Template talk:Batman in film

	Film: Comic book Template‑class
Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.

Comics: DC Comics / Batman / Films Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Related work groups: /  This template is supported by DC Comics work group. This template is supported by Batman work group. This template is supported by Comic book films work group.

I dont think this article belongs in the template. its only tangentially related. If this goes here, how about other articles tangentially related to the films, including the actors?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's pretty dumb, considering they're not the same character... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.127.120.119 (talk) 09:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ;3

Does anyone support the change from 'Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy' to 'Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight trilogy' as Warner Bros. have been using the term 'The Dark Knight Trilogy' in the Man of Steel trailer, the upcoming DVD boxset and with the trilogy's scripts. I believe this change should be made. Does anyone else agree? --Bartallen2 (talk) 21:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd oppose it. There's no need to insist on giving it a label just because one can be found as a marketing device. In my mind it is still best to leave this as a descriptive title. Also with leaving the title as it is, it is in keeping with the

talk) 10:36, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

That collective term you speak of was only for the DVD's whereas 'The Dark Knight Trilogy' has been marketted in a trailer, a compliation of the scripts and throughout various articles upon the Internet, so on and so forth.--Bartallen2 (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still, a descriptive title is better, rather than a marketing title. Maybe we could reconsider in the future, but there's nothing wrong with it how it is, and if you look at the

talk) 08:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The Dark Knight Trilogy is the official title for this series, and it should be title for this template. Charles Essie (talk) 18:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a retroactively added marketing construct. Is Batman: The Motion Picture Anthology the "official" title[1] for the Burton/Schumaker films? --

talk) 08:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Assuming pages on the DCEU versions of Batman-related characters such as Harley Quinn and Joker get published into the mainspace, would they be better lumped in the DCEU section along with Bruce Wayne / Batman, or put down as "Related"? Batman appears in Suicide Squad, which features both Harley and Joker, but while they're both traditionally Batman villains, Harley has her own film in the franchise independent from Batman, namely Birds of Prey.--WuTang94 (talk) 20:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Dark Knight trilogy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]