Template talk:Earth

Geology Template‑class

Template talk:Earth is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

	Astronomy Template‑class
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

A beautiful case of navbox creep, a template that got out of hand completely. So this is a navbox about "Earth", and people thought it suitable to link things like

Well I disagree. The template as it stood was something of a consensus. Yes, creation myths, Earth day and world maps are entirely appropriate topics for this NavBox. Check the Earth article and it's sub-articles: it covers cartography, religious beliefs and other cultural aspects.—RJH (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the fringe theories due to

WP:ONEWAY and removed the religious/Gaia references since it doesn't belong in a predominantly scientific nav box, Second Quantization (talk) 18:11, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm not familiar with template syntax to make this change by myself. 176.15.136.200 (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We're discussing merging this template with {{

The merge discussion has now moved to TfD. Please feel free to comment there. — hike395 (talk) 11:18, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The latest proposed merged template is at Template:Earth/sandbox. Please feel free to edit, or propose changes at TfD. — hike395 (talk) 06:05, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yreuq reordered the rows of this navbox to be alphabetical. I have a mild preference for the old ordering (which is roughly by importance). Several new links were also added to the navbox.

What do other editors think of the latest version? Will leave notice at