Template talk:Statistics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconStatistics Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Statisticians

Should the template include notable statisticians? I think it may be too much, but what does everybody else think? Lilac Soul (talk contribs count) 08:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If we do, we should probably only include the top five or six or so. --Arcadian 11:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't seem relevant to me. The purpose of the template is to make it easier to navigate to related topics, and I think it's unlikely anyone will want to navigate from
R. A. Fisher. --Zvika 11:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
It sounds like a good idea to me, but perhaps it could be it's own navbox?

More topics for navbox

Could topics like

Bimodal distribution and Binomial distribution be included? They seem to be already included in the ProbDistribution navbox, but that navbox is very large. Rhetth (talk) 22:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Link to project

Apparently, links to

WP:SELF - WikiProjects should not be included in articles or on their templates. I have removed.—G716 <T·C> 01:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Split?

This template has become quite large, and as

Template:Applied-footer etc. Thoughts / volunteers? (I'm not taking this on on my own..) Qwfp (talk) 10:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

"Quite large" is, of course, relative. This template is bigger than a breadbox ({{
own) and the "Publications" section to keep the template from becoming list cruft. I'm not sure that some of the possible sub topics are big enough to rate a separate template. If this idea moves forward, I'll be willing to help out. Regards—G716 <T·C> 01:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
We could make it collapsible: {{
Herbs & spices}}—G716 <T·C> 01:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
or collapsible, with autoshow groups: {{
ProbDistributions}}—G716 <T·C> 05:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
We could use {{Least squares and regression analysis}} as one of the sub-topic templates.—G716 <T·C> 05:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed publications and history sections to reduce size of template. If anyone objects, please revert. —G716 <T·C> 12:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Econometrics

Perhaps have a separate template for the subset of statistics that pertains to econometrics? cancan101 (talk) 02:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is a subset of statistics that pertains only to econometrics. But that doesn't preclude having an econometrics Nav template as well: I don't know of there already is one. Melcombe (talk) 09:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Experimental design

Following the previous discussion, I augmented the template on design of experiments, resulting in the operational template Template:Experimental design. The template is designed for (somewhat) more knowledgable users, than is the basic statistics template. For example, Student's t is listed next to Hotelling's T, to provide context for the latter.