Template talk:Largest cities of the Netherlands

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This template is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities Netherlands This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands This template is supported by Dutch municipalities task force.

This template was considered for deletion on 2023 August 29. The result of the discussion was "'Keep'".

The current population numbers are incorrect: the population of Rotterdam is now equal to the entire Randstad, comprising, among other cities, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, and Utrecht. This template should be reverted to the correct and sourced numbers. – JamesBrownIsDead (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've did a big update on the list. The original population that was listed here was way too much, I've now noted the people who lives in the municipality of the city. The population is correct as of 1 February 2012. Also, I don't know who thought that we have counties, but we're not the US. We have provinces.

In the first half of the table, the column title "Name" seems to be missing. – Editør (talk) 21:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could a more specific source reference be added? – Editør (talk) 10:56, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haarlemmermeer is not a city nor a town, it's a municipality. --Ajv39 (talk) 21:07, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]