The Doors of Perception
LC Class | RM666.P48 H9 2004 |
Part of a series on |
Psychedelia |
---|
The Doors of Perception is an
The Doors of Perception provoked strong reactions for its evaluation of
Background
William Blake
William Blake (1757–1827), who inspired the book's title and writing style, was an influential English artist most notable for his paintings and poetry. The "doors of perception" was originally a metaphor written by Blake in his 1790 book, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. The metaphor was used to represent Blake's feelings about mankind's limited perception of the reality around them:
If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his cavern.[3]
Mescaline
Mescaline is the principal active
In the 1930s, an American anthropologist
Huxley had been interested in spiritual matters and had used alternative therapies for some time. In 1936 he told
Research by Humphry Osmond
Huxley had first heard of peyote use in ceremonies of the Native American Church in New Mexico, soon after coming to the United States in 1937.[15] He first became aware of the cactus's active ingredient, mescaline, after reading an academic paper written by Humphry Osmond, a British psychiatrist working at Weyburn Mental Hospital, Saskatchewan, in early 1952. Osmond's paper set out results from his research into schizophrenia, using mescaline that he had been undertaking with colleagues, doctors Abram Hoffer and John Smythies.[16][17] In the epilogue to his novel The Devils of Loudun, published earlier that year, Huxley had written that drugs were "toxic short cuts to self-transcendence".[18] For the Canadian writer George Woodcock, Huxley had changed his opinion because mescaline was not addictive and appeared to be without unpleasant physical or mental side-effects. Further, he had found that hypnosis, autohypnosis and meditation had apparently failed to produce the results he wanted.[19]
Huxley's experience with mescaline
After reading Osmond's paper, Huxley sent him a letter on Thursday, 10 April 1952, expressing interest in the research and putting himself forward as an experimental subject. His letter explained his motivations as being rooted in an idea that the brain is a reducing valve that restricts consciousness, and hoping mescaline might help access a greater degree of awareness (an idea he later included in the book).[20] Reflecting on his stated motivations, Woodcock wrote that Huxley had realised that the ways to enlightenment were many, including prayer and meditation. He hoped drugs might also break down the barriers of the ego, and both draw him closer to spiritual enlightenment and satisfy his quest as a seeker of knowledge.[21]
In a second letter on Saturday, 19 April, Huxley invited Osmond to stay while he was visiting Los Angeles to attend the American Psychiatric Association convention.[22] He also wrote that he looked forward to the mescaline experience and reassured Osmond that his doctor did not object to his taking it.[20] Huxley had invited his friend, the writer Gerald Heard, to participate in the experiment; although Heard was too busy this time, he did join him for a session in November of that year.[23]
Day of the experiment
Osmond arrived at Huxley's house in West Hollywood on Sunday, 3 May 1953, and recorded his impressions of the famous author as a tolerant and kind man, although he had expected otherwise. The psychiatrist had misgivings about giving the drug to Huxley, and wrote, "I did not relish the possibility, however remote, of being the man who drove Aldous Huxley mad," but instead found him an ideal subject. Huxley was "shrewd, matter-of-fact and to the point" and his wife
The experience started in Huxley's study before the party made a seven block trip to The Owl Drug (
After returning home to listen to music, eat, and walk in the garden, a friend drove the threesome to the hills overlooking the city. Photographs show Huxley standing, alternately arms on hips and outstretched with a grin on his face. Finally, they returned home and to ordinary consciousness.[28] One of Huxley's friends who met him on the day said that despite writing about wearing flannel trousers, he was actually wearing blue jeans. Huxley admitted to having changed the fabric as Maria thought he should be better dressed for his readers.[29] Osmond later said he had a photo of the day that showed Huxley wearing flannels.[30]
Compilation of the book
After Osmond's departure, Huxley and Maria left to go on a three-week, 5,000-mile (8,000-kilometre) car trip around the national parks of the North West of the US. After returning to Los Angeles, he took a month to write the book.
If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is: Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his cavern.[34]
Huxley had used Blake's metaphor in The Doors of Perception while discussing the paintings of
Synopsis
After a brief overview of research into mescaline, Huxley recounts that he was given 4/10 of a gram at 11:00 am one day in May 1953. Huxley writes that he hoped to gain insight into extraordinary states of mind and expected to see brightly coloured visionary landscapes. When he only sees lights and shapes, he puts this down to being a bad visualiser; however, he experiences a great change in his perception of the external world.[38]
By 12:30 pm, a vase of flowers becomes the "miracle, moment by moment, of naked existence". The experience, he asserts, is neither agreeable nor disagreeable, but simply "is". He likens it to
Reflecting on the experience afterwards, Huxley finds himself in agreement with philosopher C. D. Broad that to enable us to live, the brain and nervous system eliminate unessential information from the totality of the 'Mind at Large'.[40]
In summary, Huxley writes that the ability to think straight is not reduced while under the influence of mescaline, visual impressions are intensified, and the human experimenter will see no reason for action because the experience is so fascinating.[41]
Temporarily leaving the chronological flow, he mentions that four or five hours into the experience he was taken to the World's Biggest Drug Store (WBDS), where he was presented with books on art. In one book, the dress in Botticelli's Judith provokes a reflection on drapery as a major artistic theme as it allows painters to include the abstract in representational art, to create mood, and also to represent the mystery of pure being.[42] Huxley feels that human affairs are somewhat irrelevant whilst on mescaline and attempts to shed light on this by reflecting on paintings featuring people.[43] Cézanne's Self-portrait with a straw hat seems incredibly pretentious, while Vermeer's human still lifes (also, the Le Nain brothers and Vuillard) are the nearest to reflecting this not-self state.[44]
For Huxley, the reconciliation of these cleansed perceptions with humanity reflects the age old debate between active and contemplative life, known as the way of
After listening to
After lunch and the drive to the WBDS he returns home and to his ordinary state of mind. His final insight is taken from Buddhist scripture: that within sameness there is difference, although that difference is not different from sameness.[48]
The book finishes with Huxley's final reflections on the meaning of his experience. Firstly, the urge to transcend one's self is universal through times and cultures (and was characterised by H. G. Wells as The Door in the Wall).[49] He reasons that better, healthier "doors" are needed than alcohol and tobacco. Mescaline has the advantage of not provoking violence in takers, but its effects last an inconveniently long time and some users can have negative reactions. Ideally, self-transcendence would be found in religion, but Huxley feels that it is unlikely that this will ever happen. Christianity and mescaline seem well-suited for each other; the Native American Church for instance uses the drug as a sacrament, where its use combines religious feeling with decorum.[50]
Huxley concludes that mescaline is neither divine illumination nor beatific vision, but a "gratuitous grace" (a term taken from Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica).[51] It is not necessary but helpful, especially so for the intellectual, who can become the victim of words and symbols. Although systematic reasoning is important, direct perception has intrinsic value too. Finally, Huxley maintains that the person who has this experience will be transformed for the better.
Reception
The book met with a variety of responses, both positive and negative,
Literature
For the Scottish poet Edwin Muir, "Mr. Huxley's experiment is extraordinary, and is beautifully described".[53] Thomas Mann, the author and friend of Huxley, believed the book demonstrated Huxley's escapism. He thought that while escapism found in mysticism might be honourable, drugs were not. Huxley's 'aesthetic self-indulgence' and indifference to humanity would lead to suffering or stupidity; Mann concluded the book was irresponsible, if not quite immoral, to encourage young people to try the drug mescaline.[54]
For Huxley's biographer and friend, the author Sybille Bedford, the book combined sincerity with simplicity, passion with detachment.[55] "It reflects the heart and mind open to meet the given, ready, even longing, to accept the wonderful. The Doors is a quiet book. It is also one that postulates a goodwill – the choice once more of the nobler hypothesis. It turned out, for certain temperaments, a seductive book".[56] For biographer David King Dunaway, The Doors of Perception, along with The Art of Seeing, can be seen as the closest Huxley ever came to autobiographical writing.[57]
Psychiatry
For Steven J. Novak, The Doors of Perception and
Philosophy and religion
Huxley's friend and spiritual mentor, the Vedantic monk Swami Prabhavananda, thought that mescaline was an illegitimate path to enlightenment, a "deadly heresy" as Christopher Isherwood put it.[30] Other thinkers[who?] expressed similar apprehensions.
Martin Buber
Martin Buber, the Jewish religious philosopher, attacked Huxley's notion that mescaline allowed a person to participate in "common being", and held that the drug ushered users "merely into a strictly private sphere". Buber believed the drug experiences to be holidays "from the person participating in the community of logos and cosmos—holidays from the very uncomfortable reminder to verify oneself as such a person." For Buber man must master, withstand and alter his situation, or even leave it, "but the fugitive flight out of the claim of the situation into situationlessness is no legitimate affair of man."[63]
Robert Charles Zaehner
That the longing to transcend oneself is "one of the principal appetites of the soul"[68] is questioned by Zaehner. There are still people who do not feel this desire to escape themselves,[69] and religion itself need not mean escaping from the ego.[70] Zaehner criticises what he sees as Huxley's apparent call for all religious people to use drugs (including alcohol) as part of their practices.[71] Quoting St Paul's proscriptions against drunkenness in church, in 1 Corinthians xi, Zaehner makes the point that artificial ecstatic states and spiritual union with God are not the same.[66]
Holding that there are similarities between the experience on mescaline, the
Soon after the publication of his book, Huxley wrote to Harold Raymond at Chatto and Windus that he thought it strange that when
Huston Smith
Professor of religion and philosophy Huston Smith argued that Mysticism Sacred and Profane had not fully examined and refuted Huxley's claims made in The Doors of Perception.[76] Smith claims that consciousness-changing substances have been linked with religion both throughout history and across the world, and further it is possible that many religious perspectives had their origins in them, which were later forgotten. Acknowledging that personality, preparation and environment all play a role in the effects of the drugs, Huston Smith draws attention to evidence that suggests that a religious outcome of the experience may not be restricted to one of Huxley's temperament. Further, because Zaehner's experience was not religious, does not prove that none will be. Contrary to Zaehner, Huston Smith draws attention to evidence suggesting that these drugs can facilitate theistic mystical experience.[76]
As the descriptions of naturally occurring and drug-stimulated mystical experiences cannot be distinguished phenomenologically, Huston Smith regards Zaehner's position in Mysticism Sacred and Profane, as a product of the conflict between science and religion – that religion tends to ignore the findings of science. Nonetheless, although these drugs may produce a religious experience, they need not produce a religious life, unless set within a context of faith and discipline. Finally, he concludes that psychedelic drugs should not be forgotten in relation to religion because the phenomenon of religious
Later experience
Huxley continued to take these substances several times a year until his death,[77] but with a serious and temperate frame of mind.[78] He refused to talk about the substances outside scientific meetings,[79] turned down an invitation to talk about them on TV[80] and refused the leadership of a foundation devoted to the study of psychedelics, explaining that they were only one of his diverse number of interests.[81] For Philip Thody, a professor of French literature, Huxley's revelations made him conscious of the objections that had been put forward to his theory of mysticism set out in Eyeless in Gaza and Grey Eminence, and consequently Island reveals a more humane philosophy.[82] However, this change in perspective may lie elsewhere. In October 1955, Huxley had an experience while on mescaline that he considered more profound than those detailed in The Doors of Perception. He decided his previous experiments, the ones detailed in Doors and Heaven and Hell, had been "temptations to escape from the central reality into false, or at least imperfect and partial Nirvanas of beauty and mere knowledge."[83] He wrote in a letter to Humphry Osmond, that he experienced "the direct, total awareness, from the inside, so to say, of Love as the primary and fundamental cosmic fact. ... I was this fact; or perhaps it would be more accurate to say that this fact occupied the place where I had been."[84] The experience made its way into the final chapter of Island.[85] This raised a troublesome point. Was it better to pursue a course of careful psychological experimentation.... or was the real value of these drugs to "stimulate the most basic kind of religious ecstasy"?[83]
Influence
A variety of influences have been claimed for the book. The psychedelic proselytiser
This book was the influence behind Jim Morrison naming his band The Doors in 1965.[90][91]
In popular culture
In the 2016 film Doctor Strange, Stan Lee's character is seen reading the book, calling it, "hilarious."[92]
Publication history
The Doors of Perception is usually published in a combined volume with Huxley's essay Heaven and Hell (1956)
- The Doors of Perception and Heaven and Hell, 1954, 1956, Harper & Brothers
- 1977 Harpercollins (UK), mass market paperback: ISBN 0-586-04437-X
- 1990 Harper Perennial edition: ISBN 0-06-090007-5
- 2004 Harper Modern Classics edition: ISBN 0-06-059518-3
- 2004 Sagebrush library binding: ISBN 1-4176-2859-6
- 2009 First Harper Perennial Modern Classics edition: ISBN 978-0-06-172907-2
- The Doors of Perception, unabridged audio cassette, Audio Partners 1998, ISBN 1-57270-065-3
See also
References
- ^ Huxley, Aldous (1954) The Doors of Perception, Chatto and Windus, p. 15
- ^ "If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his cavern.” William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell
- ^ Blake, William (1790). The Marriage of Heaven and Hell.
- ^ Lower Pecos and Coahuila peyote: new radiocarbon dates. Terry M, Steelman KL, Guilderson T, Dering P, Rowe MW. J Archaeological Science. 2006;33:1017–1021.
- ^ About Dr. Arthur Heffter Archived 18 September 2010 at the Wayback Machine Hefter Research Institute Site
- ^ Powell, Simon G Mescaline, An Overview Archived 5 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Grob, Charles S. Psychiatric Research with Hallucinogens: What have we learned? | The Psychotomimetic Model Yearbook for Ethnomedicine and the Study of Consciousness, Issue 3, 1994
- ISBN 1-59477-393-9
- ^ "American National Biography Online: Burroughs, William S." www.anb.org. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "Jack Kerouac". www.poetryfoundation.org. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "Allen Ginsberg". www.poetryfoundation.org. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "Beat Art - the-artists.org". the-artists.org. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ Letter to T.S. Eliot, 8 July 1936; Smith, Letters of Aldous Huxley, pp. 405–6
- ^ Dunaway, David King, p. 133
- ISBN 0-571-08939-9
- ^ "smythies". www.hofmann.org. Retrieved 17 May 2016.
- ISBN 0-00-216006-4
- ^ Huxley, Aldous (1952), The Devils of Loudun, Chatto & Windus
- ^ Woodcock (1972) p. 275
- ^ a b Bedford (1974) p. 144
- ^ Woodcock (1972) p. 274
- ^ a b Bedford (1974) p. 142
- ISBN 0-349-11348-3
- ^ Bedford(1974) p. 145
- ^ Murray (2003) p. 399
- ^ Bedford (1974) p. 145
- ISBN 0-7619-9065-8
- ^ Dunaway, David King (1989), pp. 228–300
- ^ Bedford (1974) p. 163
- ^ a b c Murray (2003) p. 401
- ^ Morris Eaves; Robert N. Essick; Joseph Viscomi (eds.). "The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, object 14 (Bentley 14, Erdman 14, Keynes 14)". William Blake Archive. Retrieved 10 June 2014.
- ^ Bedford (1974) p. 146
- ^ Murray (2003) p. 400
- ^ Blake, William (1790) The Marriage of Heaven and Hell Plate 14
- ISBN 0-06-090191-8
- ISSN 1354-991X.
- ^ Dunaway, David King (1989) p. 283
- ^ Huxley (1954) p. 11
- ^ Huxley (1954) p. 15
- ^ Huxley (1954) pp. 16–7
- ^ Huxley (1954) p. 19
- ^ Huxley (1954) pp. 21–25
- ^ Huxley (1954) p. 27
- ^ Huxley (1954) pp. 29–33
- ^ Huxley (1954) p. 33
- ^ Huxley (1954) pp. 39–40
- ^ Huxley (1954) pp. 41–46
- ^ Huxley (1954) p. 48
- ^ Huxley (1954) p. 49
- ^ Huxley (1954) pp. 55–58
- ^ Huxley (1954) p. 63
- ^ LaBarre, Weston "Twenty Years of Peyote Studies", Current Anthropology, Vol. 1, No. 1, (Jan. 1960) pp. 45–60
- ^ Huxley, Aldous (1954) Dust Jacket
- ISBN 978-1-136-20969-7.
- ^ Bedford (1974) p. 155
- ^ Bedford, Sybille (1974) p. 156
- ^ Dunaway, David King (1989) p. 297
- ^ Sargant, William "Chemical Mysticism", British Medical Journal, Vol. 1, No. 4869 (1 May 1954), p. 1024
- ^ Roland Fisher, quoted in Louis Cholden, ed. Lysergic Acid Diethylamide and Mescaline in Experimental Psychiatry, p. 67, Grune and Stratton, 1956
- ^ Meerloo, Joost A.M. Medication into Submission: The Danger of Therapeutic Coercion, Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 1955, 122: 353–360
- ^ Novak, Steven J. LSD before Leary: Sidney Cohen's Critique of 1950s Psychedelic Drug Research, Isis, Vol. 88, No. 1 (Mar. 1997), pp. 87–110
- ^ Novak, Steven J. (1997)
- ^ Buber, Martin (1965) The Knowledge of Man: Selected Essays ed Maurice S. Friedman, Harper & Row
- ^ Richards, William A. "Entheogens in the Study of Religious Experiences: Current Status", Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 44, No. 4 (Winter, 2005), pp. 377–389
- ^ Zaehner, RC (1957) Mysticism Sacred and Profane, Clarendon Press, p. 3
- ^ a b Zaehner p. 25
- ^ Zaehner p. 3
- ^ Huxley, Aldous (1955), The Doors of Perception, p. 49
- ^ Zaehner p. 18
- ^ Zaehner, p. 26
- ^ Zaehner p. 19
- ^ Zaehner, Introduction p.xi
- ^ Zaehner p. 28
- ^ Murray (2003) p. 403
- ISBN 0-89281-758-5
- ^ a b c Huston Smith (1964) Do Drugs Have Religious Import? The Journal of Philosophy, 61, 18
- ^ Dunaway, David King (1989) p. 300
- ^ Dunaway, David King (1989) p. 327
- ^ Dunaway, David King (1989) p. 298
- ^ Dunaway, David King (1989) p. 330
- ^ Dunaway, David King (1989) p. 369
- ISBN 0-289-70189-9
- ^ ISBN 0-8021-3587-0
- ^ Letter to Humphry Osmond, 24 October 1955. in Achera Huxley, Laura (1969) This Timeless Moment. p. 139, Chatto & Windus
- ^ Achera Huxley, p. 146
- ^ Leary, Timothy (1968) High Priest, New World Publishing
- ^ Richard, William A. "Entheogens in the Study of Religious Experiences: Current Status", Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 44, No. 4 (Winter, 2005), pp. 377–389
- ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the originalon 4 January 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2024.
- ^ "Is psychedelics research closer to theology than to science? Caves all the way down". Aeon. Retrieved 13 January 2024.
- ISBN 978-1-55652-754-8.
- ^ Kaye, Griffin. (June 5, 2022), "The Doors On Ed Sullivan: Music's Greatest Act Of Rebellion", Lace 'Em Up (Retrieved: August 9, 2022)
- ^ "11 Doctor Strange Easter eggs you might have missed". Digital Spy. 29 October 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
External links
- The Doors of Perception at Faded Page (Canada)