Template talk:Formula One Championship

Formula One Template‑class

This template is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information. View the task list Discuss the project Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Before changing the width of the template or adding <br>'s, please try and resize your browser window. It might look quite different to all of us using a different screen resolution than you :-) Best regards, Fred Bradstadt 18:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about giving the decades their own line. I think it makes it a lot easier to read and find the year you're looking for.

Manipe 18:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I prefer it as it, taking less vertical real estate. Also, if it is changed, I think it will look odd when 2010 is sitting on a line by itself on the bottom. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 23:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like it, is gets a lot easier to find what you're looking for. And when the time comes for a 2010 article, we'll think of something. Maybe adding all the 2011, 2012, 2013, even without linking to non-existing articles, just thre numbers there, to make this look ok.--Serte 10:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll change it for now, as well as adding the v.d.e, so that people can comment/change it back. Manipe 20:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I see no need for having a link to

There is some speculation specifically related to 2010 (possible return of turbocharging, bio-diesels, aerodynamic freeze, etc). It seems reasonable (to me) to record this speculation in an article called

2010 Formula One season. And if it's reasonable to have an article, then I think it's reasonable to link to it from the template. DH85868993 13:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

There was an earlier

WP:CRYSTAL back in August. Once more sourced detail became available and the article got recreated, I went ahead and added it to the template. I figure that as long as the article exists, you might as well have a link to it in the template to make it easier to navigate to.--After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 14:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

This big list of seasons is unwieldy. At the very least it should be broken down by decade... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.65.102.211 (talk) 22:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fine how it is. It was changed to one row per decade back in 2006 (see further up this page) but then changed back to the current format shortly afterwards. Apparently nobody else has found the list too unwieldy for the past decade. DH85868993 (talk) 23:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]