Telephone interpreting

Part of a series on
Translation
Types
Legal Literary Bible Quran Kural Linguistic validation Medical Regulatory Technical Interpretation Cultural Word-for-word Sense-for-sense Homophonic
Theory
Translation studies Skopos theory Translation project Translation criticism Dynamic and formal equivalence Contrastive linguistics Polysystem theory
Technologies
CAT Machine translation Mobile translation Translation management system Dubbing Subtitling Pre-editing Postediting Multimedia translation
Localization
Glocalization Internationalization and localization Language localization Video game localization Dub localization Website localization Software localization
Institutional
Associations Awards Organizations Schools
Related topics
Untranslatability Transcription Transliteration Video relay service (VRS) Telephone interpreting Language barrier Fan translation (of video games) Fansub Fandub Scanlation Journalistic translation Books and magazines on translation Bible translations by language Translated books List of most translated works Translators Kural translations by language
v t e

Telephone interpreting connects human

• 1950s: Telephone lines first proposed as a medium for the delivery of interpreting services.[1]
• 1973: Australia introduces telephone interpretation as a fee-free service to respond to its growing immigrant communities.^[2]
• 1981: The first Over-the-Phone Interpretation (OPI) service is offered in the United States.^{[3][self-published source?]}
• 1981–1990: Telephone interpreting enters major U.S. industries including financial services, telecommunications, healthcare, and public safety.^{[4][self-published source?]}
• 1990s: The demand for telephone interpreting grows significantly; contributing factors include decreased prices in long-distance calls, toll-free number access, and immigration trends.^[4]
• 1995: Language services company Kevmark, later known as
  CyraCom, patents a multiple-handset phone adapted for telephone interpreting.^[5]
• 1999:
  Language Line Services.^[6]
• 2000s: Telephone interpretation becomes more sophisticated; quality of interpreting, faster connection speeds, and customer service become important to consumers.[4]
• 2005: The U.S. telephone interpreting market is estimated at $200 million.^[4]
• 2013: Language Lines Services acquires Pacific Interpreters.^[7]
• 2016: France-based company Teleperformance announces plans to buy LanguageLine Solutions for $1.52 billion.^[8]

Providers

There are many types of organizations that provide telephone interpreting services, including for-profit companies, governmental organizations, non-profit groups, and internal divisions within organizations. For example, the government of Australia operates a telephone interpreting service,^[9] as do the governments of South Africa and New Zealand.^[10][11]

United States

In the United States, telephone interpreting is widely used by its federal courts.^[12] Numerous commercial providers are also available and commonly used. Many of the commercial telephone interpreting providers connect users with interpreters for more than 150 languages. Some providers claim to have the ability to connect an interpreter at any time of day, within a matter of seconds. Some hospitals and health care systems also provide telephone interpreting services.^[13]

Major providers of telephone interpretation in the United States include

In 2013, Language Line Services acquired Pacific Interpreters.[7]

United Kingdom

This section relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this section by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Telephone interpreting" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

British social activist Michael Young noticed that language barriers were leading to substandard services for ethnic minorities at Royal London Hospital, so he obtained grant funding to provide free telephone interpreters starting in 1990. He branded this service the Language Line, and which went on to become the UK company Language Line Limited. The company grew significantly in its public sector client base, from Police on the Isle of Dogs (his second client) across clients in most sectors.^[15]

In 2006, the US corporate Language Line Inc. acquired Language Line Ltd. However, during 2006, the Department for Work and Pensions created the "Pan Government Framework for Telephone Interpreting" (contract reference CAG/912/0181).^[16] This was the first national contract encompassing the UK public sector telephone interpreting provision, and it was awarded to UK competitor thebigword. Driven by the contract win, thebigword developed the UK's first proprietary telephone interpreting platform in 2007 under the stewardship of Simon Moxon and Jonathan Potter.

At that time, the US market was roughly 8-years more advanced: telephone interpreting was more broadly accepted as a substitute service for many face-to-face interpreted situations, viewed much more as a commodity, and where technological innovation was driving supplier dominance. The UK's approach to delivery was very much shaped by this, with one key difference: in the US 80% of non-English demand was Spanish, whereas UK demand was driven by a more diverse dispersion of Eastern European migratory languages.^[17]

By 2008 the value of this Pan Government contract had exceeded £12m, however when considering extraneous areas of public, private and third-sector spend at this time, the UK telephone interpreting whole-market value is estimated at £20m. This is the first known UK telephone interpreting market valuation. Since that period, public sector contracting has dominated the landscape. Unlike the de facto demand of Spanish in the US the rapid Telephone interpretation growth in the UK was driven by the Disability Discrimination Act (replaced by the Equality Act), and the migratory influences of Europe. This is why market growth in the private sector is much smaller in the UK.

There is now a prevalence of companies that offer this service, many on a global basis which is a natural benefit of "virtualising" interpretation. Similarly to translation, the diversity of organisations cover generic interpretation, as well as domain-specific services such as legal, medical, pharmaceutical and other technical. The UK and US markets are also very heavily influenced by the fact they are largely delivered by a freelance supply chain.

Equipment

Users typically access telephone interpreting services with a telephone or computer with

• Automated: an
  Dual Tone Multi Frequency (DTMF) data into a request for connecting to an interpreter in a specific language (identified by unique language-codes
  ).
• Operator-led: utilise customer-care staff to answer the call, gather the required information from the caller, and facilitate the connection to the interpreter. A service of this nature can be preferred by organisations such as emergency services, where the client's knowledge of language codes is absent.

Additionally, some of the companies that have the required capability will offer a hybrid of the two principles, where for example a customer can:

• Call in to the service
• Input their "account code" into a single-layer Interactive Voice Response (IVR) using the phone keypad
• Be connected to a call-centre agent who will already know who the caller is, and will facilitate other data capture relevant to the call (including the required language)

Uses

Telephone interpreting is widely used in a number of settings, including health care,^[18] government, hospitals, financial, emergency telephone call centres (e.g. '9-1-1' or '1-1-2'), and others. Telephone interpreting is especially helpful for settings in which the two parties would communicate via telephone anyway, such as interactions between call centers and consumers, calls between members of the public and emergency telephone call centres, etc. Telephone interpreting can be used to take applications over the phone and help individuals with account issues.

Telephone interpretation via

, which are different from the aural version of the same principal language.

Market

This section relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this section by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Telephone interpreting" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

In 2007, the global telephone interpreting market was claimed to be worth $700 million, with an estimated $500 million generated in the United States. Industry analyst firm Common Sense Advisory estimates that in 2012, the market will be worth $1.2 billion, an increase of 70% from 2007. The market for telephone interpreting is global in scope and includes companies from the United States, the Netherlands, Sweden, France, the United Kingdom, Canada, India, China, Norway, Spain, and Hong Kong.[19]

It has to be noted however that market-size estimates have historically been fundamentally flawed for two principal reasons. Reports and sources such as all of those referenced above rely almost entirely on self-reporting by the service providers in the industry, with no substantive way of corroborating or validating. Secondly and most importantly, because of the nature of telephone interpreting as an on-demand commoditised service, this industry segment is notoriously incestuous. The prevalence of subcontracting has created a complex and volatile web of cross-dependencies, with some end-customer calls traversing a chain of organisations each subcontracting to the next. This concatenation means that the volumes of business declared in market-wide surveys incorporates a significant amount of double, triple and even quadruple counting.

See also

• Language interpretation
• Video Relay Service
  : for use where a deaf/hard-of-hearing/speech-impaired person is not located at the same place as the hearing person. The sign language interpreter is additionally situated in a third location, typically a video-enabled relay call centre.
• sign language interpreter
  located off-site.

References

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Telephone interpreting" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Notes