Search results

Results 1 – 20 of 11,891
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

There is a page named "Template:Close paraphrasing inline" on Wikipedia

View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • Copyvio inline)
    inline version to tag a sentence or paragraph {{Copypaste}} – for articles or sections that appear to be copy-pasted from another source {{Close paraphrasing}}...
    541 bytes (362 words) - 00:45, 20 December 2017
  • Within policy, being neutral, citing sources with inline citations and containing no close paraphrasing (from what I can confirm; most of the sources are...
    8 KB (951 words) - 20:21, 31 August 2014
  • Neutral tone has been used. Article has at least one inline citation per para. No close paraphrasing detected. Hook fact check out with the OBC ref. QPQ...
    7 KB (867 words) - 07:54, 10 April 2021
  • is interesting and cited in a reliable source. No copyvio or close paraphrasing. Inline citations to reliable sources. QPQ done. Ready to go. Bali88 (talk)...
    2 KB (186 words) - 12:17, 10 May 2015
  • policies on neutrality and copyright, and appears to be free of close paraphrasing Inline citations all check out Hook is "125 characters", correctly formatted...
    3 KB (249 words) - 16:22, 3 May 2021
  • hook) is cited; article is well written and cited inline throughout; no overly close paraphrasing noticed - Dumelow (talk) 11:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)...
    6 KB (601 words) - 13:36, 8 November 2020
  • close paraphrasing seen. Image appears in this article and is freely-licensed. Online hook ref verified, offline hook ref AGF, and both cited inline....
    6 KB (706 words) - 11:12, 14 April 2021
  • 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and completion of QPQ. Such a...
    5 KB (543 words) - 08:54, 29 January 2019
  • does "citations are good" mean? Did you check for neutrality and close paraphrasing? Inline cite for the hook fact? Image licensing? Complete QPQ review?...
    5 KB (653 words) - 07:36, 18 October 2019
  • 2014 (UTC). Expanded more than 5x, long enough, free of close paraphrasing, includes inline citations, and is neutral. Hook is fine, too. – Maky « talk »...
    2 KB (154 words) - 06:35, 11 April 2021
  • easily be close paraphrasing. I'm going to ask Nikkimaria to take a look, since she's much better at drawing the line between paraphrasing and close paraphrasing...
    9 KB (1,149 words) - 20:49, 20 January 2016
  • New enough, long enough, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook ref verified and cited inline. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:02, 6 August 2014...
    9 KB (1,128 words) - 13:51, 2 November 2017
  • review. I've fixed most of the instances of close paraphrasing, where possible. I've also added another inline citation to verify the hook fact from what...
    5 KB (473 words) - 20:46, 10 March 2014
  • policy (neutral, cites reliable secondary sources with inline citations) Note: partly close paraphrasing with online sources, check result of Earwig's copyvio...
    3 KB (373 words) - 19:09, 13 January 2023
  • Template:Copyright violation (category Inline cleanup templates)
    inline version to tag a sentence or paragraph {{Copypaste}} – for articles or sections that appear to be copy-pasted from another source {{Close paraphrasing}}...
    573 bytes (303 words) - 05:13, 22 April 2021
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500
)