Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Chinese. (January 2024) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
The Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan (
island of Taiwan
's present legal status.
In 1950, after the outbreak of the
Formosa must await the restoration of security in the Pacific, a peace settlement with Japan, or consideration by the United Nations."[1] This statement of Truman is generally regarded as the origin of the Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan.[2]
In 1951, Japan concluded the
Pescadores without explicitly stating the sovereignty status of the two territories.[3]
The Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan is supported by some politicians and jurists to this day.[4][5][6]
Kinmen and Matsu
The theory does not apply to
Dongyin Island, Dongju Island, and Xiju Island) have been continuously controlled by this government since the overthrow of the Qing Empire in 1912, while Kinmen and the other two major Matsu Islands have been controlled except for a period of occupation in World War II
.
See also
- General Order No. 1
- Occupation of Japan
- Treaty of San Francisco
- Treaty of Taipei
- Political status of Taiwan
- History of Taiwan
References
- Harry S. Truman Library and Museum. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
- .
- ^ Wikisource.
Chapter II. Territory – Article 2 – (b) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.
. 8 September 1951 – via - ^ Shirley A. Kan; Wayne M. Morrison (11 December 2014). "U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues" (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. p. 4.
The United States has its own "one China" policy (vs. the PRC's "one China" principle) and position on Taiwan's status. Not recognizing the PRC's claim over Taiwan nor Taiwan as a sovereign state, U.S. policy has considered Taiwan's status as unsettled.
- ^ 曾韋禎 (3 May 2009). 台灣主權未定論 許世楷:日本外交界常識 [Koh Se-kai: Theory of the Undetermined Sovereignty of Taiwan Is a General Knowledge in the Japanese Diplomatic Circle]. Liberty Times (in Chinese). Taipei. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
- ^ 林良昇 (24 October 2015). 國際法觀點 學者:台灣被中華民國政府佔領70年 [⟨International Law Perspective⟩ Scholar: Taiwan Has Been Occupied by the Government of the Republic of China for 70 Years]. Liberty Times (in Chinese). Taipei. Retrieved 12 December 2015.
- United States Government Printing Office. p. 896.
The legal position is different, as I think I pointed out in my last press conference, by virtue of the fact that technical sovereignty over Formosa and the Pescadores has never been settled. That is because the Japanese peace treaty merely involves a renunciation by Japan of its right and title to these island. But the future title is not determined by the Japanese peace treaty, nor is it determined by the peace treaty which was concluded between the Republic of China and Japan. Therefore, the juridical status of these islands, Formosa and the Pescadores, is different from the juridical status of the offshore islands which have always been Chinese territory.