise information in a matter of fact, neutral manner.

5. Stable? Checking stability article edit history is stable going back to September 2016. Talk page doesn't have any ongoing conflicts or problems.

6. Images?: One image used File:Winmark logo.png, public domain as just letters.

Encyclopedic tone. Educational article about a large publicly traded company. Not promotional in nature which is good. Nicely done ! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 04:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the good article review, Sagecandor (talk · contribs)! I'll work on making improvements to the article based on your feedback in the "Well written?" section. Cunard (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works.

• What I think should be changed (include citations):

Hi there, I'm a PR contracted by the Winmark Corporation. The team flagged a number of inaccuracies and out-of-date information in their article. I was advised to submit an edit request instead of changing the page directly. Citable material for the below is provided in the corresponding section.

CHANGE: "In 2000, John Morgan replaced Dahlberg as CEO and renamed the company to Winmark in 2001. Morgan rescued Winmark from the verge of bankruptcy by selling financially failing franchise concepts and stores and replacing the management team." REASON: This is explicitly promotional of a given individual, and not cited.

CHANGE: Its subsidiary Wirth Business Credit is a small-business supplies leasing company. REASON: Wirth Business Credit is no longer a Winmark subsidiary.

CHANGE: In 2016, Winmark had a $1 billion market share in the $17 billion resell industry through its 1,170 franchisees. REASON: Out of date info: store count has now reached 1,291

CHANGE: CEO Brett Heffes is now also Chairman of Board of Directors

• Why it should be changed:

Statistics are no longer accurate and several years out of date.

• References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

For current count of stores, sales, other topline figures: ^[1]

For Heffes Board Appointment:

^[2]

Winmark update (talk) 15:49, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Declined None of the proposed changes are supported by citations to

reliable sources. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]