Template talk:Functional groups

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconChemistry Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Requested move 15 December 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested, unopposed. Dekimasuよ! 21:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Functional group → Template:Functional groups – The name of this nav template is inherently plural, like any category, and in keeping with the title it displays. A876 (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 18:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Move target corrected (Templates do not belong in article namespace}. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for correcting this request. I accidentally requested move of [Template:Functional group] "over" the existing redirecting article [Functional groups]. You are correct. I meant to request the move "over" the existing redirecting template [Template:Functional groups]. -A876 (talk) 18:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.

Nitrite

Isn't nitrite also a functional group similar to nitro? in here it says that nitrite is group similar to nitro but it bonds differently (R-O-N=O instead of R-N(-O)-O). I think we should add it too. אלון סול (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The See also list

Should not the § See also-list be in this template, as articles:

? DePiep (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]