Template:Did you know nominations/Taxi Driver (Alexander McQueen collection)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 12:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Taxi Driver (Alexander McQueen collection)

Created by Premeditated Chaos (talk). Self-nominated at 06:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Taxi Driver (Alexander McQueen collection); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - I love this hook (shame Man Stink probably isn't notable), but I don't think it quite matches what's said in the article. Thomas and Watt both say that McQueen and Ungless went drinking and forgot about the bags of clothes, but neither says that the forgetting was because of drunkenness. Perhaps:
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Moved from userspace today. All Earwig's hits >5% are quotes or titles. @Premeditated Chaos: Great read. Just the hook issue to resolve. Also, not a DYK issue, but is there a reason that Thomas 102–103 is cited next to Thomas 108–109? -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 19:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

    • Hey Tamzin, thanks for the review. The citation thing was a typo; both Wilson & Thomas discuss the incident at similar points in their books, and both books were released the same year. 102-103 was meant to be a cite to Wilson, which I've now fixed. Wilson is a little more explicit about the incident, quoting Ungless saying they danced and drank "for hours". How about...
    • That neatly elides the question of precisely how drunk they were, and I think it's reasonably supported by the sources. ♠PMC(talk) 22:43, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
      • I think that's a reasonable characterization of the sources, yeah. Approved for ALT3. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 01:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)