Template:Did you know nominations/2022 U.S. Open Cup Final

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know
), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

2022 U.S. Open Cup Final

Created by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 05:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC).

  • The article is long and new enough, well-sourced and well-referenced. No copyvio was observed. The hook is just interesting, short enough, backed by a reliable source both in the article and here. After the QPQ is provided, we can go with ALT1 the original hook. --Mhhossein talk 10:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
    • @Mhhossein: QPQ added. Still working on expanding the article. SounderBruce 23:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
      • @SounderBruce: Do you want me to review the page once the expansion job is finished? --Mhhossein talk 12:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
        • @Mhhossein: That would be preferable. In its current state it doesn't actually qualify (as it is missing some citations). SounderBruce 04:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
          • So please let me know where you're done. --Mhhossein talk 04:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
SounderBruce Mhhossein SL93 (talk) 20:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
It's stated with the following line: "which saw Republic FC become the first lower-division club to reach the Final since fellow current USL Championship club the Charleston Battery in 2008." As the final has already passed, perhaps I can write up some new hooks for approval? SounderBruce 22:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Got it, that's fine as it is. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
The very last sentence in the article needs a citation before this can be promoted. CSJJ104 (talk) 20:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

New hooks, now that the article is fully cited and mostly updated:

@RoySmith: Should this be good to go? SounderBruce 06:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

  • I can't find where ALT4 is supported by the source, but ALT2 and ALT3 check out, so this is good to go with either of those. It's not techniclaly a DYK disqualifier, but something is funky with how the "Details" section is formatted. That needs to be fixed, but I won't hold up the DYK approval. What's with the "onlyinclude" tag? -- RoySmith (talk) 13:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
    • ALT4 is backed up by the listing of results sprinkled through the article, which mentions each league (USL League Two, USL-1, USL Championship, MLS). The onlyinclude tag is to allow the result to be transcluded onto the parent competition article (2022 U.S. Open Cup) and is normal for soccer finals. SounderBruce 19:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)