Template talk:COVID-19 pandemic data/Netherlands medical cases chart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconMedicine: Pulmonology
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the Pulmonology task force.
WikiProject iconNetherlands
WikiProject iconThis template falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
WikiProject iconViruses
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

WikiProject COVID-19

I've created

2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, --Another Believer (Talk) 18:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Excessive data on the chart

The change in deaths should either be absolute or relative as having both bloats the chart (this is not a spreadsheet) and breaks the lines on mobile. I'll wait until a decision is made to convert the chart to the newest standard ('data' parameter). Alexiscoutinho (talk) 04:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and I think it only makes sense to simply show the relative change in deaths, just like the number of cases. If anyone wants the absolute change, those can be found in the table. FlippyElectricitySocket (talk) 12:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy data RIVM - Hopkins

Since mid March there is a discrepancy between Wikipedia and Hopkins for total number of cases in the Netherlands. Since end of July the deviation increases.

date;wikipedia;hopkins;deviation

2020-02-25;0;0;0

2020-03-03;24;24;0

2020-03-10;382;382;0

2020-03-17;1705;1711;6

2020-03-24;5560;5580;20

2020-03-31;12595;12667;72

2020-04-02;14697;14788;91

2020-04-09;21762;21903;141

2020-04-16;29214;29383;169

2020-04-23;35729;35921;192

2020-05-05;41087;41286;199

2020-05-12;42984;43183;199

2020-05-19;44249;44449;200

2020-05-26;45578;45780;202

2020-06-02;46647;46852;205

2020-06-09;47903;48109;206

2020-06-16;49087;49295;208

2020-06-23;49722;49930;208

2020-06-30;50273;50483;210

2020-07-07;50694;50907;213

2020-07-14;51146;51362;216

2020-07-21;52073;52307;234

2020-07-28;53374;53647;273

2020-08-04;55955;56279;324

2020-08-11;59973;60391;418

2020-08-18;63973;65560;1587

2020-08-25;67543;69683;2140

2020-09-01;71129;73802;2673

2020-09-08;76548;79792;3244; — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwappa (talkcontribs) 06:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020-09-15;84778;88763;3985

2020-09-22;98240;102844;4604; Uwappa (talk) 07:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020-09-29;117566;122620;5054; Uwappa (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020-10-06;144999;150413;5414; Uwappa (talk) 06:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020-10-13;188876;194591;5715; Uwappa (talk) 08:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hopkins numbers extracted from https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html -> NL -> chart Cumulative Cases

The Dutch RIVM should be reliable and is now the source for Wikipedia. Hopkins should be reliable too. So there should not be a deviation, certainly not one that increases rapidly.

The deviation is now too high to be the result of a later sampling time on same day as RIVM.

What should be the source for Wikipedia, RIVM or Hopkins?

Uwappa (talk) 05:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]