Template talk:U.S. family-oriented television channels

United States: Television Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by American television task force.

Television Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

The Family portal was recently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 10:22, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see frequent reversion of the addition of the Freeform channel to this template. I don't see any discussion. Thought discussing a frequently made addition might be a decent thing to do. BusterD (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the network's format has completely shifted away from family programming (the addition of Family Guy and The Office reruns during its daytime schedule makes this self-evident, along with its original programming having long abandoned TV-G/PG standards) and its rebranding all but complete, the removal is appropriate and justified. Nate • (chatter) 01:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. We might establish a consensus here before the page protection expires... BusterD (talk) 01:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While Freeform certainly isn't a family-oriented channel, it's multi-name predecessor certainly was. Since there (apparently) isn't a separate article on that predecessor, shouldn't it be listed under "Defunct", and be linked to Freeform, with the navbox added to the article? Assuming good faith, that may be why it's been repeatedly added to the navbox. BilCat (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought of that before writing this up and I'm agreeable to that; it's just not the current-day format. I know there's a historical article so I'll put a link to that. (also did a minor bit of spell correction, didn't change anything else!). Nate • (chatter) 02:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]