Template talk:Spaceflight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconSpaceflight Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconRocketry Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAviation Template‑class
WikiProject icon
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

template

The

Template:Space exploration lists and timelines was initially a good idea, trying to collect spaceflight-related articles by collecting their lists. However, it has been filled with less relevant topics, just notable for inclusion in that template for happening to being spaceflight-related lists (such as List of Mir spacewalks, notable indeed but I think there are many other articles deserving a look before going to that one). Therefore, I think we need a general spaceflight template. Templates to further related articles may be found in the subarticles of this one. Man on the Mars (talk) 06:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

This template is a good idea, but it probably makes sense to pro-actively address the question implied above, i.e. "What are the criteria for inclusion of a topic in this template?" Is it, for example, somehow connected to the "spaceflight-importance" value in the corresponding {{WPSpace}} template? (sdsds - talk) 23:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]